154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16157975)
1. A technique for the measurement of visceral fat by ultrasonography: comparison of measurements by ultrasonography and computed tomography.
Hirooka M; Kumagi T; Kurose K; Nakanishi S; Michitaka K; Matsuura B; Horiike N; Onji M
Intern Med; 2005 Aug; 44(8):794-9. PubMed ID: 16157975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Sonographic evaluation of visceral fat by measuring para- and perirenal fat.
Kawasaki S; Aoki K; Hasegawa O; Numata K; Tanaka K; Shibata N; Shimada S; Okamura A; Terauchi Y
J Clin Ultrasound; 2008; 36(3):129-33. PubMed ID: 18027837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [An assessment of abdominal fatty tissue distribution in obese children. A comparison between echography and computed tomography].
Ferrozzi F; Zuccoli G; Tognini G; Castriota-Scanderbeg A; Bacchini E; Bernasconi S; Campani R
Radiol Med; 1999 Dec; 98(6):490-4. PubMed ID: 10755010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A novel method of measuring intra-abdominal fat volume using helical computed tomography.
Kobayashi J; Tadokoro N; Watanabe M; Shinomiya M
Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord; 2002 Mar; 26(3):398-402. PubMed ID: 11896496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Compatibility of different methods for the measurement of visceral fat in different body mass index strata.
Berker D; Koparal S; Işik S; Paşaoğlu L; Aydin Y; Erol K; Delibaşi T; Güler S
Diagn Interv Radiol; 2010 Jun; 16(2):99-105. PubMed ID: 20180182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Evaluation of visceral adipose in abdominal obesity and its clinical application].
Pu YF; He HB; Zhao ZG; Chen J; Ni YX; Zhong J; Liu HY; Yan ZC; Zhu ZM
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2008 Sep; 88(34):2391-4. PubMed ID: 19087712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Ultrasonographic evaluation of visceral and subcutaneous abdominal fat tissue before and after bariatric surgery.
Djurić-Stefanović A; Vasin D; Jovanović S; Lazić Lj; Kovac J; Popović I; Bajec Dj; Saranović Dj
Acta Chir Iugosl; 2013; 60(3):25-30. PubMed ID: 24669577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Visceral fat in different locations assessed by ultrasound: Correlation with computed tomography and cut-off values in patients with metabolic syndrome.
Pimanov S; Bondarenko V; Makarenko E
Clin Obes; 2020 Dec; 10(6):e12404. PubMed ID: 32857464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Significance of ultrasound-measured visceral fat thickness in obesity].
Szebeni A; Halmy L
Orv Hetil; 2010 Sep; 151(39):1580-4. PubMed ID: 20840914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Is echography an adequate method for assessing the thickness of intra-abdominal fat? A comparison with computed tomography].
Cucchi E; Piatti PM; Orena C; Pontiroli AE; Martino E; Paesano PL; Pozza G; Del Maschio A
Radiol Med; 1997 Oct; 94(4):329-34. PubMed ID: 9465239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effect of visceral fat tissue on superior mesenteric artery configuration: Is it superior to BMI?
Bahadir Ülger FE
Turk J Gastroenterol; 2020 Jun; 31(6):433-440. PubMed ID: 32721914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Diagnostic method for visceral fat obesity].
Nakamura T
Nihon Rinsho; 2009 Feb; 67(2):313-8. PubMed ID: 19202905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Perirenal fat thickness measured with computed tomography is a reliable estimate of perirenal fat mass.
Favre G; Grangeon-Chapon C; Raffaelli C; François-Chalmin F; Iannelli A; Esnault V
PLoS One; 2017; 12(4):e0175561. PubMed ID: 28423008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Validation of the measurement of intra-abdominal fat between ultrasound and CT scan in women with obesity and infertility.
Kuchenbecker WK; Groen H; Pel H; Bolster JH; Wolffenbuttel BH; Land JA; Hoek A; Corpeleijn E
Obesity (Silver Spring); 2014 Feb; 22(2):537-44. PubMed ID: 23512889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of the effect of visceral fat area on the distance and angle between the superior mesenteric artery and the aorta.
Ozbulbul NI; Yurdakul M; Dedeoglu H; Tola M; Olcer T
Surg Radiol Anat; 2009 Aug; 31(7):545-9. PubMed ID: 19280099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Methods of estimation of visceral fat: advantages of ultrasonography.
Ribeiro-Filho FF; Faria AN; Azjen S; Zanella MT; Ferreira SR
Obes Res; 2003 Dec; 11(12):1488-94. PubMed ID: 14694213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Relationship Between the Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate and Visceral Fat Thickness Based on Ultrasound in Patients With Obesity Who Have Normal Renal Function Without Hypertension or Diabetes.
Kang Y; Huang L; Wang R; Xu L; Yang Y; Cui X
J Ultrasound Med; 2019 Sep; 38(9):2287-2294. PubMed ID: 30609092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Automatic distance measurement of abdominal aorta for ultrasonography-based visceral fat estimation.
Wang J; Zhou Y; Koizumi N; Kubota N; Asano T; Yuhashi K; Mitake T; Itani K; Takahashi T; Takeishi S; Sasaki S; Kadowaki T; Sakuma I; Liao H
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2013; 2013():6486-9. PubMed ID: 24111227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Sonographic subcutaneous and visceral fat indices represent the distribution of body fat volume.
Koda M; Senda M; Kamba M; Kimura K; Murawaki Y
Abdom Imaging; 2007; 32(3):387-92. PubMed ID: 16947071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Using simple radiologic measurements to anticipate surgical challenge in endometrial cancer: a prospective study.
Harrison RF; Mcnamara JE; Beaumont CB; Sadowski EA; Chappell RJ; Shahzad MM; Spencer RJ; Al-Niaimi AN; Barroilhet LM; Rose SL; Kushner DM
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2019 Jan; 29(1):102-107. PubMed ID: 30640690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
