These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

438 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16158811)

  • 1. Clinical effects of glass ionomer restorations on residual carious dentin in primary molars.
    Smales RJ; Ngo HC; Yip KH; Yu C
    Am J Dent; 2005 Jun; 18(3):188-93. PubMed ID: 16158811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Chemical exchange between glass-ionomer restorations and residual carious dentine in permanent molars: an in vivo study.
    Ngo HC; Mount G; Mc Intyre J; Tuisuva J; Von Doussa RJ
    J Dent; 2006 Sep; 34(8):608-13. PubMed ID: 16540227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An in vitro investigation of marginal dentine caries abutting composite resin and glass ionomer cement restorations.
    Knight GM; McIntyre JM; Craig GG; Mulyani ; Zilm PS; Gully NJ
    Aust Dent J; 2007 Sep; 52(3):187-92. PubMed ID: 17969286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Marginal microleakage of alternative restorative treatment and conventional glass ionomer restorations in extracted primary molars.
    Wadenya RO; Yego C; Mante FK
    J Dent Child (Chic); 2010; 77(1):32-5. PubMed ID: 20359427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Clinical evaluation of atraumatic restorations in primary molars: a comparison between 2 glass ionomer cements.
    Menezes JP; Rosenblatt A; Medeiros E
    J Dent Child (Chic); 2006; 73(2):91-7. PubMed ID: 16948370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Ion concentration adjacent to glass-ionomer restorations in primary molars.
    Bezerra AC; Novaes RC; Faber J; Frencken JE; Leal SC
    Dent Mater; 2012 Nov; 28(11):e259-63. PubMed ID: 22999372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Partial caries removal and cariostatic materials in carious primary molar teeth: a randomised controlled clinical trial.
    Foley J; Evans D; Blackwell A
    Br Dent J; 2004 Dec; 197(11):697-701; discussion 689. PubMed ID: 15592552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An in vitro comparison of marginal microleakage of alternative restorative treatment and conventional glass ionomer restorations in extracted permanent molars.
    Wadenya R; Mante FK
    Pediatr Dent; 2007; 29(4):303-7. PubMed ID: 17867395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Ultrastructural and microbiological analysis of the dentin layers affected by caries lesions in primary molars treated by minimal intervention.
    Wambier DS; dos Santos FA; Guedes-Pinto AC; Jaeger RG; Simionato MR
    Pediatr Dent; 2007; 29(3):228-34. PubMed ID: 17688020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Fluid flow after resin-composite restoration in extracted carious teeth.
    Banomyong D; Palamara JE; Messer HH; Burrow MF
    Eur J Oral Sci; 2009 Jun; 117(3):334-42. PubMed ID: 19583764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Resin-modified and conventional glass ionomer restorations in primary teeth: 8-year results.
    Qvist V; Manscher E; Teglers PT
    J Dent; 2004 May; 32(4):285-94. PubMed ID: 15053911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Electron probe microanalysis of ion exchange of selected elements between dentine and adhesive restorative materials.
    Knight GM; McIntyre JM; Craig GG; Mulyani
    Aust Dent J; 2007 Jun; 52(2):128-32. PubMed ID: 17687959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of resin-modified glass ionomer cements on secondary caries.
    Nagamine M; Itota T; Torii Y; Irie M; Staninec M; Inoue K
    Am J Dent; 1997 Aug; 10(4):173-8. PubMed ID: 9590903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Does low-cost GIC have the same survival rate as high-viscosity GIC in atraumatic restorative treatments? A RCT.
    Moura MS; Sousa GP; Brito MHSF; Silva MCC; Lima MDM; Moura LFAD; Lima CCB
    Braz Oral Res; 2020; 33():e125. PubMed ID: 31994598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Flowable glass ionomer cement as a liner: improving marginal adaptation of atraumatic restorative treatment restorations.
    Bonifácio CC; van Amerongen WE; Meschini TG; Raggio DP; Bönecker M
    J Dent Child (Chic); 2010; 77(1):12-6. PubMed ID: 20359424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A clinical, radiographic, and scanning electron microscopic evaluation of adhesive restorations on carious dentin in primary teeth.
    Ribeiro CC; Baratieri LN; Perdigão J; Baratieri NM; Ritter AV
    Quintessence Int; 1999 Sep; 30(9):591-9. PubMed ID: 10765864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Microhardness of dentine underlying ART restorations in primary molars: an in vivo pilot study.
    Santiago BM; Ventin DA; Primo LG; Barcelos R
    Br Dent J; 2005 Jul; 199(2):103-6. PubMed ID: 16041342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The influence of various conditioner agents on the interdiffusion zone and microleakage of a glass lonomer cement with a high viscosity in primary teeth.
    Yilmaz Y; Gurbuz T; Kocogullari ME
    Oper Dent; 2005; 30(1):105-12. PubMed ID: 15765965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Compound changes and tooth mineralization effects of glass ionomer cements containing bioactive glass (S53P4), an in vivo study.
    Yli-Urpo H; Närhi M; Närhi T
    Biomaterials; 2005 Oct; 26(30):5934-41. PubMed ID: 15958240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Observational: prospective study of indirect pulp treatment in primary molars using resin-modified glass ionomer and 2% chlorhexidine gluconate: a 12-month Follow-up.
    Rosenberg L; Atar M; Daronch M; Honig A; Chey M; Funny MD; Cruz L
    Pediatr Dent; 2013; 35(1):13-7. PubMed ID: 23635886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 22.