These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

92 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16158652)

  • 1. On the relative importance of spatial and timbral fidelities in judgments of degraded multichannel audio quality.
    Rumsey F; Zieliński S; Kassier R; Bech S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2005 Aug; 118(2):968-76. PubMed ID: 16158652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Relationships between experienced listener ratings of multichannel audio quality and naïve listener preferences.
    Rumsey F; Zielinski S; Kassier R; Bech S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2005 Jun; 117(6):3832-40. PubMed ID: 16018485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Rapid Adaptation to the Timbre of Natural Sounds.
    Piazza EA; Theunissen FE; Wessel D; Whitney D
    Sci Rep; 2018 Sep; 8(1):13826. PubMed ID: 30218053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The relationship between basic audio quality and overall listening experience.
    Schoeffler M; Herre J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Sep; 140(3):2101. PubMed ID: 27914407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of multichannel reproduced sound: scaling auditory attributes underlying listener preference.
    Choisel S; Wickelmaier F
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Jan; 121(1):388-400. PubMed ID: 17297794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Using listener-based perceptual features as intermediate representations in music information retrieval.
    Friberg A; Schoonderwaldt E; Hedblad A; Fabiani M; Elowsson A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Oct; 136(4):1951-63. PubMed ID: 25324094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Music perception, pitch, and the auditory system.
    McDermott JH; Oxenham AJ
    Curr Opin Neurobiol; 2008 Aug; 18(4):452-63. PubMed ID: 18824100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assessment of sound quality perception in cochlear implant users during music listening.
    Roy AT; Jiradejvong P; Carver C; Limb CJ
    Otol Neurotol; 2012 Apr; 33(3):319-27. PubMed ID: 22314920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Validating a real-time perceptual model predicting distraction caused by audio-on-audio interference.
    Rämö J; Bech S; Jensen SH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2018 Jul; 144(1):153. PubMed ID: 30075674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Brightness scaling of periodic tones.
    Almeida A; Schubert E; Smith J; Wolfe J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 Oct; 79(7):1892-1896. PubMed ID: 28752284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A physiological ear model for the emulation of masking.
    Baumgarte F
    ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 1999; 61(5):294-304. PubMed ID: 10529651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Perception of musical tension for nontonal orchestral timbres and its relation to psychoacoustic roughness.
    Pressnitzer D; McAdams S; Winsberg S; Fineberg J
    Percept Psychophys; 2000 Jan; 62(1):66-80. PubMed ID: 10703256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. How We Hear: The Perception and Neural Coding of Sound.
    Oxenham AJ
    Annu Rev Psychol; 2018 Jan; 69():27-50. PubMed ID: 29035691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Zipf's law in short-time timbral codings of speech, music, and environmental sound signals.
    Haro M; Serrà J; Herrera P; Corral A
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(3):e33993. PubMed ID: 22479497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The relationship between the cross-correlation coefficient of two-channel acoustic signals and sound image quality.
    Kurozumi K; Ohgushi K
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1983 Dec; 74(6):1726-33. PubMed ID: 6655130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Perceptual thresholds for detecting modifications applied to the acoustical properties of a violin.
    Fritz C; Cross I; Moore BC; Woodhouse J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Dec; 122(6):3640-50. PubMed ID: 18247771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Perceived sound quality of reproductions with different frequency responses and sound levels.
    Gabrielsson A; Hagerman B; Bech-Kristensen T; Lundberg G
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1990 Sep; 88(3):1359-66. PubMed ID: 2229671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Improved speech reception and sound quality with the DUET2 audio processor for electric acoustic stimulation.
    Kleine Punte A; Mertens G; Cochet E; De Bodt M; Van de Heyning P
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2015; 135(10):1022-9. PubMed ID: 26073650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Music to electric ears: pitch and timbre perception by cochlear implant patients.
    Pressnitzer D; Bestel J; Fraysse B
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2005 Dec; 1060():343-5. PubMed ID: 16597784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Central mechanisms of the perception of sound signals of varying intensity in hard of hearing children].
    Belov IM; Zaĭtseva LM; Khrizman TP; Lomovatskaia LG
    Vestn Otorinolaringol; 1979; (4):59-65. PubMed ID: 384650
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.