These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16158620)

  • 1. Place-pitch discrimination of single- versus dual-electrode stimuli by cochlear implant users (L).
    Donaldson GS; Kreft HA; Litvak L
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2005 Aug; 118(2):623-6. PubMed ID: 16158620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Using current steering to increase spectral resolution in CII and HiRes 90K users.
    Koch DB; Downing M; Osberger MJ; Litvak L
    Ear Hear; 2007 Apr; 28(2 Suppl):38S-41S. PubMed ID: 17496643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Dynamic current steering with phantom electrode in cochlear implants.
    Luo X; Garrett C
    Hear Res; 2020 May; 390():107949. PubMed ID: 32200300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Pitch adaptation patterns in bimodal cochlear implant users: over time and after experience.
    Reiss LA; Ito RA; Eggleston JL; Liao S; Becker JJ; Lakin CE; Warren FM; McMenomey SO
    Ear Hear; 2015; 36(2):e23-34. PubMed ID: 25319401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Dual electrode stimulation using the nucleus CI24RE cochlear implant: electrode impedance and pitch ranking studies.
    Busby PA; Plant KL
    Ear Hear; 2005 Oct; 26(5):504-11. PubMed ID: 16230899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Excitation patterns of simultaneous and sequential dual-electrode stimulation in cochlear implant recipients.
    Saoji AA; Litvak LM; Hughes ML
    Ear Hear; 2009 Oct; 30(5):559-67. PubMed ID: 19617837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Pitch ranking with nonsimultaneous dual-electrode electrical stimulation of the cochlea.
    McDermott HJ; McKay CM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1994 Jul; 96(1):155-62. PubMed ID: 8064018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Spread of excitation and channel interaction in single- and dual-electrode cochlear implant stimulation.
    Snel-Bongers J; Briaire JJ; Vanpoucke FJ; Frijns JH
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(3):367-76. PubMed ID: 22048258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Current steering creates additional pitch percepts in adult cochlear implant recipients.
    Firszt JB; Koch DB; Downing M; Litvak L
    Otol Neurotol; 2007 Aug; 28(5):629-36. PubMed ID: 17667771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Electrophysiological spread of excitation and pitch perception for dual and single electrodes using the Nucleus Freedom cochlear implant.
    Busby PA; Battmer RD; Pesch J
    Ear Hear; 2008 Dec; 29(6):853-64. PubMed ID: 18633324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Dual-electrode pitch discrimination with sequential interleaved stimulation by cochlear implant users.
    Kwon BJ; van den Honert C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 Jul; 120(1):EL1-6. PubMed ID: 16875252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Perceptual changes with monopolar and phantom electrode stimulation.
    Klawitter S; Landsberger DM; Büchner A; Nogueira W
    Hear Res; 2018 Mar; 359():64-75. PubMed ID: 29325874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Current steering with partial tripolar stimulation mode in cochlear implants.
    Wu CC; Luo X
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2013 Apr; 14(2):213-31. PubMed ID: 23250685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of interaural pitch matching and auditory image centering on binaural sensitivity in cochlear implant users.
    Kan A; Litovsky RY; Goupell MJ
    Ear Hear; 2015; 36(3):e62-8. PubMed ID: 25565660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Loudness and pitch perception using Dynamically Compensated Virtual Channels.
    Nogueira W; Litvak LM; Landsberger DM; Büchner A
    Hear Res; 2017 Feb; 344():223-234. PubMed ID: 27939418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Electrode ranking of "place pitch" and speech recognition in electrical hearing.
    Nelson DA; Van Tasell DJ; Schroder AC; Soli S; Levine S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1995 Oct; 98(4):1987-99. PubMed ID: 7593921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. New parallel stimulation strategies revisited: effect of synchronous multi electrode stimulation on rate discrimination in cochlear implant users.
    Bahmer A; Baumann U
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2013 Jun; 14(3):142-9. PubMed ID: 22733121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Threshold levels of dual electrode stimulation in cochlear implants.
    Snel-Bongers J; Briaire JJ; van der Veen EH; Kalkman RK; Frijns JH
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2013 Oct; 14(5):781-90. PubMed ID: 23695303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Depth and quality of electrode insertion: a radiologic and pitch scaling assessment of two cochlear implant systems.
    Chen JM; Farb R; Hanusaik L; Shipp D; Nedzelski JM
    Am J Otol; 1999 Mar; 20(2):192-7. PubMed ID: 10100522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Binaural Pitch Fusion in Bilateral Cochlear Implant Users.
    Reiss LAJ; Fowler JR; Hartling CL; Oh Y
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(2):390-397. PubMed ID: 28945657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.