These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

80 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16158645)

  • 41. Pitch is determined by naturally occurring periodic sounds.
    Schwartz DA; Purves D
    Hear Res; 2004 Aug; 194(1-2):31-46. PubMed ID: 15276674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. An evaluation of eight computer models of mammalian inner hair-cell function.
    Hewitt MJ; Meddis R
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1991 Aug; 90(2 Pt 1):904-17. PubMed ID: 1939895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Pitch detection of dynamic iterated rippled noise by humans and a modified auditory model.
    Denham S
    Biosystems; 2005; 79(1-3):199-206. PubMed ID: 15649605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. The effect of stimulus bandwidth on binaural loudness summation.
    Shao Z; Mo F; Mao D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Sep; 138(3):1508-14. PubMed ID: 26428788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Binaural prediction of speech intelligibility in reverberant rooms with multiple noise sources.
    Lavandier M; Jelfs S; Culling JF; Watkins AJ; Raimond AP; Makin SJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Jan; 131(1):218-31. PubMed ID: 22280586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Sound quality characteristics of refrigerator noise in real living environments with relation to psychoacoustical and autocorrelation function parameters.
    Sato S; You J; Jeon JY
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Jul; 122(1):314-25. PubMed ID: 17614491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Effects of simulated cochlear-implant processing on speech reception in fluctuating maskers.
    Qin MK; Oxenham AJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Jul; 114(1):446-54. PubMed ID: 12880055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. A computer model of auditory efferent suppression: implications for the recognition of speech in noise.
    Brown GJ; Ferry RT; Meddis R
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Feb; 127(2):943-54. PubMed ID: 20136217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Dichotic pitch activates pitch processing centre in Heschl's gyrus.
    Puschmann S; Uppenkamp S; Kollmeier B; Thiel CM
    Neuroimage; 2010 Jan; 49(2):1641-9. PubMed ID: 19782757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. A parametric study of cochlear input impedance.
    Puria S; Allen JB
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1991 Jan; 89(1):287-309. PubMed ID: 2002170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Spatial representations of temporal and spectral sound cues in human auditory cortex.
    Herdener M; Esposito F; Scheffler K; Schneider P; Logothetis NK; Uludag K; Kayser C
    Cortex; 2013; 49(10):2822-33. PubMed ID: 23706955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Concurrent encoding of frequency and amplitude modulation in human auditory cortex: encoding transition.
    Luo H; Wang Y; Poeppel D; Simon JZ
    J Neurophysiol; 2007 Dec; 98(6):3473-85. PubMed ID: 17898148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Coding of AM tones in the chinchilla auditory nerve: implications for the pitch of complex tones.
    Javel E
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1980 Jul; 68(1):133-46. PubMed ID: 7391355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Discrimination of changes in the spectral shape of noise bands.
    Versfeld NJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1997 Oct; 102(4):2264-75. PubMed ID: 9348684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Comment on "Optimum absorption and aperture parameters for realistic coupled volume spaces determined from computational analysis and subjective testing results" [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 127, 223-232 (2010)].
    Xiang N; Robinson P; Botts J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Nov; 128(5):2539-42. PubMed ID: 21110551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Detection of 1st- and 2nd-order temporal-envelope cues in a patient with left superior cortical damage.
    Füllgrabe C; Maillet D; Moroni C; Belin C; Lorenzi C
    Neurocase; 2004 Jun; 10(3):189-97. PubMed ID: 15788256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Processing of short auditory stimuli: the rapid audio sequential presentation paradigm (RASP).
    Suied C; Agus TR; Thorpe SJ; Pressnitzer D
    Adv Exp Med Biol; 2013; 787():443-51. PubMed ID: 23716251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Auditory perception of sound source velocity.
    Kaczmarek T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2005 May; 117(5):3149-56. PubMed ID: 15957782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Masking of complex sound--technical notes for realization of constant signal-noise-ratio.
    Ott R; Curio I
    Percept Mot Skills; 1999 Aug; 89(1):137-44. PubMed ID: 10544408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Frequency-place compression and expansion in cochlear implant listeners.
    Başkent D; Shannon RV
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 Nov; 116(5):3130-40. PubMed ID: 15603158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.