420 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16166360)
1. Assessment of publication bias in meta-analyses of cardiovascular diseases.
Palma S; Delgado-Rodriguez M
J Epidemiol Community Health; 2005 Oct; 59(10):864-9. PubMed ID: 16166360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Publication Bias and Nonreporting Found in Majority of Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses in Anesthesiology Journals.
Hedin RJ; Umberham BA; Detweiler BN; Kollmorgen L; Vassar M
Anesth Analg; 2016 Oct; 123(4):1018-25. PubMed ID: 27537925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Assessment of publication bias required improvement in oral health systematic reviews.
Koletsi D; Valla K; Fleming PS; Chaimani A; Pandis N
J Clin Epidemiol; 2016 Aug; 76():118-24. PubMed ID: 26939926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses on psoriasis: role of funding sources, conflict of interest and bibliometric indices as predictors of methodological quality.
Gómez-García F; Ruano J; Aguilar-Luque M; Gay-Mimbrera J; Maestre-Lopez B; Sanz-Cabanillas JL; Carmona-Fernández PJ; González-Padilla M; Vélez García-Nieto A; Isla-Tejera B
Br J Dermatol; 2017 Jun; 176(6):1633-1644. PubMed ID: 28192600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Methodology and reports of systematic reviews and meta-analyses: a comparison of Cochrane reviews with articles published in paper-based journals.
Jadad AR; Cook DJ; Jones A; Klassen TP; Tugwell P; Moher M; Moher D
JAMA; 1998 Jul; 280(3):278-80. PubMed ID: 9676681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Search for unpublished data by systematic reviewers: an audit.
Ziai H; Zhang R; Chan AW; Persaud N
BMJ Open; 2017 Oct; 7(10):e017737. PubMed ID: 28988181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Publication bias in dermatology systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
Atakpo P; Vassar M
J Dermatol Sci; 2016 May; 82(2):69-74. PubMed ID: 26925817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The appropriateness of asymmetry tests for publication bias in meta-analyses: a large survey.
Ioannidis JP; Trikalinos TA
CMAJ; 2007 Apr; 176(8):1091-6. PubMed ID: 17420491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. How to read and understand and use systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
Leucht S; Kissling W; Davis JM
Acta Psychiatr Scand; 2009 Jun; 119(6):443-50. PubMed ID: 19469725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Systematic review finds that study data not published in full text articles have unclear impact on meta-analyses results in medical research.
Schmucker CM; Blümle A; Schell LK; Schwarzer G; Oeller P; Cabrera L; von Elm E; Briel M; Meerpohl JJ;
PLoS One; 2017; 12(4):e0176210. PubMed ID: 28441452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Searching for unpublished trials in Cochrane reviews may not be worth the effort.
van Driel ML; De Sutter A; De Maeseneer J; Christiaens T
J Clin Epidemiol; 2009 Aug; 62(8):838-844.e3. PubMed ID: 19128939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Publication bias in meta-analyses from the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews.
Kicinski M; Springate DA; Kontopantelis E
Stat Med; 2015 Sep; 34(20):2781-93. PubMed ID: 25988604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Publication bias is underreported in systematic reviews published in high-impact-factor journals: metaepidemiologic study.
Onishi A; Furukawa TA
J Clin Epidemiol; 2014 Dec; 67(12):1320-6. PubMed ID: 25194857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Epidemiology characteristics, reporting characteristics, and methodological quality of systematic reviews and meta-analyses on traditional Chinese medicine nursing interventions published in Chinese journals.
Yang M; Jiang L; Wang A; Xu G
Int J Nurs Pract; 2017 Feb; 23(1):. PubMed ID: 28004476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The quality of reports of critical care meta-analyses in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews: an independent appraisal.
Delaney A; Bagshaw SM; Ferland A; Laupland K; Manns B; Doig C
Crit Care Med; 2007 Feb; 35(2):589-94. PubMed ID: 17205029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Abstract analysis method facilitates filtering low-methodological quality and high-bias risk systematic reviews on psoriasis interventions.
Gómez-García F; Ruano J; Aguilar-Luque M; Alcalde-Mellado P; Gay-Mimbrera J; Hernández-Romero JL; Sanz-Cabanillas JL; Maestre-López B; González-Padilla M; Carmona-Fernández PJ; García-Nieto AV; Isla-Tejera B
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Dec; 17(1):180. PubMed ID: 29284417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Search strategies in systematic reviews in periodontology and implant dentistry.
Faggion CM; Atieh MA; Park S
J Clin Periodontol; 2013 Sep; 40(9):883-8. PubMed ID: 23834263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) statement and publication bias.
Knobloch K; Yoon U; Vogt PM
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2011 Mar; 39(2):91-2. PubMed ID: 21145753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Quality of systematic reviews and meta-analyses published in pediatric surgery.
Salim A; Mullassery D; Losty PD
J Pediatr Surg; 2017 Nov; 52(11):1732-1735. PubMed ID: 28830620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
