114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16169654)
1. Influence of enamel wetness on resin composite restorations using various dentine bonding agents: part I-effects on marginal quality and enamel microcrack formation.
Chuang SF; Chang CH; Yaman P; Chang LT
J Dent; 2006 May; 34(5):343-51. PubMed ID: 16169654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Influence of enamel wetness on composite restorations using various dentine bonding agents: part II-effects on shear bond strength.
Chuang SF; Chang LT; Chang CH; Yaman P; Liu JK
J Dent; 2006 May; 34(5):352-61. PubMed ID: 16171924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Influence of incorrect application of a water-based adhesive system on the marginal adaptation of Class V restorations.
Peschke A; Blunck U; Roulet JF
Am J Dent; 2000 Oct; 13(5):239-44. PubMed ID: 11764109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Marginal adaptation and microtensile bond strength of composite indirect restorations bonded to dentin treated with adhesive and low-viscosity composite.
de Andrade OS; de Goes MF; Montes MA
Dent Mater; 2007 Mar; 23(3):279-87. PubMed ID: 16546249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Influence of solvent type in experimental dentin primer on the marginal adaptation of Class V restorations.
Balkenhol M; Huang J; Wöstmann B; Hannig M
J Dent; 2007 Nov; 35(11):836-44. PubMed ID: 17905507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The effect of collagen removal and the use of a low-viscosity resin liner on marginal adaptation of resin composite restorations with margins in dentin.
Montes MA; de Goes MF; Ambrosano GM; Duarte RM; Sobrinho LC
Oper Dent; 2003; 28(4):378-87. PubMed ID: 12877423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. SEM analysis of marginal expansion and gap formation in Class II composite restorations.
Thonemann BM; Federlin M; Schmalz G; Hiller KA
Dent Mater; 1997 May; 13(3):192-7. PubMed ID: 9758974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Microtensile bond strengths to cavity floor dentin in indirect composite restorations using resin coating.
Okuda M; Nikaido T; Maruoka R; Foxton RM; Tagami J
J Esthet Restor Dent; 2007; 19(1):38-46; discussion 47-8. PubMed ID: 17244149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Microtensile bond strengths and scanning electron microscopic evaluation of self-adhesive and self-etch resin cements to intact and etched enamel.
Duarte S; Botta AC; Meire M; Sadan A
J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Sep; 100(3):203-10. PubMed ID: 18762032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of shear bond strength and interfacial micromorphology of direct restorations in primary and permanent teeth--an in vitro study.
da Costa CC; Oshima HM; Costa Filho LC
Gen Dent; 2008; 56(1):85-93; quiz 94-5, 111-2. PubMed ID: 18254567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The effect of different adhesive types and curing methods on microleakage and the marginal adaptation of composite veneers.
Maleknejad F; Moosavi H; Shahriari R; Sarabi N; Shayankhah T
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2009 May; 10(3):18-26. PubMed ID: 19430622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of resin composite materials. Part II: in vivo investigations.
Krämer N; García-Godoy F; Frankenberger R
Am J Dent; 2005 Apr; 18(2):75-81. PubMed ID: 15973822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The shear bond strength of acetone and ethanol-based bonding agents to bleached teeth.
Montalvan E; Vaidyanathan TK; Shey Z; Janal MN; Caceda JH
Pediatr Dent; 2006; 28(6):531-6. PubMed ID: 17249435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Marginal adaptation of a new compomer under different conditioning methods.
Luo Y; Tay FR; Lo EC; Wei SH
J Dent; 2000 Sep; 28(7):495-500. PubMed ID: 10960753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of activation mode of dual-cured resin cements and low-viscosity composite liners on bond strength to dentin.
Garcia RN; Reis AF; Giannini M
J Dent; 2007 Jul; 35(7):564-9. PubMed ID: 17467865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Self-etching bonding systems: in-vitro micro-leakage evaluation.
Brandt PD; de Wet FA; du Preez IC
SADJ; 2006 Jul; 61(6):248, 250-1. PubMed ID: 16977953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of adhesive systems and bevel on enamel margin integrity in primary and permanent teeth.
Swanson TK; Feigal RJ; Tantbirojn D; Hodges JS
Pediatr Dent; 2008; 30(2):134-40. PubMed ID: 18481578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Clinical performance of a self-etching adhesive at 18 months.
Perdigão J; Carmo AR; Anauate-Netto C; Amore R; Lewgoy HR; Cordeiro HJ; Dutra-Corrêa M; Castilhos N
Am J Dent; 2005 Apr; 18(2):135-40. PubMed ID: 15973834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Microleakage of ceramic inlays luted with different resin cements and dentin adhesives.
Uludag B; Ozturk O; Ozturk AN
J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Oct; 102(4):235-41. PubMed ID: 19782826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effect of different adhesive systems and laser treatment on the shear bond strength of bleached enamel.
Gurgan S; Alpaslan T; Kiremitci A; Cakir FY; Yazici E; Gorucu J
J Dent; 2009 Jul; 37(7):527-34. PubMed ID: 19403230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
