These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

83 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16168882)

  • 1. Individualized sampling parameters for behavioral observations: enhancing the predictive validity of competing stimulus assessments.
    DeLeon IG; Toole LM; Gutshall KA; Bowman LG
    Res Dev Disabil; 2005; 26(5):440-55. PubMed ID: 16168882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Competing stimuli in the treatment of multiply controlled problem behavior during hygiene routines.
    Long ES; Hagopian LP; Deleon IG; Marhefka JM; Resau D
    Res Dev Disabil; 2005; 26(1):57-69. PubMed ID: 15590238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluating the predictive validity of a single stimulus engagement preference assessment.
    Hagopian LP; Rush KS; Lewin AB; Long ES
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2001; 34(4):475-85. PubMed ID: 11800186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of a brief multiple-stimulus preference assessment in a naturalistic context.
    Carr JE; Nicolson AC; Higbee TS
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2000; 33(3):353-7. PubMed ID: 11051581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Functional analysis of precursors for serious problem behavior and related intervention.
    Langdon NA; Carr EG; Owen-Deschryver JS
    Behav Modif; 2008 Nov; 32(6):804-27. PubMed ID: 18456900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Functional analysis of separate topographies of aberrant behavior.
    Derby KM; Wacker DP; Peck S; Sasso G; DeRaad A; Berg W; Asmus J; Ulrich S
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1994; 27(2):267-78. PubMed ID: 8063625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reducing pica by teaching children to exchange inedible items for edibles.
    Kern L; Starosta K; Adelman BE
    Behav Modif; 2006 Mar; 30(2):135-58. PubMed ID: 16464843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Context-based assessment and intervention for problem behavior in children with autism spectrum disorder.
    Cale SI; Carr EG; Blakeley-Smith A; Owen-DeSchryver JS
    Behav Modif; 2009 Nov; 33(6):707-42. PubMed ID: 19933441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [The predictive value of DSM-IV criteria in the diagnosis of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder and its cultural differences].
    Cardo E; Bustillo M; Servera M
    Rev Neurol; 2007 Mar; 44 Suppl 2():S19-22. PubMed ID: 17347938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of the predictive validity and consistency among preference assessment procedures: a review of the literature.
    Kang S; O'Reilly M; Lancioni G; Falcomata TS; Sigafoos J; Xu Z
    Res Dev Disabil; 2013 Apr; 34(4):1125-33. PubMed ID: 23357675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Fear of harm, a possible phenotype of pediatric bipolar disorder: a dimensional approach to diagnosis for genotyping psychiatric syndromes.
    Papolos D; Mattis S; Golshan S; Molay F
    J Affect Disord; 2009 Nov; 118(1-3):28-38. PubMed ID: 19631388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Re-evaluation of constant versus varied punishers using empirically derived consequences.
    Toole LM; DeLeon IG; Kahng S; Ruffin GE; Pletcher CA; Bowman LG
    Res Dev Disabil; 2004; 25(6):577-86. PubMed ID: 15541633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A comparison between traditional economical and demand curve analyses of relative reinforcer efficacy in the validation of preference assessment predictions.
    Reed DD; Luiselli JK; Magnuson JD; Fillers S; Vieira S; Rue HC
    Dev Neurorehabil; 2009 Jun; 12(3):164-9. PubMed ID: 19466625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A comparison of verbal and tangible stimulus preference assessments.
    Cohen-Almeida D; Graff RB; Ahearn WH
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2000; 33(3):329-34. PubMed ID: 11051576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of verbal preference assessments in the presence and absence of the actual stimuli.
    Kuhn DE; DeLeon IG; Terlonge C; Goysovich R
    Res Dev Disabil; 2006; 27(6):645-56. PubMed ID: 16263239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Patterns of emotional and behavioural disturbance associated with autistic traits in young people with severe intellectual disabilities and challenging behaviours.
    Hill J; Furniss F
    Res Dev Disabil; 2006; 27(5):517-28. PubMed ID: 16194598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Developmental and behavioral questionnaire for autism spectrum disorders.
    McGrew S; Malow BA; Henderson L; Wang L; Song Y; Stone WL
    Pediatr Neurol; 2007 Aug; 37(2):108-16. PubMed ID: 17675025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Social anxiety and fear of negative evaluation: construct validity of the BFNE-II.
    Carleton RN; Collimore KC; Asmundson GJ
    J Anxiety Disord; 2007; 21(1):131-41. PubMed ID: 16675196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reliability and validity of the Pervasive Developmental Disorders Assessment System.
    Kurita H; Koyama T; Inoue K
    Psychiatry Clin Neurosci; 2008 Apr; 62(2):226-33. PubMed ID: 18412847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A Psychometric evaluation of the German version of the 'Health of the Nation Outcome Scales, HoNOS-D': on the feasibility and reliability of clinician-performed measurements of severity in patients with mental disorders.
    Andreas S; Harfst T; Dirmaier J; Kawski S; Koch U; Schulz H
    Psychopathology; 2007; 40(2):116-25. PubMed ID: 17215598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.