These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16160323)

  • 1. Usability evaluation of a laboratory order entry system: cognitive walkthrough and think aloud combined.
    Peute LW; Jaspers MM
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2005; 116():599-604. PubMed ID: 16160323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The significance of a usability evaluation of an emerging laboratory order entry system.
    Peute LW; Jaspers MW
    Int J Med Inform; 2007; 76(2-3):157-68. PubMed ID: 16854617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Optimizing the user interface of a data entry module for an electronic patient record for cardiac rehabilitation: A mixed method usability approach.
    van Engen-Verheul MM; Peute LW; de Keizer NF; Peek N; Jaspers MW
    Int J Med Inform; 2016 Mar; 87():15-26. PubMed ID: 26806708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Employing a user-centered cognitive walkthrough to evaluate a mHealth diabetes self-management application: A case study and beginning method validation.
    Georgsson M; Staggers N; Årsand E; Kushniruk A
    J Biomed Inform; 2019 Mar; 91():103110. PubMed ID: 30721757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A comparison of usability methods for testing interactive health technologies: methodological aspects and empirical evidence.
    Jaspers MW
    Int J Med Inform; 2009 May; 78(5):340-53. PubMed ID: 19046928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Determination of the effectiveness of two methods for usability evaluation using a CPOE medication ordering system.
    Khajouei R; Hasman A; Jaspers MW
    Int J Med Inform; 2011 May; 80(5):341-50. PubMed ID: 21435943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Usability evaluation of a computerized physician order entry for medication ordering.
    Khajouei R; de Jongh D; Jaspers MW
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2009; 150():532-6. PubMed ID: 19745368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The cognitive complexity of a provider order entry interface.
    Horsky J; Kaufman DR; Patel VL
    AMIA Annu Symp Proc; 2003; 2003():294-8. PubMed ID: 14728181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Usability evaluation with mental health professionals and young people to develop an Internet-based cognitive-behaviour therapy program for adolescents with anxiety disorders.
    Wozney L; Baxter P; Newton AS
    BMC Pediatr; 2015 Dec; 15():213. PubMed ID: 26675420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Integrating heuristic evaluation with cognitive walkthrough: development of a hybrid usability inspection method.
    Kushniruk AW; Monkman H; Tuden D; Bellwood P; Borycki EM
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2015; 208():221-5. PubMed ID: 25676977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The value of Retrospective and Concurrent Think Aloud in formative usability testing of a physician data query tool.
    Peute LW; de Keizer NF; Jaspers MW
    J Biomed Inform; 2015 Jun; 55():1-10. PubMed ID: 25733166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Usability evaluation of a nursing information system by applying cognitive walkthrough method.
    Farzandipour M; Nabovati E; Tadayon H; Sadeqi Jabali M
    Int J Med Inform; 2021 Aug; 152():104459. PubMed ID: 34091145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Reducing clinicians' cognitive workload by system redesign; a pre-post think aloud usability study.
    Peute LW; De Keizer NF; Van Der Zwan EP; Jaspers MW
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2011; 169():925-9. PubMed ID: 21893881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of heuristic and cognitive walkthrough usability evaluation methods for evaluating health information systems.
    Khajouei R; Zahiri Esfahani M; Jahani Y
    J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2017 Apr; 24(e1):e55-e60. PubMed ID: 27497799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Augmentation of the think aloud method with users' perspectives for the selection of a picture archiving and communication system.
    Zahiri Esfahani M; Khajouei R; Baneshi MR
    J Biomed Inform; 2018 Apr; 80():43-51. PubMed ID: 29501909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A cognitive systems engineering design approach to improve the usability of electronic order forms for medical consultation.
    Savoy A; Militello LG; Patel H; Flanagan ME; Russ AL; Daggy JK; Weiner M; Saleem JJ
    J Biomed Inform; 2018 Sep; 85():138-148. PubMed ID: 30071316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cognitive evaluation of a physician data query tool for a national ICU registry: comparing two think aloud variants and their application in redesign.
    Peute LW; de Keizer NF; Jaspers MW
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2010; 160(Pt 1):309-13. PubMed ID: 20841699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. "Think aloud" and "Near live" usability testing of two complex clinical decision support tools.
    Richardson S; Mishuris R; O'Connell A; Feldstein D; Hess R; Smith P; McCullagh L; McGinn T; Mann D
    Int J Med Inform; 2017 Oct; 106():1-8. PubMed ID: 28870378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Physician satisfaction with a critical care clinical information system using a multimethod evaluation of usability.
    Hudson D; Kushniruk A; Borycki E; Zuege DJ
    Int J Med Inform; 2018 Apr; 112():131-136. PubMed ID: 29500010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Uncovering healthcare practitioners' information processing using the think-aloud method: From paper-based guideline to clinical decision support system.
    Kilsdonk E; Peute LW; Riezebos RJ; Kremer LC; Jaspers MW
    Int J Med Inform; 2016 Feb; 86():10-9. PubMed ID: 26725690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.