These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16160036)

  • 1. Genetic evaluation using parentage information from genetic markers.
    Dodds KG; Tate ML; Sise JA
    J Anim Sci; 2005 Oct; 83(10):2271-9. PubMed ID: 16160036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. DNA-based paternity analysis and genetic evaluation in a large, commercial cattle ranch setting.
    Van Eenennaam AL; Weaber RL; Drake DJ; Penedo MC; Quaas RL; Garrick DJ; Pollak EJ
    J Anim Sci; 2007 Dec; 85(12):3159-69. PubMed ID: 17878282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Modeling pedigree accuracy and uncertain parentage in single-step genomic evaluations of simulated and US Holstein datasets.
    Bradford HL; Masuda Y; Cole JB; Misztal I; VanRaden PM
    J Dairy Sci; 2019 Mar; 102(3):2308-2318. PubMed ID: 30639024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Development of a SNP panel dedicated to parentage assignment in French sheep populations.
    Tortereau F; Moreno CR; Tosser-Klopp G; Servin B; Raoul J
    BMC Genet; 2017 May; 18(1):50. PubMed ID: 28549462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A high throughput single nucleotide polymorphism multiplex assay for parentage assignment in New Zealand sheep.
    Clarke SM; Henry HM; Dodds KG; Jowett TW; Manley TR; Anderson RM; McEwan JC
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(4):e93392. PubMed ID: 24740141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of genotyping errors on parentage exclusion analysis.
    Wang J
    Mol Ecol; 2010 Nov; 19(22):5061-78. PubMed ID: 20964757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Identifying parentage using molecular markers: improving accuracy of studbook records for a captive flock of marabou storks (Leptoptilos crumeniferus).
    Ferrie GM; Cohen OR; Schutz P; Leighty KA; Plasse C; Bettinger TL; Hoffman EA
    Zoo Biol; 2013; 32(5):556-64. PubMed ID: 23959926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. How many markers are enough? Factors influencing parentage testing in different livestock populations.
    Strucken EM; Lee SH; Lee HK; Song KD; Gibson JP; Gondro C
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2016 Feb; 133(1):13-23. PubMed ID: 26234440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Genetic and economic effects of the increase in female paternal filiations by parentage assignment in sheep and goat breeding programs.
    Raoul J; Palhière I; Astruc JM; Elsen JM
    J Anim Sci; 2016 Sep; 94(9):3663-3683. PubMed ID: 27898915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Efficient computation of genotype probabilities for loci with many alleles: II. Iterative method for large, complex pedigrees.
    Thallman RM; Bennett GL; Keele JW; Kappes SM
    J Anim Sci; 2001 Jan; 79(1):34-44. PubMed ID: 11204712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Efficient parentage assignment and pedigree reconstruction with dense single nucleotide polymorphism data.
    Hayes BJ
    J Dairy Sci; 2011 Apr; 94(4):2114-7. PubMed ID: 21427003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Optimised parent selection and minimum inbreeding mating in small aquaculture breeding schemes: a simulation study.
    Hely FS; Amer PR; Walker SP; Symonds JE
    Animal; 2013 Jan; 7(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 23031385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. On marker-based parentage verification via non-linear optimization.
    Boerner V
    Genet Sel Evol; 2017 Jun; 49(1):50. PubMed ID: 28619083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Marker-assisted selection can reduce true as well as pedigree-estimated inbreeding.
    Pedersen LD; Sørensen AC; Berg P
    J Dairy Sci; 2009 May; 92(5):2214-23. PubMed ID: 19389980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Using genomic relationship likelihood for parentage assignment.
    Grashei KE; Ødegård J; Meuwissen THE
    Genet Sel Evol; 2018 May; 50(1):26. PubMed ID: 29776335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Analysis of microsatellites and parentage testing in saltwater crocodiles.
    Isberg SR; Chen Y; Barker SG; Moran C
    J Hered; 2004; 95(5):445-9. PubMed ID: 15388772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Genetic progress in multistage dairy cattle breeding schemes using genetic markers.
    Schrooten C; Bovenhuis H; van Arendonk JA; Bijma P
    J Dairy Sci; 2005 Apr; 88(4):1569-81. PubMed ID: 15778327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Efficient computation of genotype probabilities for loci with many alleles: I. Allelic peeling.
    Thallman RM; Bennett GL; Keele JW; Kappes SM
    J Anim Sci; 2001 Jan; 79(1):26-33. PubMed ID: 11204709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. SNPs for parentage testing and traceability in globally diverse breeds of sheep.
    Heaton MP; Leymaster KA; Kalbfleisch TS; Kijas JW; Clarke SM; McEwan J; Maddox JF; Basnayake V; Petrik DT; Simpson B; Smith TP; Chitko-McKown CG;
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(4):e94851. PubMed ID: 24740156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Genetic and economic benefits of selection based on performance recording and genotyping in lower tiers of multi-tiered sheep breeding schemes.
    Santos BF; van der Werf JH; Gibson JP; Byrne TJ; Amer PR
    Genet Sel Evol; 2017 Jan; 49(1):10. PubMed ID: 28095776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.