228 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16167404)
21. Do human cells have rights?
Warnock M
Bioethics; 1987 Jan; 1(1):1-14. PubMed ID: 11649757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. The status of the embryo and policy discourse.
Cahill LS
J Med Philos; 1997 Oct; 22(5):407-14. PubMed ID: 9360194
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. The argument from potentiality in the embryo protection debate: finally "depotentialized"?
Stier M; Schoene-Seifert B
Am J Bioeth; 2013; 13(1):19-27. PubMed ID: 23311835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. The legal status of the embryo in comparative perspective.
Eser A
Med Law; 1992; 11(7-8):579-90. PubMed ID: 1302775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Human embryonic cloning.
Bruce D
Hum Reprod Genet Ethics; 2001; 7(1):3-7. PubMed ID: 16639815
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Leftover embryos: 'this is not junk science'.
Kavanaugh JF
America (NY); 2005 Jun 20-27; 192(21):8. PubMed ID: 16175698
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Human reproductive technologies and the law: a select committee report.
House of Commons Science and Technology Committee
Bull Med Ethics; 2005 May; (208):13-21. PubMed ID: 17115496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Ethics and policy in embryonic stem cell research.
Robertson JA
Kennedy Inst Ethics J; 1999 Jun; 9(2):109-36. PubMed ID: 11660628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. The Singapore approach to human stem cell research, therapeutic and reproductive cloning.
Kian CT; Leng TS
Bioethics; 2005 Jun; 19(3):290-303. PubMed ID: 16167408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. R (On the application of Quintavalle) v Secretary of State for Health.
Great Britain. England and Wales. Supreme Court of Judicature, High Court of Justice, Queen's Bench Division, Administrative Court
All Engl Law Rep; 2001; 4():1013-24. PubMed ID: 16998994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Confronting deep moral disagreement: the President's Council on Bioethics, moral status, and human embryos.
Nelson LJ; Meyer MJ
Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(6):33-42. PubMed ID: 16282112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. The bioethics agenda and the Bush second term.
Cohen E
New Atlantis; 2004 Fall-2005 Winter; 7():11-8. PubMed ID: 15812948
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Lords' vote saves supply of research embryos.
New Sci; 1990 Mar; 25(1708):22. PubMed ID: 11655968
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Cloning and government regulation.
Greely H
Hastings Law J; 2002 Jul; 53(5):1085-96. PubMed ID: 15508218
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Cloning technique 'reveals legal loophole'.
Masood E
Nature; 1997 Feb; 385(6619):757. PubMed ID: 9039895
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Embryos, stem cells, morality and public policy: difficult connections.
Momeyer RW
Cap Univ Law Rev; 2003; 31(1):93-104. PubMed ID: 15156894
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. "Other selves": moral and legal proposals regarding the personhood of cryopreserved human embryos.
Brugger EC
Theor Med Bioeth; 2009; 30(2):105-29. PubMed ID: 19253031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. UK consults public on clones for research.
Dickson D
Nature; 1998 Feb; 391(6667):523. PubMed ID: 9468125
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Britain urged to expand embryo studies.
Marshall E
Science; 1998 Dec; 282(5397):2167-8. PubMed ID: 9890819
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Stem cell division: abortion law and its influence on the adoption of radically different embryonic stem cell legislation in the United States, the United Kingdom, and Germany.
Belew KL
Tex Int Law J; 2004; 39(3):479-519. PubMed ID: 16514771
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
