These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16161472)

  • 21. Evidence for language transfer leading to a perceptual advantage for non-native listeners.
    Chang CB; Mishler A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Oct; 132(4):2700-10. PubMed ID: 23039462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Cross-language specialization in phonetic processing: English and Hindi perception of /w/-/v/ speech and nonspeech.
    Iverson P; Wagner A; Pinet M; Rosen S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Nov; 130(5):EL297-303. PubMed ID: 22088031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Plasticity of illusory vowel perception in Brazilian-Japanese bilinguals.
    Parlato-Oliveira E; Christophe A; Hirose Y; Dupoux E
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Jun; 127(6):3738-48. PubMed ID: 20550272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Perceptual processing of Mandarin nasals by L1 and L2 Mandarin speakers.
    Lai YH
    J Psycholinguist Res; 2012 Aug; 41(4):237-52. PubMed ID: 22089521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Quantifying the role of rhythm in infants' language discrimination abilities: A meta-analysis.
    Gasparini L; Langus A; Tsuji S; Boll-Avetisyan N
    Cognition; 2021 Aug; 213():104757. PubMed ID: 34045072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The perception of phonological quantity based on durational cues by native speakers, second-language users and nonspeakers of Finnish.
    Ylinen S; Shestakova A; Alku P; Huotilainen M
    Lang Speech; 2005; 48(Pt 3):313-38. PubMed ID: 16416940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Phonetic perceptual identification by native- and second-language speakers differentially activates brain regions involved with acoustic phonetic processing and those involved with articulatory-auditory/orosensory internal models.
    Callan DE; Jones JA; Callan AM; Akahane-Yamada R
    Neuroimage; 2004 Jul; 22(3):1182-94. PubMed ID: 15219590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Temporal variability and stability in infant-directed sung speech: evidence for language-specific patterns.
    Falk S
    Lang Speech; 2011 Jun; 54(Pt 2):167-80. PubMed ID: 21848078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Non-native phonetic learning is destabilized by exposure to phonological variability before and after training.
    Fuhrmeister P; Myers EB
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Nov; 142(5):EL448. PubMed ID: 29195416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Fluency-related Temporal Features and Syllable Prominence as Prosodic Proficiency Predictors for Learners of English with Different Language Backgrounds.
    Kallio H; Suni A; Šimko J
    Lang Speech; 2022 Sep; 65(3):571-597. PubMed ID: 34479458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Learning at a distance I. Statistical learning of non-adjacent dependencies.
    Newport EL; Aslin RN
    Cogn Psychol; 2004 Mar; 48(2):127-62. PubMed ID: 14732409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Production of phonetic and phonological contrast by heritage speakers of Mandarin.
    Chang CB; Yao Y; Haynes EF; Rhodes R
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Jun; 129(6):3964-80. PubMed ID: 21682418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Cross-language acoustic similarity predicts perceptual assimilation of Canadian English and Canadian French vowels.
    Escudero P; Vasiliev P
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Nov; 130(5):EL277-83. PubMed ID: 22088028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Acoustic variability within and across German, French, and American English vowels: phonetic context effects.
    Strange W; Weber A; Levy ES; Shafiro V; Hisagi M; Nishi K
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Aug; 122(2):1111-29. PubMed ID: 17672658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Prosodic boundary information modulates phonetic categorization.
    Kim S; Cho T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Jul; 134(1):EL19-25. PubMed ID: 23862901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The acquisition of speech rhythm by bilingual spanish- and english-speaking 4- and 5-year-old children.
    Bunta F; Ingram D
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2007 Aug; 50(4):999-1014. PubMed ID: 17675601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Phonetic similarity of /s/ in native and second language: Individual differences in learning curves.
    Quené H; Orr R; van Leeuwen D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Dec; 142(6):EL519. PubMed ID: 29289115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Early Speech Segmentation in French-learning Infants: Monosyllabic Words versus Embedded Syllables.
    Nishibayashi LL; Goyet L; Nazzi T
    Lang Speech; 2015 Sep; 58(Pt 3):334-50. PubMed ID: 26529900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The effect of L1 orthography on non-native vowel perception.
    Escudero P; Wanrooij K
    Lang Speech; 2010; 53(Pt 3):343-65. PubMed ID: 21033651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The language dependency of /m/ in native Dutch and non-native English.
    de Boer MM; Heeren WFL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2023 Oct; 154(4):2168-2176. PubMed ID: 37811992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.