These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16169654)

  • 1. Influence of enamel wetness on resin composite restorations using various dentine bonding agents: part I-effects on marginal quality and enamel microcrack formation.
    Chuang SF; Chang CH; Yaman P; Chang LT
    J Dent; 2006 May; 34(5):343-51. PubMed ID: 16169654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Influence of enamel wetness on composite restorations using various dentine bonding agents: part II-effects on shear bond strength.
    Chuang SF; Chang LT; Chang CH; Yaman P; Liu JK
    J Dent; 2006 May; 34(5):352-61. PubMed ID: 16171924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Influence of incorrect application of a water-based adhesive system on the marginal adaptation of Class V restorations.
    Peschke A; Blunck U; Roulet JF
    Am J Dent; 2000 Oct; 13(5):239-44. PubMed ID: 11764109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Marginal adaptation and microtensile bond strength of composite indirect restorations bonded to dentin treated with adhesive and low-viscosity composite.
    de Andrade OS; de Goes MF; Montes MA
    Dent Mater; 2007 Mar; 23(3):279-87. PubMed ID: 16546249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Influence of solvent type in experimental dentin primer on the marginal adaptation of Class V restorations.
    Balkenhol M; Huang J; Wöstmann B; Hannig M
    J Dent; 2007 Nov; 35(11):836-44. PubMed ID: 17905507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effect of collagen removal and the use of a low-viscosity resin liner on marginal adaptation of resin composite restorations with margins in dentin.
    Montes MA; de Goes MF; Ambrosano GM; Duarte RM; Sobrinho LC
    Oper Dent; 2003; 28(4):378-87. PubMed ID: 12877423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. SEM analysis of marginal expansion and gap formation in Class II composite restorations.
    Thonemann BM; Federlin M; Schmalz G; Hiller KA
    Dent Mater; 1997 May; 13(3):192-7. PubMed ID: 9758974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Microtensile bond strengths to cavity floor dentin in indirect composite restorations using resin coating.
    Okuda M; Nikaido T; Maruoka R; Foxton RM; Tagami J
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2007; 19(1):38-46; discussion 47-8. PubMed ID: 17244149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Microtensile bond strengths and scanning electron microscopic evaluation of self-adhesive and self-etch resin cements to intact and etched enamel.
    Duarte S; Botta AC; Meire M; Sadan A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Sep; 100(3):203-10. PubMed ID: 18762032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of shear bond strength and interfacial micromorphology of direct restorations in primary and permanent teeth--an in vitro study.
    da Costa CC; Oshima HM; Costa Filho LC
    Gen Dent; 2008; 56(1):85-93; quiz 94-5, 111-2. PubMed ID: 18254567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effect of different adhesive types and curing methods on microleakage and the marginal adaptation of composite veneers.
    Maleknejad F; Moosavi H; Shahriari R; Sarabi N; Shayankhah T
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2009 May; 10(3):18-26. PubMed ID: 19430622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of resin composite materials. Part II: in vivo investigations.
    Krämer N; García-Godoy F; Frankenberger R
    Am J Dent; 2005 Apr; 18(2):75-81. PubMed ID: 15973822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The shear bond strength of acetone and ethanol-based bonding agents to bleached teeth.
    Montalvan E; Vaidyanathan TK; Shey Z; Janal MN; Caceda JH
    Pediatr Dent; 2006; 28(6):531-6. PubMed ID: 17249435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Marginal adaptation of a new compomer under different conditioning methods.
    Luo Y; Tay FR; Lo EC; Wei SH
    J Dent; 2000 Sep; 28(7):495-500. PubMed ID: 10960753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of activation mode of dual-cured resin cements and low-viscosity composite liners on bond strength to dentin.
    Garcia RN; Reis AF; Giannini M
    J Dent; 2007 Jul; 35(7):564-9. PubMed ID: 17467865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Self-etching bonding systems: in-vitro micro-leakage evaluation.
    Brandt PD; de Wet FA; du Preez IC
    SADJ; 2006 Jul; 61(6):248, 250-1. PubMed ID: 16977953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of adhesive systems and bevel on enamel margin integrity in primary and permanent teeth.
    Swanson TK; Feigal RJ; Tantbirojn D; Hodges JS
    Pediatr Dent; 2008; 30(2):134-40. PubMed ID: 18481578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Clinical performance of a self-etching adhesive at 18 months.
    Perdigão J; Carmo AR; Anauate-Netto C; Amore R; Lewgoy HR; Cordeiro HJ; Dutra-Corrêa M; Castilhos N
    Am J Dent; 2005 Apr; 18(2):135-40. PubMed ID: 15973834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Microleakage of ceramic inlays luted with different resin cements and dentin adhesives.
    Uludag B; Ozturk O; Ozturk AN
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Oct; 102(4):235-41. PubMed ID: 19782826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of different adhesive systems and laser treatment on the shear bond strength of bleached enamel.
    Gurgan S; Alpaslan T; Kiremitci A; Cakir FY; Yazici E; Gorucu J
    J Dent; 2009 Jul; 37(7):527-34. PubMed ID: 19403230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.