195 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16158802)
1. Simplified and quantitative saliva buffer capacity test using a hand-held pH meter.
Kitasako Y; Moritsuka M; Foxton RM; Ikeda M; Tagami J; Nomura S
Am J Dent; 2005 Jun; 18(3):147-50. PubMed ID: 16158802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparative analysis of three commercial saliva testing kits with a standard saliva buffering test.
Kitasako Y; Burrow MF; Stacey M; Huq L; Reynolds EC; Tagami J
Aust Dent J; 2008 Jun; 53(2):140-4. PubMed ID: 18494969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Quantitative assessment for stimulated saliva flow rate and buffering capacity in relation to different ages.
Moritsuka M; Kitasako Y; Burrow MF; Ikeda M; Tagami J; Nomura S
J Dent; 2006 Oct; 34(9):716-20. PubMed ID: 16504365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Relationship between quantitative assessments of salivary buffering capacity and ion activity product for hydroxyapatite in relation to cariogenic potential.
Aiuchi H; Kitasako Y; Fukuda Y; Nakashima S; Burrow MF; Tagami J
Aust Dent J; 2008 Jun; 53(2):167-71. PubMed ID: 18494973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparative analysis of CRT Buffer, GC saliva check buffer tests and laboratory titration to evaluate saliva buffering capacity.
Maldupa I; Brinkmane A; Mihailova A
Stomatologija; 2011; 13(2):55-61. PubMed ID: 21822046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The pH change after HCl titration into resting and stimulated saliva for a buffering capacity test.
Moritsuka M; Kitasako Y; Burrow MF; Ikeda M; Tagami J
Aust Dent J; 2006 Jun; 51(2):170-4. PubMed ID: 16848266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A study on the relationship between selected oral environmental factors and the caries type in infants.
Onozawa H; Yasui T; Nakao S
Meikai Daigaku Shigaku Zasshi; 1990; 19(1):122-6. PubMed ID: 2134283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparative Quantitative Assessments of Salivary Ion Activity Product for Hydroxyapatite and Buffering Capacity in Children with Different Caries Experience.
Anand S; Masih U; Yeluri R
J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2016; 40(6):480-485. PubMed ID: 27805888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A colourimetric screening test for evaluation of the buffer capacity of saliva.
Frostell G
Swed Dent J; 1980; 4(3):81-6. PubMed ID: 6933707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of three strip-type tests and two laboratory methods for salivary buffering analysis.
Cheaib Z; Ganss C; Lamanda A; Turgut MD; Lussi A
Odontology; 2012 Jan; 100(1):67-75. PubMed ID: 21556727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A simplified caries risk test in stimulated saliva from elderly patients.
Sánchez-García S; Gutiérrez-Venegas G; Juárez-Cedillo T; Reyes-Morales H; Solórzano-Santos F; García-Peña C
Gerodontology; 2008 Mar; 25(1):26-33. PubMed ID: 18289130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A simplified quantitative test--adapted Checkbuf test--for resting saliva buffering capacity compared with a standard test.
Kitasako Y; Burrow MF; Huq LN; Stacey MA; Reynolds EC; Tagami J
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Oct; 108(4):551-6. PubMed ID: 19716730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Simplified method to estimate salivary buffer capacity.
Ericson D; Bratthall D
Scand J Dent Res; 1989 Oct; 97(5):405-7. PubMed ID: 2617139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Salivary pH in edentulous patients before and after wearing conventional dentures and implant overdentures: a clinical study.
Nikolopoulou F; Tzortzopoulou E
Implant Dent; 2007 Dec; 16(4):397-403. PubMed ID: 18091168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The effects of saliva on the erosive potential of three different wines.
Brand HS; Tjoe Fat GM; Veerman EC
Aust Dent J; 2009 Sep; 54(3):228-32. PubMed ID: 19709110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluating vaginal pH. Accuracy of two commercial pH papers in comparison to a hand-held digital pH meter.
Khandalavala J; Van Geem TA
J Reprod Med; 1999 Feb; 44(2):76-80. PubMed ID: 10853435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Salivary buffer capacity, pH, and stimulated flow rate of crack cocaine users.
Woyceichoski IE; Costa CH; de Araújo CM; Brancher JA; Resende LG; Vieira I; de Lima AA
J Investig Clin Dent; 2013 Aug; 4(3):160-3. PubMed ID: 23303615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Evaluation of caries activity using the micro-crystallization saliva index (IMK)].
Pancu G; Lăcătuşu S; Căruntu ID; Iovan G; Ghiorghe A
Rev Med Chir Soc Med Nat Iasi; 2006; 110(1):206-11. PubMed ID: 19292107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Influence of teas with fruit aroma and ice teas on pH and buffer capacity of saliva].
van Nieuw Amerongen A; van den Keijbus PA; Veerman EC
Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 2004 Mar; 111(3):80-4. PubMed ID: 15058242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Hand-held monitor of sympathetic nervous system using salivary amylase activity and its validation by driver fatigue assessment.
Yamaguchi M; Deguchi M; Wakasugi J; Ono S; Takai N; Higashi T; Mizuno Y
Biosens Bioelectron; 2006 Jan; 21(7):1007-14. PubMed ID: 15871919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
