193 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16164932)
1. Understanding the mechanisms creating false positive lumpectomy margins.
Dooley WC; Parker J
Am J Surg; 2005 Oct; 190(4):606-8. PubMed ID: 16164932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Intra-operative touch preparation cytology; does it have a role in re-excision lumpectomy?
Valdes EK; Boolbol SK; Cohen JM; Feldman SM
Ann Surg Oncol; 2007 Mar; 14(3):1045-50. PubMed ID: 17206481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Factors associated with residual breast cancer after re-excision for close or positive margins.
Cellini C; Hollenbeck ST; Christos P; Martins D; Carson J; Kemper S; Lavigne E; Chan E; Simmons R
Ann Surg Oncol; 2004 Oct; 11(10):915-20. PubMed ID: 15383425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Defining the clinical target volume for patients with early-stage breast cancer treated with lumpectomy and accelerated partial breast irradiation: a pathologic analysis.
Vicini FA; Kestin LL; Goldstein NS
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2004 Nov; 60(3):722-30. PubMed ID: 15465188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Role for intraoperative margin assessment in patients undergoing breast-conserving surgery.
Cabioglu N; Hunt KK; Sahin AA; Kuerer HM; Babiera GV; Singletary SE; Whitman GJ; Ross MI; Ames FC; Feig BW; Buchholz TA; Meric-Bernstam F
Ann Surg Oncol; 2007 Apr; 14(4):1458-71. PubMed ID: 17260108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of margin status in lumpectomy specimens and residual breast carcinoma.
Scopa CD; Aroukatos P; Tsamandas AC; Aletra C
Breast J; 2006; 12(2):150-3. PubMed ID: 16509840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Relationship between initial margin status for invasive breast cancer and residual carcinoma after re-excision.
Kotwall C; Ranson M; Stiles A; Hamann MS
Am Surg; 2007 Apr; 73(4):337-43. PubMed ID: 17439024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The role of reexcision for positive margins in optimizing local disease control after breast-conserving surgery for cancer.
Aziz D; Rawlinson E; Narod SA; Sun P; Lickley HL; McCready DR; Holloway CM
Breast J; 2006; 12(4):331-7. PubMed ID: 16848842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Influence of breast cancer margin assessment method on the rates of positive margins and residual carcinoma.
Méndez JE; Lamorte WW; de Las Morenas A; Cerda S; Pistey R; King T; Kavanah M; Hirsch E; Stone MD
Am J Surg; 2006 Oct; 192(4):538-40. PubMed ID: 16978970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Do additional shaved margins at the time of lumpectomy eliminate the need for re-excision?
Jacobson AF; Asad J; Boolbol SK; Osborne MP; Boachie-Adjei K; Feldman SM
Am J Surg; 2008 Oct; 196(4):556-8. PubMed ID: 18809063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Lumpectomy margins are affected by tumor size and histologic subtype but not by biopsy technique.
Chagpar AB; Martin RC; Hagendoorn LJ; Chao C; McMasters KM
Am J Surg; 2004 Oct; 188(4):399-402. PubMed ID: 15474434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Re-excision of margins before breast radiation-diagnostic or therapeutic?
Chism DB; Freedman GM; Li T; Anderson PR
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2006 Aug; 65(5):1416-21. PubMed ID: 16730133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The influence of additional surgical margins on the total specimen volume excised and the reoperative rate after breast-conserving surgery.
Huston TL; Pigalarga R; Osborne MP; Tousimis E
Am J Surg; 2006 Oct; 192(4):509-12. PubMed ID: 16978962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Separate cavity margins excision as a complement to conservative breast cancer surgery.
Zavagno G; Donà M; Orvieto E; Mocellin S; Pasquali S; Goldin E; Mele ML; Belardinelli V; Nitti D
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2010 Jul; 36(7):632-8. PubMed ID: 20542659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Factors associated with negative margins of lumpectomy specimen: potential use in selecting patients for intraoperative radiotherapy.
Schiller DE; Le LW; Cho BC; Youngson BJ; McCready DR
Ann Surg Oncol; 2008 Mar; 15(3):833-42. PubMed ID: 18163174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Patient age and positive margins are predictive factors of residual tumor on mastectomy specimen after conservative treatment for breast cancer.
Voguet L; Hébert T; Levêque J; Acker O; Mesbah H; Marret H; Porée P; Body G
Breast; 2009 Aug; 18(4):233-7. PubMed ID: 19628389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. An improved process for breast cancer margin identification and orientation.
Beland M
AORN J; 2009 Oct; 90(4):525-9. PubMed ID: 19801004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Preliminary results and evaluation of MammoSite balloon brachytherapy for partial breast irradiation for pure ductal carcinoma in situ: a phase II clinical study.
Benitez PR; Streeter O; Vicini F; Mehta V; Quiet C; Kuske R; Hayes MK; Arthur D; Kuerer H; Freedman G; Keisch M; Dipetrillo T; Khan D; Hudes R
Am J Surg; 2006 Oct; 192(4):427-33. PubMed ID: 16978943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Association of clinical and pathologic variables with lumpectomy surgical margin status after preoperative diagnosis or excisional biopsy of invasive breast cancer.
Smitt MC; Horst K
Ann Surg Oncol; 2007 Mar; 14(3):1040-4. PubMed ID: 17203329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The value of breast lumpectomy margin assessment as a predictor of residual tumor burden.
Wazer DE; Schmidt-Ullrich RK; Schmid CH; Ruthazer R; Kramer B; Safaii H; Graham R
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1997 May; 38(2):291-9. PubMed ID: 9226315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
