These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16166150)

  • 1. Review of publication bias in studies on publication bias: meta-research on publication bias does not help transfer research results to patient care.
    Kranke P
    BMJ; 2005 Sep; 331(7517):638. PubMed ID: 16166150
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Review of publication bias in studies on publication bias: here's a proposal for editors that may help reduce publication bias.
    Glymour MM; Kawachi I
    BMJ; 2005 Sep; 331(7517):638. PubMed ID: 16166149
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Review of publication bias in studies on publication bias: mandatory publication of data may help.
    Mann J
    BMJ; 2005 Sep; 331(7517):638. PubMed ID: 16166148
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Review of publication bias in studies on publication bias: systematic review is needed.
    Forbes RB; McCarron M
    BMJ; 2005 Sep; 331(7517):638. PubMed ID: 16166147
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Review of publication bias in studies on publication bias: studies on publication bias are probably susceptible to the bias they study.
    Song F
    BMJ; 2005 Sep; 331(7517):637-8. PubMed ID: 16166143
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Systematic review of publication bias in studies on publication bias.
    Dubben HH; Beck-Bornholdt HP
    BMJ; 2005 Aug; 331(7514):433-4. PubMed ID: 15937056
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Multi-authors' self-citation: a further impact factor bias?
    Sala SD; Brooks J
    Cortex; 2008 Oct; 44(9):1139-45. PubMed ID: 18708185
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Publication bias in the pulmonary/allergy literature: effect of pharmaceutical company sponsorship.
    Liss H
    Isr Med Assoc J; 2006 Jul; 8(7):451-4. PubMed ID: 16889157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Meta-analyses with binary outcomes: how many studies need to be omitted to detect a publication bias?
    Saveleva E; Selinski S
    J Toxicol Environ Health A; 2008; 71(13-14):845-50. PubMed ID: 18569583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Publication bias in trials other than RCTs].
    Timmer A
    Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes; 2011; 105(3):194-200. PubMed ID: 21530909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. When the MPU becomes the AMPB.
    Wissow L
    Patient Educ Couns; 2006 Apr; 61(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 16504453
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Picking your peers.
    Goldsmith LA; Blalock EN; Bobkova H; Hall RP
    J Invest Dermatol; 2006 Jul; 126(7):1429-30. PubMed ID: 16778804
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Two years with EBM in Lakartidningen. Clinical research and routine health care closer to each other].
    Werkö L; Asplund K; Aspelin P; Britton M; Eliasson M; af Geijerstam JL; Thelander S
    Lakartidningen; 2002 Sep; 99(36):3478-9, 3482. PubMed ID: 12362745
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Assessment of publication bias in dental specialty journals.
    Polychronopoulou A; Pandis N; Eliades T
    J Evid Based Dent Pract; 2010 Dec; 10(4):207-11. PubMed ID: 21093801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Political borders as scientific barriers in general practice. Portugal and Spain as a case study.
    Villanueva T; Cavadas LF; Gérvas J; Padilla J; Serrano E; Cofiño R
    Eur J Gen Pract; 2010 Sep; 16(3):151-3. PubMed ID: 20653519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Publication bias was not a good reason to discourage trials with low power.
    Borm GF; den Heijer M; Zielhuis GA
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2009 Jan; 62(1):47.e1-10. PubMed ID: 18620841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Estimating the proportion of studies missing for meta-analysis due to publication bias.
    Formann AK
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2008 Sep; 29(5):732-9. PubMed ID: 18586577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Being influential or being misleading? Citation bias in psychiatric research and practice.
    Fiorillo A; Luciano M; Sampogna G
    Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci; 2018 Jun; 27(3):242-243. PubMed ID: 29321076
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The significance of the peer review process against the background of bias: priority ratings of reviewers and editors and the prediction of citation, the role of geographical bias.
    Opthof T; Coronel R; Janse MJ
    Cardiovasc Res; 2002 Dec; 56(3):339-46. PubMed ID: 12445872
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Uptake of methods to deal with publication bias in systematic reviews has increased over time, but there is still much scope for improvement.
    Parekh-Bhurke S; Kwok CS; Pang C; Hooper L; Loke YK; Ryder JJ; Sutton AJ; Hing CB; Harvey I; Song F
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2011 Apr; 64(4):349-57. PubMed ID: 20800992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.