These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
5. The role of recollection and partial information in source monitoring. Hicks JL; Marsh RL; Ritschel L J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2002 May; 28(3):503-8. PubMed ID: 12018502 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Reducing the Effects of Performance Expectations on Behavioral Ratings. Baltes BB; Parker CP Organ Behav Hum Decis Process; 2000 Jul; 82(2):237-267. PubMed ID: 10891297 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Contributions of parental and social influences to cannabis use in a non-clinical sample of adolescents]. Chabrol H; Mabila JD; Chauchard E; Mantoulan R; Rousseau A Encephale; 2008 Jan; 34(1):8-16. PubMed ID: 18514145 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Boundaries of the relation between conscious recollection and source memory for perceptual details. Meiser T; Sattler C Conscious Cogn; 2007 Mar; 16(1):189-210. PubMed ID: 16725348 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The new GRID Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression demonstrates excellent inter-rater reliability for inexperienced and experienced raters before and after training. Tabuse H; Kalali A; Azuma H; Ozaki N; Iwata N; Naitoh H; Higuchi T; Kanba S; Shioe K; Akechi T; Furukawa TA Psychiatry Res; 2007 Sep; 153(1):61-7. PubMed ID: 17445908 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Features and feedback: enhancing metamnemonic knowledge at retrieval reduces source-monitoring errors. Lane SM; Roussel CC; Villa D; Morita SK J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Nov; 33(6):1131-42. PubMed ID: 17983318 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Rater-based assessments as social judgments: rethinking the etiology of rater errors. Gingerich A; Regehr G; Eva KW Acad Med; 2011 Oct; 86(10 Suppl):S1-7. PubMed ID: 21955759 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The influence of instructions and terminology on the accuracy of remember-know judgments. McCabe DP; Geraci LD Conscious Cogn; 2009 Jun; 18(2):401-13. PubMed ID: 19344688 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Construct validity and vulnerability to anxiety: a cognitive interviewing study of the revised Anxiety Sensitivity Index. Brown GP; Hawkes NC; Tata P J Anxiety Disord; 2009 Oct; 23(7):942-9. PubMed ID: 19586752 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Testing for potential contextual bias effects during the verification stage of the ACE-V methodology when conducting fingerprint comparisons. Langenburg G; Champod C; Wertheim P J Forensic Sci; 2009 May; 54(3):571-82. PubMed ID: 19432737 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Information quantity and quality affect the realistic accuracy of personality judgment. Letzring TD; Wells SM; Funder DC J Pers Soc Psychol; 2006 Jul; 91(1):111-23. PubMed ID: 16834483 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Using frame-of-reference training to understand the implications of rater idiosyncrasy for rating accuracy. Uggerslev KL; Sulsky LM J Appl Psychol; 2008 May; 93(3):711-9. PubMed ID: 18457499 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]