210 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16164938)
1. Pathologic correlates of false positive breast magnetic resonance imaging findings: which lesions warrant biopsy?
Langer SA; Horst KC; Ikeda DM; Daniel BL; Kong CS; Dirbas FM
Am J Surg; 2005 Oct; 190(4):633-40. PubMed ID: 16164938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Frequency of malignancy in lesions classified as probably benign after dynamic contrast-enhanced breast MRI examination.
Sadowski EA; Kelcz F
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2005 May; 21(5):556-64. PubMed ID: 15834907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Categorization of non-mass-like breast lesions detected by MRI.
Sakamoto N; Tozaki M; Higa K; Tsunoda Y; Ogawa T; Abe S; Ozaki S; Sakamoto M; Tsuruhara T; Kawano N; Suzuki T; Yamashiro N; Fukuma E
Breast Cancer; 2008; 15(3):241-6. PubMed ID: 18224381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Magnetic resonance-guided biopsy of suspicious breast lesions with a handheld vacuum biopsy device.
Gebauer B; Bostanjoglo M; Moesta KT; Schneider W; Schlag PM; Felix R
Acta Radiol; 2006 Nov; 47(9):907-13. PubMed ID: 17077039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. MR imaging-guided 9-gauge vacuum-assisted core-needle breast biopsy: initial experience.
Orel SG; Rosen M; Mies C; Schnall MD
Radiology; 2006 Jan; 238(1):54-61. PubMed ID: 16304093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Breast magnetic resonance imaging characteristics in women with occult primary breast carcinoma.
Lieberman S; Sella T; Maly B; Sosna J; Uziely B; Sklair-Levy M
Isr Med Assoc J; 2008 Jun; 10(6):448-52. PubMed ID: 18669145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Benign breast lesions that simulate malignancy: magnetic resonance imaging with radiologic-pathologic correlation.
Iglesias A; Arias M; Santiago P; Rodríguez M; Mañas J; Saborido C
Curr Probl Diagn Radiol; 2007; 36(2):66-82. PubMed ID: 17331838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of suspicious nipple discharge by magnetic resonance mammography based on breast imaging reporting and data system magnetic resonance imaging descriptors.
Tokuda Y; Kuriyama K; Nakamoto A; Choi S; Yutani K; Kunitomi Y; Haneda T; Kawai M; Masuda N; Takeda M; Nakamura H
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2009; 33(1):58-62. PubMed ID: 19188786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. BI-RADS MRI enhancement characteristics of ductal carcinoma in situ.
Rosen EL; Smith-Foley SA; DeMartini WB; Eby PR; Peacock S; Lehman CD
Breast J; 2007; 13(6):545-50. PubMed ID: 17983393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Results of MRI screening for breast cancer in high-risk patients with LCIS and atypical hyperplasia.
Port ER; Park A; Borgen PI; Morris E; Montgomery LL
Ann Surg Oncol; 2007 Mar; 14(3):1051-7. PubMed ID: 17206485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Magnetic resonance imaging of the breast improves detection of invasive cancer, preinvasive cancer, and premalignant lesions during surveillance of women at high risk for breast cancer.
Riedl CC; Ponhold L; Flöry D; Weber M; Kroiss R; Wagner T; Fuchsjäger M; Helbich TH
Clin Cancer Res; 2007 Oct; 13(20):6144-52. PubMed ID: 17947480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Magnetic resonance guided localization and biopsy of suspicious breast lesions.
Fischer U; Kopka L; Grabbe E
Top Magn Reson Imaging; 1998 Feb; 9(1):44-59. PubMed ID: 9617901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Preoperative breast magnetic resonance imaging in early breast cancer: implications for partial breast irradiation.
Tendulkar RD; Chellman-Jeffers M; Rybicki LA; Rim A; Kotwal A; Macklis R; Obi BB
Cancer; 2009 Apr; 115(8):1621-30. PubMed ID: 19224552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Correlation of targeted ultrasound with magnetic resonance imaging abnormalities of the breast.
Beran L; Liang W; Nims T; Paquelet J; Sickle-Santanello B
Am J Surg; 2005 Oct; 190(4):592-4. PubMed ID: 16164928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Effort, accuracy and histology of MR-guided vacuum biopsy of suspicious breast lesions--retrospective evaluation after 389 interventions].
Fischer U; Schwethelm L; Baum FT; Luftner-Nagel S; Teubner J
Rofo; 2009 Aug; 181(8):774-81. PubMed ID: 19582655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The challenge of imaging dense breast parenchyma: is magnetic resonance mammography the technique of choice? A comparative study with x-ray mammography and whole-breast ultrasound.
Pediconi F; Catalano C; Roselli A; Dominelli V; Cagioli S; Karatasiou A; Pronio A; Kirchin MA; Passariello R
Invest Radiol; 2009 Jul; 44(7):412-21. PubMed ID: 19448554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging of breast lesions: first experiences at 3 T.
Lo GG; Ai V; Chan JK; Li KW; Cheung PS; Wong TT; Ma M; Lee R; Chien D
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2009; 33(1):63-9. PubMed ID: 19188787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Palpable breast masses with probably benign morphology at sonography: can biopsy be deferred?
Park YM; Kim EK; Lee JH; Ryu JH; Han SS; Choi SJ; Lee SJ; Yoon HK
Acta Radiol; 2008 Dec; 49(10):1104-11. PubMed ID: 18855166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. MRI-detected suspicious breast lesions: predictive values of kinetic features measured by computer-aided evaluation.
Wang LC; DeMartini WB; Partridge SC; Peacock S; Lehman CD
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 Sep; 193(3):826-31. PubMed ID: 19696298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Value of magnetic resonance imaging in diagnosing breast lesions which need biopsy].
Ling H; Gu YJ; Wang XH; Liu GY; Huang O; Wang LP; Shen KW; Shen ZZ
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2006 Aug; 44(15):1036-9. PubMed ID: 17074240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
