These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16169361)

  • 1. Comparison of the degree of coronary stenoses by multidetector computed tomography versus by quantitative coronary angiography.
    Cury RC; Pomerantsev EV; Ferencik M; Hoffmann U; Nieman K; Moselewski F; Abbara S; Jang IK; Brady TJ; Achenbach S
    Am J Cardiol; 2005 Sep; 96(6):784-7. PubMed ID: 16169361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Accuracy of 16-slice multi-detector CT to quantify the degree of coronary artery stenosis: assessment of cross-sectional and longitudinal vessel reconstructions.
    Cury RC; Ferencik M; Achenbach S; Pomerantsev E; Nieman K; Moselewski F; Abbara S; Jang IK; Brady TJ; Hoffmann U
    Eur J Radiol; 2006 Mar; 57(3):345-50. PubMed ID: 16442256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Quantification of lumen stenoses with known dimensions by conventional angiography and computed tomography: implications of using conventional angiography as gold standard.
    Arbab-Zadeh A; Texter J; Ostbye KM; Kitagawa K; Brinker J; George RT; Miller JM; Trost JC; Lange RA; Lima JA; Lardo AC
    Heart; 2010 Sep; 96(17):1358-63. PubMed ID: 20801854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Diagnostic accuracy in coronary stenosis: comparison between visual score and quantitative analysis (quantitative computed tomographic angiography) in coronary angiography by multidetector computed tomography-coronary angiography and quantitative analysis (quantitative coronary angiography) in conventional coronary angiography.
    Malagò R; D'Onofrio M; Tavella D; Mantovani W; Brunelli S; Pezzato A; Caliari G; Nicolì L; Benussi P; Mucelli RP
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2010; 34(5):652-9. PubMed ID: 20861765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Contrast enhanced multi-detector computed tomography coronary angiography versus conventional invasive quantitative coronary angiography in acute coronary syndrome patients-correlation and bias.
    Dragu R; Rispler S; Ghersin E; Gruberg L; Lessick J; Litmanovich D; Aronson D; Hammerman H; Ofer A; Engel A; Beyar R
    Acute Card Care; 2006; 8(2):99-104. PubMed ID: 16885074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Head-to-head comparison of three-dimensional navigator-gated magnetic resonance imaging and 16-slice computed tomography to detect coronary artery stenosis in patients.
    Kefer J; Coche E; Legros G; Pasquet A; Grandin C; Van Beers BE; Vanoverschelde JL; Gerber BL
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2005 Jul; 46(1):92-100. PubMed ID: 15992641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Invasive versus noninvasive evaluation of coronary artery disease.
    Schuijf JD; van Werkhoven JM; Pundziute G; Jukema JW; Decramer I; Stokkel MP; Dibbets-Schneider P; Schalij MJ; Reiber JH; van der Wall EE; Wijns W; Bax JJ
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2008 Mar; 1(2):190-9. PubMed ID: 19356428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Diagnostic accuracy of multidetector computed tomography coronary angiography in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy.
    Andreini D; Pontone G; Pepi M; Ballerini G; Bartorelli AL; Magini A; Quaglia C; Nobili E; Agostoni P
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2007 May; 49(20):2044-50. PubMed ID: 17512361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Predictive value of noninvasive coronary angiography with multidetector computed tomography to detect significant coronary stenosis before valve surgery.
    Reant P; Brunot S; Lafitte S; Serri K; Leroux L; Corneloup O; Iriart X; Coste P; Dos Santos P; Roudaut R; Laurent F
    Am J Cardiol; 2006 May; 97(10):1506-10. PubMed ID: 16679094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography compared with coronary angiography].
    Valgeirsdóttir IR; Haraldsdóttir S; Scheving SS; Gudjónsdóttir J; Sigurdsson AF; Gudnason T; Eyjólfsson K; Jónsdóttir B; Andersen K
    Laeknabladid; 2008 Mar; 94(3):199-205. PubMed ID: 18310782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assessment of coronary stenosis, plaque burden and remodeling by multidetector computed tomography in patients referred for suspected coronary artery disease.
    Pedrazzini GB; D'angeli I; Vassalli G; Faletra FF; Klersy C; Pasotti E; Corbacelli C; Moccetti T; Auricchio A
    J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown); 2011 Feb; 12(2):122-30. PubMed ID: 21045721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Coronary artery stenosis quantification using multislice computed tomography.
    Dewey M; Rutsch W; Schnapauff D; Teige F; Hamm B
    Invest Radiol; 2007 Feb; 42(2):78-84. PubMed ID: 17220725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Accuracy of 16-row multidetector computed tomography for the assessment of coronary artery stenosis.
    Garcia MJ; Lessick J; Hoffmann MH;
    JAMA; 2006 Jul; 296(4):403-11. PubMed ID: 16868298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Visual and automatic grading of coronary artery stenoses with 64-slice CT angiography in reference to invasive angiography.
    Busch S; Johnson TR; Nikolaou K; von Ziegler F; Knez A; Reiser MF; Becker CR
    Eur Radiol; 2007 Jun; 17(6):1445-51. PubMed ID: 17180326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of coronary atheroma by 64-slice multidetector computed tomography: Comparison with intravascular ultrasound and angiography.
    Ugolini P; Pressacco J; Lespérance J; Berry C; L'Allier PL; Ibrahim R; Grégoire J; Ouellet R; Heinonen T; Levesque S; Guertin MC; Tardif JC
    Can J Cardiol; 2009 Nov; 25(11):641-7. PubMed ID: 19898696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of sixty-four-slice multidetector computed tomographic coronary angiography to coronary angiography with intravascular ultrasound for the detection of transplant vasculopathy.
    Gregory SA; Ferencik M; Achenbach S; Yeh RW; Hoffmann U; Inglessis I; Cury RC; Nieman K; McNulty IA; Laffan JA; Pomerantsev EV; Brady TJ; Semigran MJ; Jang IK
    Am J Cardiol; 2006 Oct; 98(7):877-84. PubMed ID: 16996866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Direct comparison of whole-heart navigator-gated magnetic resonance coronary angiography and 40- and 64-slice multidetector row computed tomography to detect the coronary artery stenosis in patients scheduled for conventional coronary angiography.
    Pouleur AC; le Polain de Waroux JB; Kefer J; Pasquet A; Vanoverschelde JL; Gerber BL
    Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2008 Sep; 1(2):114-21. PubMed ID: 19808528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Impact of vessel attenuation on quantitative coronary angiography with 64-slice CT.
    Husmann L; Gaemperli O; Valenta I; Schepis T; Scheffel H; Stolzmann P; Leschka S; Desbiolles L; Marincek B; Alkadhi H; Kaufmann PA
    Br J Radiol; 2009 Aug; 82(980):649-53. PubMed ID: 19221184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) patency: assessment with high-resolution submillimeter 16-slice multidetector-row computed tomography (MDCT) versus coronary angiography.
    Anders K; Baum U; Schmid M; Ropers D; Schmid A; Pohle K; Daniel WG; Bautz W; Achenbach S
    Eur J Radiol; 2006 Mar; 57(3):336-44. PubMed ID: 16446072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Accurate quantification of pulmonary artery diameter in patients with cyanotic congenital heart disease using multidetector-row computed tomography.
    Hayabuchi Y; Mori K; Kitagawa T; Inoue M; Kagami S
    Am Heart J; 2007 Oct; 154(4):783-8. PubMed ID: 17893009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.