295 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16168851)
1. Effectiveness of noncoplanar IMRT planning using a parallelized multiresolution beam angle optimization method for paranasal sinus carcinoma.
Wang X; Zhang X; Dong L; Liu H; Gillin M; Ahamad A; Ang K; Mohan R
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Oct; 63(2):594-601. PubMed ID: 16168851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Development of methods for beam angle optimization for IMRT using an accelerated exhaustive search strategy.
Wang X; Zhang X; Dong L; Liu H; Wu Q; Mohan R
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2004 Nov; 60(4):1325-37. PubMed ID: 15519806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A dosimetric comparison of volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) and non-coplanar intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) for nasal cavity and paranasal sinus cancer.
Jeong Y; Lee SW; Kwak J; Cho I; Yoon SM; Kim JH; Park JH; Choi EK; Song SY; Kim YS; Kim SS; Joo JH; Ahn SD
Radiat Oncol; 2014 Aug; 9():193. PubMed ID: 25175383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Simultaneous beam geometry and intensity map optimization in intensity-modulated radiation therapy.
Lee EK; Fox T; Crocker I
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2006 Jan; 64(1):301-20. PubMed ID: 16289912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. iCycle: Integrated, multicriterial beam angle, and profile optimization for generation of coplanar and noncoplanar IMRT plans.
Breedveld S; Storchi PR; Voet PW; Heijmen BJ
Med Phys; 2012 Feb; 39(2):951-63. PubMed ID: 22320804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of treatment plans using intensity-modulated radiotherapy and three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy for paranasal sinus carcinoma.
Huang D; Xia P; Akazawa P; Akazawa C; Quivey JM; Verhey LJ; Kaplan M; Lee N
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2003 May; 56(1):158-68. PubMed ID: 12694834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of Multiple Treatment Planning Techniques for High-Grade Glioma Tumors Near to Critical Organs.
Bas Ayata H; Ceylan C; Kılıç A; Güden M; Engin K
Oncol Res Treat; 2018; 41(9):514-519. PubMed ID: 30086547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A modular approach to intensity-modulated arc therapy optimization with noncoplanar trajectories.
Papp D; Bortfeld T; Unkelbach J
Phys Med Biol; 2015 Jul; 60(13):5179-98. PubMed ID: 26083759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A derivative-free multistart framework for an automated noncoplanar beam angle optimization in IMRT.
Rocha H; Dias J; Ventura T; Ferreira B; Lopes MD
Med Phys; 2016 Oct; 43(10):5514. PubMed ID: 27782716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of beam angle selection strategies for intracranial IMRT.
Bangert M; Ziegenhein P; Oelfke U
Med Phys; 2013 Jan; 40(1):011716. PubMed ID: 23298086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Benefit of using biologic parameters (EUD and NTCP) in IMRT optimization for treatment of intrahepatic tumors.
Thomas E; Chapet O; Kessler ML; Lawrence TS; Ten Haken RK
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Jun; 62(2):571-8. PubMed ID: 15890602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Role of beam orientation optimization in intensity-modulated radiation therapy.
Pugachev A; Li JG; Boyer AL; Hancock SL; Le QT; Donaldson SS; Xing L
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2001 Jun; 50(2):551-60. PubMed ID: 11380245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Conformal radiation therapy treatment planning reduces the dose to the optic structures for patients with tumors of the paranasal sinuses.
Brizel DM; Light K; Zhou SM; Marks LB
Radiother Oncol; 1999 Jun; 51(3):215-8. PubMed ID: 10435816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Non-coplanar beam direction optimization for intensity-modulated radiotherapy.
Meedt G; Alber M; Nüsslin F
Phys Med Biol; 2003 Sep; 48(18):2999-3019. PubMed ID: 14529207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) for locally advanced paranasal sinus tumors: incorporating clinical decisions in the optimization process.
Tsien C; Eisbruch A; McShan D; Kessler M; Marsh R; Fraass B
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2003 Mar; 55(3):776-84. PubMed ID: 12573765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Lung IMRT planning with automatic determination of beam angle configurations.
Yuan L; Zhu W; Ge Y; Jiang Y; Sheng Y; Yin FF; Wu QJ
Phys Med Biol; 2018 Jul; 63(13):135024. PubMed ID: 29846178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Conformal radiation therapy with fixed shaped coplanar or noncoplanar radiation beam bouquets: a possible alternative to radiosurgery.
Marks LB; Sherouse GW; Das S; Bentel GC; Spencer DP; Turner D
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1995 Dec; 33(5):1209-19. PubMed ID: 7493845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of inverse-planned three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy and intensity-modulated radiotherapy for non-small-cell lung cancer.
Christian JA; Bedford JL; Webb S; Brada M
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2007 Mar; 67(3):735-41. PubMed ID: 17187941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Peripheral doses from noncoplanar IMRT for pediatric radiation therapy.
Kan MW; Leung LH; Kwong DL; Wong W; Lam N
Med Dosim; 2010; 35(4):255-63. PubMed ID: 19962878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Impact of IMRT and leaf width on stereotactic body radiotherapy of liver and lung lesions.
Dvorak P; Georg D; Bogner J; Kroupa B; Dieckmann K; Pötter R
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Apr; 61(5):1572-81. PubMed ID: 15817364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
