These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16170949)

  • 21. Measurement of auditory cues in drivers' distraction.
    Lin CY; Hsu CC
    Percept Mot Skills; 2010 Oct; 111(2):503-16. PubMed ID: 21162452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The effect of stimulus modality on signal detection: implications for assessing the safety of in-vehicle technology.
    Merat N; Jamson AH
    Hum Factors; 2008 Feb; 50(1):145-58. PubMed ID: 18354978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Distraction from multiple in-vehicle secondary tasks: vehicle performance and mental workload implications.
    Lansdown TC; Brook-Carter N; Kersloot T
    Ergonomics; 2004 Jan; 47(1):91-104. PubMed ID: 14660220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The role of looming and attention capture in drivers' braking responses.
    Terry HR; Charlton SG; Perrone JA
    Accid Anal Prev; 2008 Jul; 40(4):1375-82. PubMed ID: 18606269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. On-Road Evaluation of In-vehicle Interface Characteristics and Their Effects on Performance of Visual Detection on the Road and Manual Entry.
    Suh Y; Ferris TK
    Hum Factors; 2019 Feb; 61(1):105-118. PubMed ID: 30059239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Driving while using a smartphone-based mobility application: Evaluating the impact of three multi-choice user interfaces on visual-manual distraction.
    Louveton N; McCall R; Koenig V; Avanesov T; Engel T
    Appl Ergon; 2016 May; 54():196-204. PubMed ID: 26851479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Comparison of manual vs. speech-based interaction with in-vehicle information systems.
    Maciej J; Vollrath M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2009 Sep; 41(5):924-30. PubMed ID: 19664428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The distraction effects of phone use during a crucial driving maneuver.
    Hancock PA; Lesch M; Simmons L
    Accid Anal Prev; 2003 Jul; 35(4):501-14. PubMed ID: 12729814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Alpha spindles as neurophysiological correlates indicating attentional shift in a simulated driving task.
    Sonnleitner A; Simon M; Kincses WE; Buchner A; Schrauf M
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2012 Jan; 83(1):110-8. PubMed ID: 22094045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Dissociation between driving performance and drivers' subjective estimates of performance and workload in dual-task conditions.
    Horrey WJ; Lesch MF; Garabet A
    J Safety Res; 2009; 40(1):7-12. PubMed ID: 19285580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Driving performance changes of middle-aged experienced taxi drivers due to distraction tasks during unexpected situations.
    Kim HS; Choi MH; Choi JS; Kim HJ; Hong SP; Jun JH; Tack GR; Kim B; Min UC; Lim DW; Chung SC
    Percept Mot Skills; 2013 Oct; 117(2):411-26. PubMed ID: 24611246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The Attentional Demand of Automobile Driving Revisited: Occlusion Distance as a Function of Task-Relevant Event Density in Realistic Driving Scenarios.
    Kujala T; Mäkelä J; Kotilainen I; Tokkonen T
    Hum Factors; 2016 Feb; 58(1):163-80. PubMed ID: 26238120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Identification of real-time diagnostic measures of visual distraction with an automatic eye-tracking system.
    Zhang H; Smith MR; Witt GJ
    Hum Factors; 2006; 48(4):805-21. PubMed ID: 17240726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Task interruptability and duration as measures of visual distraction.
    Noy YI; Lemoine TL; Klachan C; Burns PC
    Appl Ergon; 2004 May; 35(3):207-13. PubMed ID: 15145283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. An on-road assessment of cognitive distraction: impacts on drivers' visual behavior and braking performance.
    Harbluk JL; Noy YI; Trbovich PL; Eizenman M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2007 Mar; 39(2):372-9. PubMed ID: 17054894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The critical tracking task: a potentially useful method to assess driver distraction?
    Petzoldt T; Bellem H; Krems JF
    Hum Factors; 2014 Jun; 56(4):789-808. PubMed ID: 25029903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Fluctuating attentional demand in a simulated driving assessment: the roles of age and driving complexity.
    Stinchcombe A; Gagnon S; Zhang JJ; Montembeault P; Bedard M
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2011 Dec; 12(6):576-87. PubMed ID: 22133333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Driver Compensation: Impairment or Improvement?
    Young RA
    Hum Factors; 2015 Dec; 57(8):1334-8. PubMed ID: 26534851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Evaluation of in-vehicle HMI using occlusion techniques: experimental results and practical implications.
    Baumann M; Keinath A; Krems JF; Bengler K
    Appl Ergon; 2004 May; 35(3):197-205. PubMed ID: 15145282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A meta-analysis of in-vehicle and nomadic voice-recognition system interaction and driving performance.
    Simmons SM; Caird JK; Steel P
    Accid Anal Prev; 2017 Sep; 106():31-43. PubMed ID: 28554063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.