BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

215 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16161800)

  • 1. Measurement error and confidence intervals for ROC curves.
    Tosteson TD; Buonaccorsi JP; Demidenko E; Wells WA
    Biom J; 2005 Aug; 47(4):409-16. PubMed ID: 16161800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Estimation of the Youden Index and its associated cutoff point.
    Fluss R; Faraggi D; Reiser B
    Biom J; 2005 Aug; 47(4):458-72. PubMed ID: 16161804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Estimating the Area Under ROC Curve When the Fitted Binormal Curves Demonstrate Improper Shape.
    Bandos AI; Guo B; Gur D
    Acad Radiol; 2017 Feb; 24(2):209-219. PubMed ID: 27884464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The Youden Index and the optimal cut-point corrected for measurement error.
    Perkins NJ; Schisterman EF
    Biom J; 2005 Aug; 47(4):428-41. PubMed ID: 16161802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A Bayesian hierarchical non-linear regression model in receiver operating characteristic analysis of clustered continuous diagnostic data.
    Zou KH; O'Malley AJ
    Biom J; 2005 Aug; 47(4):417-27. PubMed ID: 16161801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A new parametric method based on S-distributions for computing receiver operating characteristic curves for continuous diagnostic tests.
    Sorribas A; March J; Trujillano J
    Stat Med; 2002 May; 21(9):1213-35. PubMed ID: 12111875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Nonparametric estimation of ROC curves in the absence of a gold standard.
    Zhou XH; Castelluccio P; Zhou C
    Biometrics; 2005 Jun; 61(2):600-9. PubMed ID: 16011710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Minimum-norm estimation for binormal receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves.
    Davidov O; Nov Y
    Biom J; 2009 Dec; 51(6):1030-46. PubMed ID: 19894216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparing the likelihood ratios of two binary diagnostic tests in the presence of partial verification.
    Roldán Nofuentes JA; Luna del Castillo JD
    Biom J; 2005 Aug; 47(4):442-57. PubMed ID: 16161803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Adjustment for measurement error in evaluating diagnostic biomarkers by using an internal reliability sample.
    White MT; Xie SX
    Stat Med; 2013 Nov; 32(27):4709-25. PubMed ID: 23765915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Interval estimation for the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve when data are subject to error.
    Li Y; Koval JJ; Donner A; Zou GY
    Stat Med; 2010 Oct; 29(24):2521-31. PubMed ID: 20684006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Smooth semiparametric receiver operating characteristic curves for continuous diagnostic tests.
    Wan S; Zhang B
    Stat Med; 2007 May; 26(12):2565-86. PubMed ID: 17072821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Smooth non-parametric receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves for continuous diagnostic tests.
    Zou KH; Hall WJ; Shapiro DE
    Stat Med; 1997 Oct; 16(19):2143-56. PubMed ID: 9330425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Resampling techniques in the analysis of non-binormal ROC data.
    Mossman D
    Med Decis Making; 1995; 15(4):358-66. PubMed ID: 8544679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of semiparametric, parametric, and nonparametric ROC analysis for continuous diagnostic tests using a simulation study and acute coronary syndrome data.
    Colak E; Mutlu F; Bal C; Oner S; Ozdamar K; Gok B; Cavusoglu Y
    Comput Math Methods Med; 2012; 2012():698320. PubMed ID: 22844346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Bayesian bootstrap estimation of ROC curve.
    Gu J; Ghosal S; Roy A
    Stat Med; 2008 Nov; 27(26):5407-20. PubMed ID: 18613217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A parametric comparison of diagnostic accuracy with three ordinal diagnostic groups.
    Xiong C; van Belle G; Miller JP; Yan Y; Gao F; Yu K; Morris JC
    Biom J; 2007 Aug; 49(5):682-93. PubMed ID: 17763377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An ROC-type measure of diagnostic accuracy when the gold standard is continuous-scale.
    Obuchowski NA
    Stat Med; 2006 Feb; 25(3):481-93. PubMed ID: 16287217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Power calculation for comparing diagnostic accuracies in a multi-reader, multi-test design.
    Kim E; Zhang Z; Wang Y; Zeng D
    Biometrics; 2014 Dec; 70(4):1033-41. PubMed ID: 25355470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A permutation test for comparing ROC curves in multireader studies a multi-reader ROC, permutation test.
    Bandos AI; Rockette HE; Gur D
    Acad Radiol; 2006 Apr; 13(4):414-20. PubMed ID: 16554220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.