514 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16169487)
1. Recombination enhances protein adaptation in Drosophila melanogaster.
Presgraves DC
Curr Biol; 2005 Sep; 15(18):1651-6. PubMed ID: 16169487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Adaptation shapes patterns of genome evolution on sexual and asexual chromosomes in Drosophila.
Bachtrog D
Nat Genet; 2003 Jun; 34(2):215-9. PubMed ID: 12754509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Reduced effectiveness of selection caused by a lack of recombination.
Betancourt AJ; Welch JJ; Charlesworth B
Curr Biol; 2009 Apr; 19(8):655-60. PubMed ID: 19285399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Intragenic Hill-Robertson interference influences selection intensity on synonymous mutations in Drosophila.
Comeron JM; Guthrie TB
Mol Biol Evol; 2005 Dec; 22(12):2519-30. PubMed ID: 16120803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evidence that positive selection drives Y-chromosome degeneration in Drosophila miranda.
Bachtrog D
Nat Genet; 2004 May; 36(5):518-22. PubMed ID: 15107853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Direct estimation of per nucleotide and genomic deleterious mutation rates in Drosophila.
Haag-Liautard C; Dorris M; Maside X; Macaskill S; Halligan DL; Houle D; Charlesworth B; Keightley PD
Nature; 2007 Jan; 445(7123):82-5. PubMed ID: 17203060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Local effects of limited recombination: historical perspective and consequences for population estimates of adaptive evolution.
Williford A; Comeron JM
J Hered; 2010; 101 Suppl 1():S127-34. PubMed ID: 20421321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Mutation pressure, natural selection, and the evolution of base composition in Drosophila.
Akashi H; Kliman RM; Eyre-Walker A
Genetica; 1998; 102-103(1-6):49-60. PubMed ID: 9720271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Sexual recombination and the power of natural selection.
Rice WR; Chippindale AK
Science; 2001 Oct; 294(5542):555-9. PubMed ID: 11641490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Differences in the pattern of evolution in six physically linked genes of Drosophila melanogaster.
Zurovcová M; Tatarenkov A; Berec L
Gene; 2006 Oct; 381():24-33. PubMed ID: 16914271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Genetic recombination and adaptation to fluctuating environments: selection for geotaxis in Drosophila melanogaster.
Bourguet D; Gair J; Mattice M; Whitlock MC
Heredity (Edinb); 2003 Jul; 91(1):78-84. PubMed ID: 12815456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Chromosomal effects of rapid gene evolution in Drosophila melanogaster.
Nurminsky D; Aguiar DD; Bustamante CD; Hartl DL
Science; 2001 Jan; 291(5501):128-30. PubMed ID: 11141564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Mating-induced recombination in fruit flies.
Priest NK; Roach DA; Galloway LF
Evolution; 2007 Jan; 61(1):160-7. PubMed ID: 17300435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Why sex and recombination?
Barton NH
Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol; 2009; 74():187-95. PubMed ID: 19903748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Sexual selection and maintenance of sex: evidence from comparisons of rates of genomic accumulation of mutations and divergence of sex-related genes in sexual and hermaphroditic species of Caenorhabditis.
Artieri CG; Haerty W; Gupta BP; Singh RS
Mol Biol Evol; 2008 May; 25(5):972-9. PubMed ID: 18281268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Genetic recombination and molecular evolution.
Charlesworth B; Betancourt AJ; Kaiser VB; Gordo I
Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol; 2009; 74():177-86. PubMed ID: 19734202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Rapid evolution of outer egg membrane proteins in the Drosophila melanogaster subgroup: a case of ecologically driven evolution of female reproductive traits.
Jagadeeshan S; Singh RS
Mol Biol Evol; 2007 Apr; 24(4):929-38. PubMed ID: 17244601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Interference among deleterious mutations favours sex and recombination in finite populations.
Keightley PD; Otto SP
Nature; 2006 Sep; 443(7107):89-92. PubMed ID: 16957730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Sexual reproduction selects for robustness and negative epistasis in artificial gene networks.
Azevedo RB; Lohaus R; Srinivasan S; Dang KK; Burch CL
Nature; 2006 Mar; 440(7080):87-90. PubMed ID: 16511495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evolutionary traction: the cost of adaptation and the evolution of sex.
Hadany L; Feldman MW
J Evol Biol; 2005 Mar; 18(2):309-14. PubMed ID: 15715837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
