161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16163047)
1. Intravenous injection of high and medium concentrations of computed tomography contrast media and related heat sensation, local pain, and adverse reactions.
Masui T; Katayama M; Kobayashi S; Sakahara H
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2005; 29(5):704-8. PubMed ID: 16163047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Heart rate variability and heat sensation during CT coronary angiography: Low-osmolar versus iso-osmolar contrast media.
Svensson A; Ripsweden J; Rück A; Aspelin P; Cederlund K; Brismar BT
Acta Radiol; 2010 Sep; 51(7):722-6. PubMed ID: 20568977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effect of Different Iodine Concentrations on Patient-Reported Discomfort in Contrast-Enhanced Computed Tomography: A Prospective Comparative Trial.
Vahldiek JL; Schaafs LA; Niehues BK; Hamm B; Niehues SM
Rofo; 2020 Oct; 192(10):945-951. PubMed ID: 32215899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of the radiographic efficacy of iomeprol.
Kozuka T; Katayama H; Ebata K
Eur J Radiol; 1994 May; 18 Suppl 1():S109-14. PubMed ID: 8020512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Assessment of the side-effects of iomeprol.
Katayama H; Kozuka T; Ebata K
Eur J Radiol; 1994 May; 18 Suppl 1():S115-9. PubMed ID: 8020513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of the acute adverse reaction of contrast medium with high and moderate iodine concentration in patients undergoing computed tomography.
Nagamoto M; Gomi T; Terada H; Terada S; Kohda E
Radiat Med; 2006 Dec; 24(10):669-74. PubMed ID: 17186321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Pain in femoral arteriography. A double-blind, randomized, clinical study comparing safety and efficacy of the iso-osmolar iodixanol 270 mgI/ml and the low-osmolar iomeprol 300 mgI/ml in 9 European centers.
Manke C; Marcus C; Page A; Puey J; Batakis O; Fog A
Acta Radiol; 2003 Nov; 44(6):590-6. PubMed ID: 14616202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of patient comfort between iodixanol and iopamidol in contrast-enhanced computed tomography of the abdomen and pelvis: a randomized trial.
Weiland FL; Marti-Bonmati L; Lim L; Becker HC
Acta Radiol; 2014 Jul; 55(6):715-24. PubMed ID: 24060817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A prospective randomised controlled trial to determine the early and late reactions after the use of iopamidol 340 (Niopam) and iomeprol 350 (Iomeron) in cardiac catheterisation.
Vijayalakshmi K; Kunadian B; Wright RA; Hall JA; Stewart MJ; Davies A; Sutton A; de Belder MA
Eur J Radiol; 2007 Feb; 61(2):342-50. PubMed ID: 17101256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Iomeprol versus iopamidol in contrast-enhanced computed tomography of thoracic and abdominal organs.
Valentini AL; Tartaglione T; Monti L; Marano P
Eur J Radiol; 1994 May; 18 Suppl 1():S88-92. PubMed ID: 8020525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Sensation of smell and taste during intravenous injection of iodinated contrast media in CT examinations.
Yamaguchi N; Fukushima Y; Yamaguchi A; Nagasawa N; Taketomi-Takahashi A; Suto T; Tsushima Y
Br J Radiol; 2017 Jan; 90(1069):20160629. PubMed ID: 27805431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of enhancement, image quality, cost, and adverse reactions using 2 different contrast medium concentrations for routine chest CT on 16-slice MDCT.
Setty BN; Sahani DV; Ouellette-Piazzo K; Hahn PF; Shepard JA
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2006; 30(5):818-22. PubMed ID: 16954936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Relationship between oral food intake and nausea caused by intravenous injection of iodinated contrast material].
Oowaki K; Saigusa H; Ojiri H; Ariizumi M; Yamagisi J; Fukuda K; Tada S
Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1994 May; 54(6):476-9. PubMed ID: 8028954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Prevalence of acute reactions to iopromide: postmarketing surveillance study of 74,717 patients.
Kopp AF; Mortele KJ; Cho YD; Palkowitsch P; Bettmann MA; Claussen CD
Acta Radiol; 2008 Oct; 49(8):902-11. PubMed ID: 18651252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Patient Discomfort during Carotid Artery Stenting: A Comparison Study between Iodixanol versus Iopamidol.
Borrelli MP; Setacci F; de Donato G; Galzerano G; Benevento D; Mele M; Rosadini D; Messina G; Setacci C
Ann Vasc Surg; 2017 Feb; 39():167-172. PubMed ID: 27521830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A comparison of the efficacy and safety of iopamidol-370 and iodixanol-320 in patients undergoing multidetector-row computed tomography.
Sahani DV; Soulez G; Chen KM; Lepanto L; Xu JR; Nelson RC; Grazioli L; Vanzulli A; Heiken JP;
Invest Radiol; 2007 Dec; 42(12):856-61. PubMed ID: 18007158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Contrast bolus optimization for cardiac 16-slice computed tomography: comparison of contrast medium formulations containing 300 and 400 milligrams of iodine per milliliter.
Rist C; Nikolaou K; Kirchin MA; van Gessel R; Bae KT; von Ziegler F; Knez A; Wintersperger BJ; Reiser MF; Becker CR
Invest Radiol; 2006 May; 41(5):460-7. PubMed ID: 16625109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Late reactions to a radiologic contrast media (Iopamidol-Bracco). Prospective study].
Bartolucci F; Cecarini M; Gabrielli G; Abbiati R; Barberio M; Busilacchi P
Radiol Med; 2000 Oct; 100(4):273-8. PubMed ID: 11155455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of a low-osmolar contrast medium, iopamidol, and an iso-osmolar contrast medium, iodixanol, in MDCT coronary angiography.
Ozbulbul NI; Yurdakul M; Tola M
Coron Artery Dis; 2010 Nov; 21(7):414-9. PubMed ID: 20671550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Are there any differences in acute adverse reactions among five low-osmolar non-ionic iodinated contrast media?
Gomi T; Nagamoto M; Hasegawa M; Katoh A; Sugiyama M; Murata N; Kunihiro T; Kohda E
Eur Radiol; 2010 Jul; 20(7):1631-5. PubMed ID: 20033176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
