These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

91 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1615995)

  • 1. Acute childbirth morbidity: its measurement using hospital charges.
    Hage ML; Helms MJ; Dudley A; Stead WW; Hammond WE; Neyland C; Hammond CB
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1992 Jun; 166(6 Pt 1):1853-9; discussion 1859-62. PubMed ID: 1615995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Impact of cesarean section in a private health service in Brazil: indications and neonatal morbidity and mortality rates.
    Almeida MA; Araujo Júnior E; Camano L; Peixoto AB; Martins WP; Mattar R
    Ceska Gynekol; 2018; 83(1):4-10. PubMed ID: 29510632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Does a Cesarean section delivery always cost more than a vaginal delivery?
    Kazandjian VA; Chaulk CP; Ogunbo S; Wicker K
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2007 Feb; 13(1):16-20. PubMed ID: 17286718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The outcome of macrosomic infants weighing at least 4500 grams: Los Angeles County + University of Southern California experience.
    Lipscomb KR; Gregory K; Shaw K
    Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Apr; 85(4):558-64. PubMed ID: 7898833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Neonatal outcomes of twin pregnancy according to the planned mode of delivery.
    Schmitz T; Carnavalet Cde C; Azria E; Lopez E; Cabrol D; Goffinet F
    Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Mar; 111(3):695-703. PubMed ID: 18310373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An evaluation of the relative risks of a trial of labor versus elective repeat cesarean section.
    Hadley CB; Mennuti MT; Gabbe SG
    Am J Perinatol; 1986 Apr; 3(2):107-14. PubMed ID: 3964379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Perinatal and maternal morbidity and mortality after attempted operative vaginal delivery at midpelvic station.
    Muraca GM; Sabr Y; Lisonkova S; Skoll A; Brant R; Cundiff GW; Joseph KS
    CMAJ; 2017 Jun; 189(22):E764-E772. PubMed ID: 28584040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Changing rates of cesarean delivery: the Duke experience, 1978-1986.
    Hage ML; Helms MJ; Hammond WE; Hammond CB
    Obstet Gynecol; 1988 Jul; 72(1):98-101. PubMed ID: 3380513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Planned home versus planned hospital births in women at low-risk pregnancy: A systematic review with meta-analysis.
    Rossi AC; Prefumo F
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2018 Mar; 222():102-108. PubMed ID: 29408739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Labor and delivery outcomes among young adolescents.
    Torvie AJ; Callegari LS; Schiff MA; Debiec KE
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Jul; 213(1):95.e1-95.e8. PubMed ID: 25935776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Outcomes of Term Induction in Trial of Labor After Cesarean Delivery: Analysis of a Modern Obstetric Cohort.
    Lappen JR; Hackney DN; Bailit JL
    Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Jul; 126(1):115-23. PubMed ID: 26241264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of maternal and infant outcomes from primary cesarean delivery during the second compared with first stage of labor.
    Alexander JM; Leveno KJ; Rouse DJ; Landon MB; Gilbert S; Spong CY; Varner MW; Moawad AH; Caritis SN; Harper M; Wapner RJ; Sorokin Y; Miodovnik M; O'Sullivan MJ; Sibai BM; Langer O; Gabbe SG;
    Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Apr; 109(4):917-21. PubMed ID: 17400854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Do laborists improve delivery outcomes for laboring women in California community hospitals?
    Feldman DS; Bollman DL; Fridman M; Korst LM; El Haj Ibrahim S; Fink A; Gregory KD
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Oct; 213(4):587.e1-587.e13. PubMed ID: 26026921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Investigation on the approach of delivery after previous cesarean section of Xinjiang Uyghur women].
    Ding X; Aimainilezi A; Jin Y; Abudula W; Yin C
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2014 Oct; 49(10):736-40. PubMed ID: 25537243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Maternal and neonatal outcomes of attempted vaginal compared with planned cesarean delivery in triplet gestations.
    Lappen JR; Hackney DN; Bailit JL
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Oct; 215(4):493.e1-6. PubMed ID: 27166014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Vaginal birth after cesarean: a comparison of maternal and neonatal morbidity to elective repeat cesarean section.
    Eriksen NL; Buttino L
    Am J Perinatol; 1989 Oct; 6(4):375-9. PubMed ID: 2789534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Neonatal mortality for primary cesarean and vaginal births to low-risk women: application of an "intention-to-treat" model.
    MacDorman MF; Declercq E; Menacker F; Malloy MH
    Birth; 2008 Mar; 35(1):3-8. PubMed ID: 18307481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Serious maternal morbidity after childbirth: prolonged hospital stays and readmissions.
    Hebert PR; Reed G; Entman SS; Mitchel EF; Berg C; Griffin MR
    Obstet Gynecol; 1999 Dec; 94(6):942-7. PubMed ID: 10576180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Breech delivery: evaluation of the method of delivery on perinatal results and maternal morbidity.
    Bowes WA; Taylor ES; O'Brien M; Bowes C
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1979 Dec; 135(7):965-73. PubMed ID: 507136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Planned vaginal delivery following cesarean section.
    Merrill BS; Gibbs CE
    Obstet Gynecol; 1978 Jul; 52(1):50-2. PubMed ID: 683630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.