228 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16167404)
1. Why current UK legislation on embryo research is immoral. How the argument from lack of qualities and the argument from potentiality have been applied and why they should be rejected.
Deckers J
Bioethics; 2005 Jun; 19(3):251-71. PubMed ID: 16167404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Stem cells, Superman, and the report of the Select Committee.
Brownsword R
Mod Law Rev; 2002 Jul; 65(4):568-87. PubMed ID: 15212071
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Why two arguments from probability fail and one argument from Thomson's analogy of the violinist succeeds in justifying embryo destruction in some situations.
Deckers J
J Med Ethics; 2007 Mar; 33(3):160-4. PubMed ID: 17329388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. House of Lords rejects challenge to therapeutic cloning.
Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority
Hum Reprod Genet Ethics; 2003; 9(2):23. PubMed ID: 14964208
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Principles of ethical decision making regarding embryonic stem cell research in Germany.
Heinemann T; Honnefelder L
Bioethics; 2002 Nov; 16(6):530-43. PubMed ID: 12472113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cloning human embryos for spare tissue: an ethical dilemma.
Bruce D
Hum Reprod Genet Ethics; 2002; 8(2):22-3. PubMed ID: 12731560
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Totipotent and differentiated cells: an ethical difference for therapeutic cloning?
MacKellar C
Biomed Ethics; 2000; 5(3):115-9. PubMed ID: 12755114
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Differentiating between human and non-human interspecies embryos.
MacKellar C
J Med Ethics; 2014 Apr; 40(4):284-5. PubMed ID: 23709176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cell nuclear replacement is regulated by Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act.
Bull Med Ethics; 2003 Mar; (186):13-5. PubMed ID: 14983857
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Beyond the HFE Act of 1990: the regulation of stem cell research in the UK.
Plomer A
Med Law Rev; 2002; 10(2):132-64. PubMed ID: 14982080
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. How to talk about cloning without talking about cloning: public discourse in the UK.
Sexton S
Biomed Ethics; 2000; 5(3):106-14. PubMed ID: 12755112
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. ETHICS, EMBRYOS, AND EVIDENCE: A LOOK BACK AT WARNOCK.
Hammond-Browning N
Med Law Rev; 2015; 23(4):588-619. PubMed ID: 26232721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Embryo research: the significance of the new law.
Samuels A; Barrister JP
Med Sci Law; 1991 Apr; 31(2):115-8. PubMed ID: 2062192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Human embryonic stem cell research: why the discarded-created-distinction cannot be based on the potentiality argument.
Devolder K
Bioethics; 2005 Apr; 19(2):167-86. PubMed ID: 15945151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Stem cell research, in Parliament.
Bull Med Ethics; 2000 Dec-2001 Jan; (164):18-22. PubMed ID: 11831256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Allow cloning in embryo research, says UK report.
Loder N
Nature; 1998 Dec; 396(6711):503. PubMed ID: 9859974
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Expert group to look at UK cloning law.
Masood E
Nature; 1999 Jul; 400(6739):4. PubMed ID: 10403235
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Potentiality and human embryos.
Lizza JP
Bioethics; 2007 Sep; 21(7):379-85. PubMed ID: 17845464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. English lab ready to clone embryos for stem cells.
Hall SS
N Y Times Web; 2004 Oct; ():F2. PubMed ID: 15487064
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The Warnock report.
Warnock M
Br Med J (Clin Res Ed); 1985 Jul; 291(6489):187-90. PubMed ID: 3926117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
