347 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16168509)
21. Long-term (1,243 days), low-temperature (4-15 degrees C), anaerobic biotreatment of acidified wastewaters: bioprocess performance and physiological characteristics.
McKeown RM; Scully C; Mahony T; Collins G; O'Flaherty V
Water Res; 2009 Apr; 43(6):1611-20. PubMed ID: 19217137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Molecular identification and dynamics of microbial communities in reactor treating organic household waste.
Cardinali-Rezende J; Debarry RB; Colturato LF; Carneiro EV; Chartone-Souza E; Nascimento AM
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2009 Sep; 84(4):777-89. PubMed ID: 19551378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Monitoring bacterial and archaeal community shifts in a mesophilic anaerobic batch reactor treating a high-strength organic wastewater.
Lee C; Kim J; Shin SG; Hwang S
FEMS Microbiol Ecol; 2008 Sep; 65(3):544-54. PubMed ID: 18647356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Exploitation of olive mill wastewater and liquid cow manure for biogas production.
Dareioti MA; Dokianakis SN; Stamatelatou K; Zafiri C; Kornaros M
Waste Manag; 2010 Oct; 30(10):1841-8. PubMed ID: 20303252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Characterization of the methanogenic Archaea within two-phase biogas reactor systems operated with plant biomass.
Klocke M; Nettmann E; Bergmann I; Mundt K; Souidi K; Mumme J; Linke B
Syst Appl Microbiol; 2008 Aug; 31(3):190-205. PubMed ID: 18501543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Influence of organic loading on an anaerobic sequencing biofilm batch reactor (ASBBR) as a function of cycle period and wastewater concentration.
Siman RR; Borges AC; Ratusznei SM; Rodrigues JA; Zaiat M; Foresti E; Borzani W
J Environ Manage; 2004 Sep; 72(4):241-7. PubMed ID: 15294356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Mesophilic and thermophilic anaerobic digestion of biologically pretreated abattoir wastewaters in an upflow anaerobic filter.
Gannoun H; Bouallagui H; Okbi A; Sayadi S; Hamdi M
J Hazard Mater; 2009 Oct; 170(1):263-71. PubMed ID: 19501962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Performance comparison of a continuous-flow stirred-tank reactor and an anaerobic sequencing batch reactor for fermentative hydrogen production depending on substrate concentration.
Kim SH; Han SK; Shin HS
Water Sci Technol; 2005; 52(10-11):23-9. PubMed ID: 16459773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Methanogenic pathway and community structure in a thermophilic anaerobic digestion process of organic solid waste.
Sasaki D; Hori T; Haruta S; Ueno Y; Ishii M; Igarashi Y
J Biosci Bioeng; 2011 Jan; 111(1):41-6. PubMed ID: 20851673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Performance of a three-stage membrane bioprocess treating the organic fraction of municipal solid waste and evolution of its archaeal and bacterial ecology.
Trzcinski AP; Ray MJ; Stuckey DC
Bioresour Technol; 2010 Mar; 101(6):1652-61. PubMed ID: 19857960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Enhancement of bioenergy production from organic wastes by two-stage anaerobic hydrogen and methane production process.
Luo G; Xie L; Zhou Q; Angelidaki I
Bioresour Technol; 2011 Sep; 102(18):8700-6. PubMed ID: 21353538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. A continuous-flow approach for the development of an anaerobic consortium capable of an effective biomethanization of a mechanically sorted organic fraction of municipal solid waste as the sole substrate.
Bertin L; Bettini C; Zanaroli G; Frascari D; Fava F
Water Res; 2012 Feb; 46(2):413-24. PubMed ID: 22118905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Psychrophilic and mesophilic anaerobic digestion of brewery effluent: a comparative study.
Connaughton S; Collins G; O'Flaherty V
Water Res; 2006 Jul; 40(13):2503-10. PubMed ID: 16814840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Performance evaluation of a mesophilic (37 degrees C) upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor in treating distiller's grains wastewater.
Gao M; She Z; Jin C
J Hazard Mater; 2007 Mar; 141(3):808-13. PubMed ID: 16949738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Microbial community of a mesophilic propionate-degrading methanogenic consortium in chemostat cultivation analyzed based on 16S rRNA and acetate kinase genes.
Shigematsu T; Era S; Mizuno Y; Ninomiya K; Kamegawa Y; Morimura S; Kida K
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2006 Sep; 72(2):401-15. PubMed ID: 16496142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Effect of dilution rate on the microbial structure of a mesophilic butyrate-degrading methanogenic community during continuous cultivation.
Tang YQ; Shigematsu T; Morimura S; Kida K
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2007 May; 75(2):451-65. PubMed ID: 17221191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Comparison of methanogenic community structure and anaerobic process performance treating swine wastewater between pilot and optimized lab scale bioreactors.
Kim W; Cho K; Lee S; Hwang S
Bioresour Technol; 2013 Oct; 145():48-56. PubMed ID: 23489568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Bacterial community structure and diversity during establishment of an anaerobic bioreactor to treat swine wastewater.
Li P; Wang Y; Wang Y; Liu K; Tong L
Water Sci Technol; 2010; 61(1):243-52. PubMed ID: 20057111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Treatment of fresh leachate with high-strength organics and calcium from municipal solid waste incineration plant using UASB reactor.
Ye J; Mu Y; Cheng X; Sun D
Bioresour Technol; 2011 May; 102(9):5498-503. PubMed ID: 21277197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Experimental and modeling investigations of a hybrid upflow anaerobic sludge-filter bed (UASFB) reactor.
Rajinikanth R; Ramirez I; Steyer JP; Mehrotra I; Kumar P; Escudie R; Torrijos M
Water Sci Technol; 2008; 58(1):109-17. PubMed ID: 18653944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
