These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16158656)

  • 21. Effects of amplification and speechreading on consonant recognition by persons with impaired hearing.
    Walden BE; Grant KW; Cord MT
    Ear Hear; 2001 Aug; 22(4):333-41. PubMed ID: 11527039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Investigating the MESA (multipoint electrotactile speech aid): the transmission of connected discourse.
    Sparks DW; Ardell LA; Bourgeois M; Wiedmer B; Kuhl PK
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1979 Mar; 65(3):810-5. PubMed ID: 447911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Measurement of performance of a peripheral vision lipreading aid.
    Kunov H; Ebrahimi D
    Scand Audiol; 1991; 20(2):131-7. PubMed ID: 1842278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Single band amplitude envelope cues as an aid to speechreading.
    Grant KW; Braida LD; Renn RJ
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 1991 Aug; 43(3):621-45. PubMed ID: 1775660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Audiovisual integration and lipreading abilities of older adults with normal and impaired hearing.
    Tye-Murray N; Sommers MS; Spehar B
    Ear Hear; 2007 Sep; 28(5):656-68. PubMed ID: 17804980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Vowel and consonant recognition of cochlear implant patients using formant-estimating speech processors.
    Blamey PJ; Dowell RC; Brown AM; Clark GM; Seligman PM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1987 Jul; 82(1):48-57. PubMed ID: 3624640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Controller design and consonantal contrast coding using a multi-finger tactual display.
    Israr A; Meckl PH; Reed CM; Tan HZ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Jun; 125(6):3925-35. PubMed ID: 19507975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Relations among different measures of speech reception in subjects using a cochlear implant.
    Rabinowitz WM; Eddington DK; Delhorne LA; Cuneo PA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 Oct; 92(4 Pt 1):1869-81. PubMed ID: 1401531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Continuing evaluation of the Queen's University tactile vocoder II: Identification of open set sentences and tracking narrative.
    Brooks PL; Frost BJ; Mason JL; Gibson DM
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1986 Jan; 23(1):129-38. PubMed ID: 3958994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Trimodal speech perception: how residual acoustic hearing supplements cochlear-implant consonant recognition in the presence of visual cues.
    Sheffield BM; Schuchman G; Bernstein JG
    Ear Hear; 2015; 36(3):e99-112. PubMed ID: 25514796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Discriminability and Perceptual Saliency of Temporal and Spectral Cues for Final Fricative Consonant Voicing in Simulated Cochlear-Implant and Bimodal Hearing.
    Kong YY; Winn MB; Poellmann K; Donaldson GS
    Trends Hear; 2016 Jun; 20():. PubMed ID: 27317666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Phonemic information transmitted by a multichannel electrotactile speech processor.
    Blamey PJ; Cowan RS; Alcantara JI; Clark GM
    J Speech Hear Res; 1988 Dec; 31(4):620-9. PubMed ID: 3230892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Peripheral vision lipreading aid.
    Ebrahimi D; Kunov H
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1991 Oct; 38(10):944-52. PubMed ID: 1837008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The contribution of fundamental frequency, amplitude envelope, and voicing duration cues to speechreading in normal-hearing subjects.
    Grant KW; Ardell LH; Kuhl PK; Sparks DW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1985 Feb; 77(2):671-7. PubMed ID: 3973238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Degradation of labial information modifies audiovisual speech perception in cochlear-implanted children.
    Huyse A; Berthommier F; Leybaert J
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(1):110-21. PubMed ID: 23059850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Auditory supplements to speechreading: combining amplitude envelope cues from different spectral regions of speech.
    Grant KW; Braida LD; Renn RJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1994 Feb; 95(2):1065-73. PubMed ID: 8132900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Assessment techniques to evaluate tactual aids for hearing-impaired subjects.
    Eilers RE; Widen JE; Oller DK
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1988; 25(2):33-46. PubMed ID: 3361459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The effects of vocoder filter configuration on tactual perception of speech.
    Eilers RE; Ozdamar O; Oller DK; Miskiel E; Urbano R
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1989; 26(4):51-64. PubMed ID: 2600868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. How hearing aids, background noise, and visual cues influence objective listening effort.
    Picou EM; Ricketts TA; Hornsby BW
    Ear Hear; 2013 Sep; 34(5):e52-64. PubMed ID: 23416751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Speech perception using combinations of auditory, visual, and tactile information.
    Blamey PJ; Cowan RS; Alcantara JI; Whitford LA; Clark GM
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1989; 26(1):15-24. PubMed ID: 2521904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.