These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
206 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1615834)
21. Efficacy and safety of monophasic and biphasic waveform shocks using a braided endocardial defibrillation lead system. Saksena S; Scott SE; Accorti PR; Boveja BK; Abels D; Callaghan FJ Am Heart J; 1990 Dec; 120(6 Pt 1):1342-7. PubMed ID: 2248181 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Transthoracic defibrillation: effect of dual-pathway sequential pulse shocks and single-pathway biphasic pulse shocks in a canine model. Scott BD; Kallok MJ; Birkett C; Kieso RA; Kerber RE Am Heart J; 1993 Jan; 125(1):99-109. PubMed ID: 8417549 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. A prospective randomized evaluation of biphasic versus monophasic waveform pulses on defibrillation efficacy in humans. Bardy GH; Ivey TD; Allen MD; Johnson G; Mehra R; Greene HL J Am Coll Cardiol; 1989 Sep; 14(3):728-33. PubMed ID: 2768721 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Effect of electrode polarity on internal defibrillation with monophasic and biphasic waveforms using an endocardial lead system. Huang J; KenKnight BH; Walcott GP; Walker RG; Smith WM; Ideker RE J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 1997 Feb; 8(2):161-71. PubMed ID: 9048247 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Comparison of defibrillation efficacy using biphasic waveforms delivered from various capacitances/pulse widths. Lin JH; Stotts LJ; Rosborough JP; Frederick H Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1997 Jan; 20(1 Pt 2):158-62. PubMed ID: 9121981 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Effects of polarity on defibrillation thresholds using a biphasic waveform in a hot can electrode system. Yamanouchi Y; Mowrey KA; Nadzam GR; Hills DG; Kroll MW; Brewer JE; Donohoo AM; Wilkoff BL; Tchou PJ Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1997 Dec; 20(12 Pt 1):2911-6. PubMed ID: 9455750 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Sequential or single pulse defibrillation? Investigations towards energy reduction in experimental animals. Hannekum A; Dalichau H; Kochs M; Müller H; Höher M; Hirche H Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1987 Oct; 35(5):270-6. PubMed ID: 2447668 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Defibrillation threshold and cardiac responses using an external biphasic defibrillator with pediatric and adult adhesive patches in pediatric-sized piglets. Killingsworth CR; Melnick SB; Chapman FW; Walker RG; Smith WM; Ideker RE; Walcott GP Resuscitation; 2002 Nov; 55(2):177-85. PubMed ID: 12413756 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Epicardial sock mapping following monophasic and biphasic shocks of equal voltage with an endocardial lead system. Usui M; Callihan RL; Walker RG; Walcott GP; Rollins DL; Wolf PD; Smith WM; Ideker RE J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 1996 Apr; 7(4):322-34. PubMed ID: 8777480 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. A direct comparison of epicardial and nonthoracotomy defibrillation using monophasic and biphasic shocks. Thakur RK; Souza JJ; Troup PJ; Chapman PD; Wetherbee JN Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1995 Jan; 18(1 Pt 1):70-4. PubMed ID: 7700834 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. A comparison of biphasic and monophasic waveform defibrillation after prolonged ventricular fibrillation. Tang W; Weil MH; Sun S; Povoas HP; Klouche K; Kamohara T; Bisera J Chest; 2001 Sep; 120(3):948-54. PubMed ID: 11555534 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Prospective comparison of biphasic and monophasic shocks for implantable cardioverter-defibrillators using endocardial leads. Saksena S; An H; Mehra R; DeGroot P; Krol RB; Burkhardt E; Mehta D; John T Am J Cardiol; 1992 Aug; 70(3):304-10. PubMed ID: 1632393 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Optimization of epicardial electrode size and implant site for reduced sequential pulse defibrillation thresholds. Kallok MJ; Bourland JD; Tacker WA; Jones DL; Klein GJ; Wessale JL Med Instrum; 1986; 20(1):36-9. PubMed ID: 3959941 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Effect of biphasic waveform pulse on endocardial defibrillation efficacy in humans. Neuzner J; Pitschner HF; Huth C; Schlepper M Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1994 Feb; 17(2):207-12. PubMed ID: 7513406 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Comparison between two versus three patches single pulse shock defibrillation in pigs. Montenero AS; Bombardieri G; Barilaro C; Di Francesco P; Bertazzoni S; Santarelli P; Pisanó E; Alessandrini F; Possati G Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1991 Feb; 14(2 Pt 2):362-5. PubMed ID: 1706853 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Influence of polarity reversal on defibrillation success with biphasic shocks and a transvenous/subcutaneous defibrillator system in a porcine animal model. Stellbrink C; Schauerte P; Loeser H; Rosenbaum C; Kuckertz E; Vogel M; Messmer BJ; Hanrath P; Schoendube FA Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1998 Jul; 21(7):1435-41. PubMed ID: 9670188 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Internal cardioversion of atrial fibrillation in sheep. Cooper RA; Alferness CA; Smith WM; Ideker RE Circulation; 1993 May; 87(5):1673-86. PubMed ID: 8491023 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Intraoperative comparison of sequential-pulse and single-pulse defibrillation in candidates for automatic implantable defibrillators. Bardy GH; Stewart RB; Ivey TD; Graham EL; Adhar GC; Greene HL Am J Cardiol; 1987 Sep; 60(7):618-24. PubMed ID: 3630945 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Effect of pulse separation between two sequential biphasic shocks given over different lead configurations on ventricular defibrillation efficacy. Johnson EE; Alferness CA; Wolf PD; Smith WM; Ideker RE Circulation; 1992 Jun; 85(6):2267-74. PubMed ID: 1591840 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]