215 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16161800)
21. Construction of confidence regions in the ROC space after the estimation of the optimal Youden index-based cut-off point.
Bantis LE; Nakas CT; Reiser B
Biometrics; 2014 Mar; 70(1):212-23. PubMed ID: 24261514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. The effect of random measurement error on receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves.
Faraggi D
Stat Med; 2000 Jan; 19(1):61-70. PubMed ID: 10623913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Regularized binormal ROC method in disease classification using microarray data.
Ma S; Song X; Huang J
BMC Bioinformatics; 2006 May; 7():253. PubMed ID: 16684357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. New nonparametric confidence intervals for the Youden index.
Zhou H; Qin G
J Biopharm Stat; 2012; 22(6):1244-57. PubMed ID: 23075020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. A comparison of confidence/credible interval methods for the area under the ROC curve for continuous diagnostic tests with small sample size.
Feng D; Cortese G; Baumgartner R
Stat Methods Med Res; 2017 Dec; 26(6):2603-2621. PubMed ID: 26323286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Sample size determination for diagnostic accuracy studies involving binormal ROC curve indices.
Obuchowski NA; McClish DK
Stat Med; 1997 Jul; 16(13):1529-42. PubMed ID: 9249923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. A GEE approach to estimating accuracy and its confidence intervals for correlated data.
Lim Y
Pharm Stat; 2020 Jan; 19(1):59-70. PubMed ID: 31448536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. A marginal model approach for analysis of multi-reader multi-test receiver operating characteristic (ROC) data.
Song X; Zhou XH
Biostatistics; 2005 Apr; 6(2):303-12. PubMed ID: 15772108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Measuring and estimating diagnostic accuracy when there are three ordinal diagnostic groups.
Xiong C; van Belle G; Miller JP; Morris JC
Stat Med; 2006 Apr; 25(7):1251-73. PubMed ID: 16345029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Equivalence of binormal likelihood-ratio and bi-chi-squared ROC curve models.
Hillis SL
Stat Med; 2016 May; 35(12):2031-57. PubMed ID: 26608405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Fuzzy receiver operating characteristic curve: an option to evaluate diagnostic tests.
Castanho MJ; Barros LC; Yamakami A; Vendite LL
IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed; 2007 May; 11(3):244-50. PubMed ID: 17521074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Using confidence intervals to compare several correlated areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves.
Zou GY; Yue L
Stat Med; 2013 Dec; 32(29):5077-90. PubMed ID: 23824874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Interval estimation for the difference in paired areas under the ROC curves in the absence of a gold standard test.
Hsieh HN; Su HY; Zhou XH
Stat Med; 2009 Nov; 28(25):3108-23. PubMed ID: 19691022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. The Youden Index in the Generalized Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve Context.
MartÃnez-Camblor P; Pardo-Fernández JC
Int J Biostat; 2019 Apr; 15(1):. PubMed ID: 30943172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Statistical methods for the meta-analysis of diagnostic tests must take into account the use of surrogate standards.
Kang J; Brant R; Ghali WA
J Clin Epidemiol; 2013 May; 66(5):566-574.e1. PubMed ID: 23466018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. The use of receiver operating characteristic curves in biomedical informatics.
Lasko TA; Bhagwat JG; Zou KH; Ohno-Machado L
J Biomed Inform; 2005 Oct; 38(5):404-15. PubMed ID: 16198999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Limitations to the robustness of binormal ROC curves: effects of model misspecification and location of decision thresholds on bias, precision, size and power.
Walsh SJ
Stat Med; 1997 Mar; 16(6):669-79. PubMed ID: 9131755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Comparison of Paired ROC Curves through a Two-Stage Test.
Yu W; Park E; Chang YC
J Biopharm Stat; 2015; 25(5):881-902. PubMed ID: 24905904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Statistical inference for the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve in the presence of random measurement error.
Schisterman EF; Faraggi D; Reiser B; Trevisan M
Am J Epidemiol; 2001 Jul; 154(2):174-9. PubMed ID: 11447052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Estimation of the ROC curve under verification bias.
Fluss R; Reiser B; Faraggi D; Rotnitzky A
Biom J; 2009 Jun; 51(3):475-90. PubMed ID: 19588455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
