150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16164914)
1. The Gail model predicts breast cancer in women with suspicious radiographic lesions.
Weik JL; Lum SS; Esquivel PA; Tully RJ; Bae WC; Petersen FF; Jaque JM; Reeves ME; Garberoglio CA
Am J Surg; 2005 Oct; 190(4):526-9. PubMed ID: 16164914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of referring physician specialty and practice type on referral for image-guided breast biopsy.
Lazarus E; Mainiero MB; Gareen IF
J Am Coll Radiol; 2005 Jun; 2(6):488-93. PubMed ID: 17411865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Outcome of initially only magnetic resonance mammography-detected findings with and without correlate at second-look sonography: distribution according to patient history of breast cancer and lesion size.
Linda A; Zuiani C; Londero V; Bazzocchi M
Breast; 2008 Feb; 17(1):51-7. PubMed ID: 17709249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The challenge of imaging dense breast parenchyma: is magnetic resonance mammography the technique of choice? A comparative study with x-ray mammography and whole-breast ultrasound.
Pediconi F; Catalano C; Roselli A; Dominelli V; Cagioli S; Karatasiou A; Pronio A; Kirchin MA; Passariello R
Invest Radiol; 2009 Jul; 44(7):412-21. PubMed ID: 19448554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Predicting risk of breast cancer in postmenopausal women by hormone receptor status.
Chlebowski RT; Anderson GL; Lane DS; Aragaki AK; Rohan T; Yasmeen S; Sarto G; Rosenberg CA; Hubbell FA;
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2007 Nov; 99(22):1695-705. PubMed ID: 18000216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Diagnostic value of a breast MRI score for the prediction of malignancy of breast lesions detected solely with MRI].
Siegmann KC; Moron HU; Baur A; Hahn M; Vogel U; Claussen CD; Bitzer M
Rofo; 2009 Jun; 181(6):556-63. PubMed ID: 19452398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Can the radiologist accurately predict the adequacy of sampling when performing ultrasound-guided core biopsy of BI-RADS category 4 and 5 lesions detected on screening mammography?
Doyle JM; O'Doherty A; Coffey L; Pender S; Hill A; Quinn C
Clin Radiol; 2005 Sep; 60(9):999-1005. PubMed ID: 16124982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluating the impact of preoperative breast magnetic resonance imaging on the surgical management of newly diagnosed breast cancers.
Bilimoria KY; Cambic A; Hansen NM; Bethke KP
Arch Surg; 2007 May; 142(5):441-5; discussion 445-7. PubMed ID: 17515485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cancer yield of probably benign breast MR examinations.
Eby PR; Demartini WB; Peacock S; Rosen EL; Lauro B; Lehman CD
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2007 Oct; 26(4):950-5. PubMed ID: 17896380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Characterization of breast lesions with CE-MR multimodal morphological and kinetic analysis: comparison with conventional mammography and high-resolution ultrasound.
Vassiou K; Kanavou T; Vlychou M; Poultsidi A; Athanasiou E; Arvanitis DL; Fezoulidis IV
Eur J Radiol; 2009 Apr; 70(1):69-76. PubMed ID: 18295425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Clinicopathologic features of papillary lesions on core needle biopsy of the breast predictive of malignancy.
Arora N; Hill C; Hoda SA; Rosenblatt R; Pigalarga R; Tousimis EA
Am J Surg; 2007 Oct; 194(4):444-9. PubMed ID: 17826053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Efficiency of Core Biopsy for BI-RADS-5 Breast Lesions.
Wolf R; Quan G; Calhoun K; Soot L; Skokan L
Breast J; 2008; 14(5):471-5. PubMed ID: 18821933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A nomogram to predict for malignant diagnosis of BI-RADS Category 4 breast lesions.
Mazouni C; Sneige N; Rouzier R; Balleyguier C; Bevers T; André F; Vielh P; Delaloge S
J Surg Oncol; 2010 Sep; 102(3):220-4. PubMed ID: 20740578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A decade of breast cancer screening in The Netherlands: trends in the preoperative diagnosis of breast cancer.
Duijm LE; Groenewoud JH; Roumen RM; de Koning HJ; Plaisier ML; Fracheboud J
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2007 Nov; 106(1):113-9. PubMed ID: 17219049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Palpable breast masses with probably benign morphology at sonography: can biopsy be deferred?
Park YM; Kim EK; Lee JH; Ryu JH; Han SS; Choi SJ; Lee SJ; Yoon HK
Acta Radiol; 2008 Dec; 49(10):1104-11. PubMed ID: 18855166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Applicability of the Gail model for breast cancer risk assessment in Turkish female population and evaluation of breastfeeding as a risk factor.
Ulusoy C; Kepenekci I; Kose K; Aydintug S; Cam R
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2010 Apr; 120(2):419-24. PubMed ID: 19760030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. MR imaging-guided 9-gauge vacuum-assisted core-needle breast biopsy: initial experience.
Orel SG; Rosen M; Mies C; Schnall MD
Radiology; 2006 Jan; 238(1):54-61. PubMed ID: 16304093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Palpable masses in breast during lactation.
Obenauer S; Dammert S
Clin Imaging; 2007; 31(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 17189838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Nipple aspirate fluid cytology and the Gail model for breast cancer risk assessment in a screening population.
Tice JA; Miike R; Adduci K; Petrakis NL; King E; Wrensch MR
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2005 Feb; 14(2):324-8. PubMed ID: 15734953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. MR imaging in probably benign lesions (BI-RADS category 3) of the breast.
Gökalp G; Topal U
Eur J Radiol; 2006 Mar; 57(3):436-44. PubMed ID: 16316732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
