170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16158647)
21. Pupil dilation uncovers extra listening effort in the presence of a single-talker masker.
Koelewijn T; Zekveld AA; Festen JM; Kramer SE
Ear Hear; 2012; 33(2):291-300. PubMed ID: 21921797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Spatial release from masking based on binaural processing for up to six maskers.
Yost WA
J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Mar; 141(3):2093. PubMed ID: 28372135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Two-tone auditory suppression in younger and older normal-hearing adults and its relationship to speech perception in noise.
Sommers MS; Gehr SE
Hear Res; 2010 Jun; 264(1-2):56-62. PubMed ID: 20006694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Minimal upward spread of masking: correlations with speech and auditory brainstem response masked thresholds.
Klein AJ; Dubno JR
J Acoust Soc Am; 1993 Jun; 93(6):3422-30. PubMed ID: 8326068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Speech recognition in fluctuating and continuous maskers: effects of hearing loss and presentation level.
Summers V; Molis MR
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2004 Apr; 47(2):245-56. PubMed ID: 15157127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Word recognition for temporally and spectrally distorted materials: the effects of age and hearing loss.
Smith SL; Pichora-Fuller MK; Wilson RH; Macdonald EN
Ear Hear; 2012; 33(3):349-66. PubMed ID: 22343546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Development of Masked Speech Detection Thresholds in 2- to 15-year-old Children: Speech-Shaped Noise and Two-Talker Speech Maskers.
Bonino AY; Ramsey ME; Pancoast ES; Vance EA
Ear Hear; 2021 Nov-Dec 01; 42(6):1712-1726. PubMed ID: 33928913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Performance-intensity functions at absolute and masked thresholds.
Studebaker GA; Gilmore C; Sherbecoe RL
J Acoust Soc Am; 1993 Jun; 93(6):3418-21. PubMed ID: 8326067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Effect of masker modulation depth on speech masking release.
Gnansia D; Jourdes V; Lorenzi C
Hear Res; 2008 May; 239(1-2):60-8. PubMed ID: 18434049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Effects of masker envelope coherence on intensity discrimination.
Buss E; Hall JW
J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Nov; 126(5):2467-78. PubMed ID: 19894827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Impaired word recognition in noise by patients with noise-induced cochlear hearing loss: contribution of temporal resolution defect.
Phillips DP; Rappaport JM; Gulliver JM
Am J Otol; 1994 Sep; 15(5):679-86. PubMed ID: 8572072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Improving word recognition in noise among hearing-impaired subjects with a single-channel cochlear noise-reduction algorithm.
Fink N; Furst M; Muchnik C
J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Sep; 132(3):1718-31. PubMed ID: 22978899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. [Speech audiometric assessment of informational masking. German version].
Rählmann S; Meister H
HNO; 2017 Mar; 65(3):228-236. PubMed ID: 28054098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Asynchronous glimpsing of speech: spread of masking and task set-size.
Ozmeral EJ; Buss E; Hall JW
J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Aug; 132(2):1152-64. PubMed ID: 22894234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Spondee recognition in a two-talker masker and a speech-shaped noise masker in adults and children.
Hall JW; Grose JH; Buss E; Dev MB
Ear Hear; 2002 Apr; 23(2):159-65. PubMed ID: 11951851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Nonadditivity of forward and simultaneous masking.
Svec A; Joshi SN; Jesteadt W
J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Oct; 134(4):2866-75. PubMed ID: 24116423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Informational Masking Effects on Neural Encoding of Stimulus Onset and Acoustic Change.
Niemczak CE; Vander Werff KR
Ear Hear; 2019; 40(1):156-167. PubMed ID: 29782442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Effect of response context and masker type on word recognition in school-age children and adults.
Buss E; Leibold LJ; Hall JW
J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Aug; 140(2):968. PubMed ID: 27586729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Factors governing speech reception benefits of adaptive linear filtering for listeners with sensorineural hearing loss.
Rankovic CM
J Acoust Soc Am; 1998 Feb; 103(2):1043-57. PubMed ID: 9479758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. The effect of spatial separation on informational masking of speech in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
Arbogast TL; Mason CR; Kidd G
J Acoust Soc Am; 2005 Apr; 117(4 Pt 1):2169-80. PubMed ID: 15898658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
