210 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16160778)
1. Efficiency of modified H2S test for detection of faecal contamination in water.
Pathak SP; Gopal K
Environ Monit Assess; 2005 Sep; 108(1-3):59-65. PubMed ID: 16160778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A field test for the assessment of faecal contamination of potable water.
Jothikumar N; Rao KS
J Environ Monit; 2000 Apr; 2(2):183-5. PubMed ID: 11253040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of a simple screening test for the quality of drinking water systems.
Kaspar P; Guillen I; Rivelli D; Meza T; Velazquez G; Miño de Kaspar H; Pozzoli L; Nuñez C; Zoulek G
Trop Med Parasitol; 1992 Jun; 43(2):124-7. PubMed ID: 1519025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A simple field test for the detection of faecal pollution in drinking water.
Manja KS; Maurya MS; Rao KM
Bull World Health Organ; 1982; 60(5):797-801. PubMed ID: 6983930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Comparative studies of fresh and seawater for the determination of total coliform and fecal coliform bacteria according to the European Economic Community guideline 76/160 (bathing water) by the use of the most-probable-number method with BRILA-MUG broth and differentiation according to the drinking water ordinance].
Havemeister G; Aleksic S; Bockemühl J; Heinemeyer EA; Müller HE; Von Pritzbuer E
Zentralbl Hyg Umweltmed; 1991 May; 191(5-6):523-38. PubMed ID: 1883475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Suitability of the H2S method for testing untreated and chlorinated water supplies.
Nair J; Gibbs R; Mathew K; Ho GE
Water Sci Technol; 2001; 44(6):119-26. PubMed ID: 11700650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Most probable number methodology for quantifying dilute concentrations and fluxes of Salmonella in surface waters.
Jenkins MB; Endale DM; Fisher DS
J Appl Microbiol; 2008 Jun; 104(6):1562-8. PubMed ID: 18179540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Isolation of faecal coliform bacteria from the American alligator (Alligator mississippiensis).
Johnston MA; Porter DE; Scott GI; Rhodes WE; Webster LF
J Appl Microbiol; 2010 Mar; 108(3):965-973. PubMed ID: 19735329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. An evaluation of the hydrogen sulphide water screening test and coliform counts for water quality assessment in rural Malaysia.
Desmarchelier P; Lew A; Caique W; Knight S; Toodayan W; Isa AR; Barnes A
Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg; 1992; 86(4):448-50. PubMed ID: 1440833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of four membrane filter media in anaerobic-MF recovery of faecal coliforms from freshwater in Nigeria.
Ogan MT
J Appl Bacteriol; 1992 Aug; 73(2):168-74. PubMed ID: 1399909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of a quantitative H2S MPN test for fecal microbes analysis of water using biochemical and molecular identification.
McMahan L; Grunden AM; Devine AA; Sobsey MD
Water Res; 2012 Apr; 46(6):1693-704. PubMed ID: 22244995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The H(2)S test versus standard indicator bacteria tests for faecal contamination of water: systematic review and meta-analysis.
Wright JA; Yang H; Walker K; Pedley S; Elliott J; Gundry SW
Trop Med Int Health; 2012 Jan; 17(1):94-105. PubMed ID: 21951335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Factors affecting microbial and physico-chemical pollutants in stormwater in a typical Chinese urban catchment.
Hou X; Chen L; Wei G; Gong Y; Shen Z
Environ Sci Process Impacts; 2018 Dec; 20(12):1697-1707. PubMed ID: 30288511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Coliform dynamics and the implications for source tracking.
Barnes B; Gordon DM
Environ Microbiol; 2004 May; 6(5):501-9. PubMed ID: 15049923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The relationships between salmonellas and faecal indicator concentrations in two pools in the Australian wet/dry tropics.
Townsend SA
J Appl Bacteriol; 1992 Aug; 73(2):182-8. PubMed ID: 1399911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Enumeration of Escherichia coli and coliforms in surface water by multiple tube fermentation and membrane filter methods.
Grasso GM; Sammarco ML; Ripabelli G; Fanelli I
Microbios; 2000; 103(405):119-25. PubMed ID: 11092193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Hydrogen sulphide production tests and the detection of groundwater faecal contamination by septic seepage.
Roser DJ; Ashbolt N; Ho G; Mathew K; Nair J; Ryken-Rapp D; Toze S
Water Sci Technol; 2005; 51(10):291-300. PubMed ID: 16104433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Occurrence and densities of bacteriophages proposed as indicators and bacterial indicators in river waters from Europe and South America.
Lucena F; Méndez X; Morón A; Calderón E; Campos C; Guerrero A; Cárdenas M; Gantzer C; Shwartzbrood L; Skraber S; Jofre J
J Appl Microbiol; 2003; 94(5):808-15. PubMed ID: 12694445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Soil: the environmental source of Escherichia coli and Enterococci in Guam's streams.
Fujioka R; Sian-Denton C; Borja M; Castro J; Morphew K
J Appl Microbiol; 1998 Dec; 85 Suppl 1():83S-89S. PubMed ID: 21182696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Coliform species recovered from untreated surface water and drinking water by the membrane filter, standard, and modified most-probable-number techniques.
Evans TM; LeChevallier MW; Waarvick CE; Seidler RJ
Appl Environ Microbiol; 1981 Mar; 41(3):657-63. PubMed ID: 7013706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
