BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

335 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16163987)

  • 1. Pressure ulcer grading.
    Moore Z
    Nurs Stand; 2005 Sep 7-13; 19(52):56-64; quiz 66. PubMed ID: 16163987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Pressure ulcer grading tools: how reliable are they?
    Sharp A
    J Wound Care; 2004 Feb; 13(2):75-7. PubMed ID: 14999993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Controversies in classifying and assessing grade I pressure ulcers.
    Bethell E
    J Wound Care; 2003 Jan; 12(1):33-6. PubMed ID: 12572234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An interrater reliability study of the assessment of pressure ulcer risk using the Braden scale and the classification of pressure ulcers in a home care setting.
    Kottner J; Halfens R; Dassen T
    Int J Nurs Stud; 2009 Oct; 46(10):1307-12. PubMed ID: 19406400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Pressure ulcer risk assessment in critical care: interrater reliability and validity studies of the Braden and Waterlow scales and subjective ratings in two intensive care units.
    Kottner J; Dassen T
    Int J Nurs Stud; 2010 Jun; 47(6):671-7. PubMed ID: 20003975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Pressure ulcers. Assessment of healing.
    Ferrell BA
    Clin Geriatr Med; 1997 Aug; 13(3):575-86. PubMed ID: 9227946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Examining the validity of pressure ulcer risk assessment scales: a replication study.
    Gould D; Goldstone L; Kelly D; Gammon J
    Int J Nurs Stud; 2004 Mar; 41(3):331-9. PubMed ID: 14967190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assessing and grading pressure ulcers.
    Nurs Stand; 2000 May 3-9; 14(33):2p.. PubMed ID: 11975252
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Pressure ulcer scale for healing: derivation and validation of the PUSH tool. The PUSH Task Force.
    Thomas DR; Rodeheaver GT; Bartolucci AA; Franz RA; Sussman C; Ferrell BA; Cuddigan J; Stotts NA; Maklebust J
    Adv Wound Care; 1997 Sep; 10(5):96-101. PubMed ID: 9362591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An evaluation of the Waterlow pressure ulcer risk-assessment tool.
    Thompson D
    Br J Nurs; 2005 Apr 28-May 11; 14(8):455-9. PubMed ID: 15924028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel's updated pressure ulcer staging system.
    Black J; Baharestani M; Cuddigan J; Dorner B; Edsberg L; Langemo D; Posthauer ME; Ratliff C; Taler G;
    Urol Nurs; 2007 Apr; 27(2):144-50, 156. PubMed ID: 17494455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Existing tools: are they meeting the challenges of pressure ulcer healing?
    Thomas DR
    Adv Wound Care; 1997 Sep; 10(5):86-90. PubMed ID: 9362588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Complications of adapting pressure ulcer risk assessment scales.
    Maylor ME
    Br J Nurs; 2006 Mar 23-Apr 12; 15(6):S26-31. PubMed ID: 16628160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The reliability of two observation methods of nonblanchable erythema, Grade 1 pressure ulcer.
    Vanderwee K; Grypdonck MH; De Bacquer D; Defloor T
    Appl Nurs Res; 2006 Aug; 19(3):156-62. PubMed ID: 16877195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The reliability of the National Database of Nursing Quality Indicators pressure ulcer indicator: a triangulation approach.
    Bergquist-Beringer S; Gajewski B; Dunton N; Klaus S
    J Nurs Care Qual; 2011; 26(4):292-301. PubMed ID: 21407089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Predicting delayed pressure ulcer healing using thermography: a prospective cohort study.
    Nakagami G; Sanada H; Iizaka S; Kadono T; Higashino T; Koyanagi H; Haga N
    J Wound Care; 2010 Nov; 19(11):465-6, 468, 470 passim. PubMed ID: 21135794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Inter-rater reliability and Waterlow's pressure ulcer risk assessment tool.
    Kelly J
    Nurs Stand; 2005 Apr 20-26; 19(32):86-7, 90-2. PubMed ID: 15875591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of pressure ulcer grading scales: a study of clinical utility and inter-rater reliability.
    Pedley GE
    Int J Nurs Stud; 2004 Feb; 41(2):129-40. PubMed ID: 14725777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel's updated pressure ulcer staging system.
    Black J; Baharestani M; Cuddigan J; Dorner B; Edsberg L; Langemo D; Posthauer ME; Ratliff C; Taler G;
    Dermatol Nurs; 2007 Aug; 19(4):343-9; quiz 350. PubMed ID: 17874603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Revision of the PUSH Tool using an expanded database. Pressure Ulcer Scale for Healing.
    Stotts NA; Rodeheaver GT
    Adv Wound Care; 1997 Sep; 10(5):107-10. PubMed ID: 9362593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.