These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

328 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16162417)

  • 1. Ultrasonic control of ceramic membrane fouling by particles: effect of ultrasonic factors.
    Chen D; Weavers LK; Walker HW
    Ultrason Sonochem; 2006 Jul; 13(5):379-87. PubMed ID: 16162417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Ultrasonic control of ceramic membrane fouling: Effect of particle characteristics.
    Chen D; Weavers LK; Walker HW
    Water Res; 2006 Feb; 40(4):840-50. PubMed ID: 16442583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Experimental aspects of ultrasonically enhanced cross-flow membrane filtration of industrial wastewater.
    Kyllönen H; Pirkonen P; Nyström M; Nuortila-Jokinen J; Grönroos A
    Ultrason Sonochem; 2006 May; 13(4):295-302. PubMed ID: 16005253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The optimisation of ultrasonic cleaning procedures for dairy fouled ultrafiltration membranes.
    Muthukumaran S; Kentish S; Lalchandani S; Ashokkumar M; Mawson R; Stevens GW; Grieser F
    Ultrason Sonochem; 2005 Jan; 12(1-2):29-35. PubMed ID: 15474949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Ceramic membrane ultrafiltration of natural surface water with ultrasound enhanced backwashing.
    Boley A; Narasimhan K; Kieninger M; Müller WR
    Water Sci Technol; 2010; 61(5):1121-7. PubMed ID: 20220233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Ultrasound irradiation combined with hydraulic cleaning on fouled polyethersulfone and polyvinylidene fluoride membranes.
    Wan MW; Reguyal F; Futalan C; Yang HL; Kan CC
    Environ Technol; 2013; 34(21-24):2929-37. PubMed ID: 24617052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Ultrasound-membrane hybrid processes for enhancement of filtration properties.
    Latt KK; Kobayashi T
    Ultrason Sonochem; 2006 May; 13(4):321-8. PubMed ID: 16011904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A crossflow filtration system for constant permeate flux membrane fouling characterization.
    Miller DJ; Paul DR; Freeman BD
    Rev Sci Instrum; 2013 Mar; 84(3):035003. PubMed ID: 23556842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of ozonation on the permeate flux of nanocrystalline ceramic membranes.
    Karnik BS; Davies SH; Chen KC; Jaglowski DR; Baumann MJ; Masten SJ
    Water Res; 2005 Feb; 39(4):728-34. PubMed ID: 15707646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Control of fouling formation in membrane ultrafiltration by ultrasound irradiation.
    Naddeo V; Belgiorno V; Borea L; Secondes MF; Ballesteros F
    Environ Technol; 2015; 36(9-12):1299-307. PubMed ID: 25384626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Natural organic matter fouling of low-pressure, hollow-fiber membranes: Effects of NOM source and hydrodynamic conditions.
    Huang H; Lee N; Young T; Gary A; Lozier JC; Jacangelo JG
    Water Res; 2007 Sep; 41(17):3823-32. PubMed ID: 17644151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Irreversible membrane fouling during ultrafiltration of surface water.
    Kimura K; Hane Y; Watanabe Y; Amy G; Ohkuma N
    Water Res; 2004; 38(14-15):3431-41. PubMed ID: 15276760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The use of nanoparticles in polymeric and ceramic membrane structures: review of manufacturing procedures and performance improvement for water treatment.
    Kim J; Van der Bruggen B
    Environ Pollut; 2010 Jul; 158(7):2335-49. PubMed ID: 20430495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Influence of module configuration and hydrodynamics in water clarification by immersed membrane systems.
    Sridang PC; Heran M; Grasmick A
    Water Sci Technol; 2005; 51(6-7):135-42. PubMed ID: 16003971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Organic colloids and their influence on low-pressure membrane filtration.
    Laabs C; Amy G; Jekel M
    Water Sci Technol; 2004; 50(12):311-6. PubMed ID: 15686036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. New parameter for monitoring fouling during ultrafiltration of WWTP effluent.
    Roorda JH; van der Graaf JH
    Water Sci Technol; 2001; 43(10):241-8. PubMed ID: 11436787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The substitution of sand filtration by immersed-UF for surface water treatment: pilot-scale studies.
    Lihua S; Xing L; Guoyu Z; Jie C; Zhe X; Guibai L
    Water Sci Technol; 2009; 60(9):2337-43. PubMed ID: 19901465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Removal of phenyl-urea herbicides in ultrapure water by ultrafiltration and nanofiltration processes.
    Benitez FJ; Acero JL; Real FJ; Garcia C
    Water Res; 2009 Feb; 43(2):267-76. PubMed ID: 18947854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Complexity of ultrafiltration membrane fouling caused by macromolecular dissolved organic compounds in secondary effluents.
    Haberkamp J; Ernst M; Böckelmann U; Szewzyk U; Jekel M
    Water Res; 2008 Jun; 42(12):3153-61. PubMed ID: 18423516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Impact of feed water acidification with weak and strong acids on colloidal silica fouling in ultrafiltration membrane processes.
    Singh G; Song L
    Water Res; 2008 Feb; 42(3):707-13. PubMed ID: 17709127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.