427 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16171490)
41. The capacity of hysterosalpingography and laparoscopy to predict natural conception.
Verhoeve HR; Coppus SF; van der Steeg JW; Steures P; Hompes PG; Bourdrez P; Bossuyt PM; van der Veen F; Mol BW;
Hum Reprod; 2011 Jan; 26(1):134-42. PubMed ID: 21088018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Assessment of tubal factor contribution to female infertility in a low resource setting (southwest Nigeria): hysterosalpingography vs laparoscopy.
Okunlola MA; Adebayo OJ; Odukogbe AA; Morhason-Bello IO; Owonikoko KM
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2005 Nov; 25(8):803-4. PubMed ID: 16368589
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
43. Re-evaluation of the indication for and limitation of laparoscopic salpingotomy for tubal pregnancy.
Fujishita A; Khan KN; Kitajima M; Hiraki K; Miura S; Ishimaru T; Masuzaki H
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2008 Apr; 137(2):210-6. PubMed ID: 17459564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. [A comparative study between hysterosalpingography and laparoscopy in evaluating female infertility].
Tsankova M; Nalbanski B; Borisov I; Borisov S
Akush Ginekol (Sofiia); 2000; 39(1):20-2. PubMed ID: 10826330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Surgical management of tubal factor infertility.
James C; Gomel V
Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 1990 Apr; 2(2):200-6. PubMed ID: 2102317
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
46. Inguinal herniorrhaphy in childhood may result in tubal damage and future infertility.
Cam C; Celik C; Sancak A; Iskender C; Karateke A
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2009 Feb; 279(2):175-6. PubMed ID: 18437405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Chlamydia trachomatis antibody titers and hysterosalpingography in predicting tubal disease in infertility patients.
Meikle SF; Zhang X; Marine WM; Calonge BN; Hamman RF; Betz G
Fertil Steril; 1994 Aug; 62(2):305-12. PubMed ID: 8034077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Diagnosis and treatment of tubal diverticula: report of 13 cases.
Han H; Guan J; Wang Y; Zhang Q; Shen H
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2014; 21(1):142-6. PubMed ID: 23850900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Comparison of hysterosalpingography and laparoscopy in the evaluation of infertile women.
Sakar MN; Gul T; Atay AE; Celik Y
Saudi Med J; 2008 Sep; 29(9):1315-8. PubMed ID: 18813419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Tubal factor infertility: diagnosis and management in the era of assisted reproductive technology.
Dun EC; Nezhat CH
Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am; 2012 Dec; 39(4):551-66. PubMed ID: 23182560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Comparison of three-dimensional hysterosalpingo-contrast-sonography and diagnostic laparoscopy with chromopertubation in the assessment of tubal patency for the investigation of subfertility.
Chan CC; Ng EH; Tang OS; Chan KK; Ho PC
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2005 Sep; 84(9):909-13. PubMed ID: 16097985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. [Interest of laparoscopy in infertile couple with normal hysterosalpingography].
Fatnassi R; Kaabia O; Laadhari S; Briki R; Dimassi Z; Bibi M; Hidar S; Ben Regaya L; Khairi H
Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2014 Jan; 42(1):20-6. PubMed ID: 23462340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. [Uterine abnormality and fallopian tube damage--surgical correction in one session?].
Römer T; Lober R; Göretzlehner G; Bojahr B
Zentralbl Gynakol; 1992; 114(10):486-90. PubMed ID: 1414064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Prognostic capacity of transvaginal hydrolaparoscopy to predict spontaneous pregnancy.
van Tetering EA; Bongers MY; Wiegerinck MA; Mol BW; Koks CA
Hum Reprod; 2007 Apr; 22(4):1091-4. PubMed ID: 17234678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. [The prognostic value of pre- and postoperative adhesion score and chromopertubation score in sterility operations on the fallopian tubes. 1. Comparison of pre- and postoperative laparoscopic findings].
Lober R; Römer T; Göretzlehner G; Nikschick S
Zentralbl Gynakol; 1991; 113(6):309-15. PubMed ID: 1829308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. [Correlation between endometriosis and fallopian tube patency in sterility patients especially after microsurgical sterility operations].
Schmeisser JO; Krause T; Lober R; Köhler G
Zentralbl Gynakol; 1996; 118(7):397-400. PubMed ID: 8766100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Up-to-date surgical management of tubal infertility due to inflammations of the pelvis.
Godó G; Koloszár S; Sas M
Acta Chir Hung; 1988; 29(2):197-204. PubMed ID: 2972147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Accuracy of hysterosalpingography and laparoscopic hydrotubation in diagnosis of tubal patency.
Adelusi B; al-Nuaim L; Makanjuola D; Khashoggi T; Chowdhury N; Kangave D
Fertil Steril; 1995 May; 63(5):1016-20. PubMed ID: 7720910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Performing the Parryscope technique gently for office tubal patency assessment.
Parry JP; Riche D; Rushing J; Linton B; Butler V; Lindheim SR
Fertil Steril; 2017 Oct; 108(4):718. PubMed ID: 28843382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Is hysterosalpingography an important tool in modern gynecological practice?
Dhaliwal LK; Gupta KR; Aggarwal N
Int J Fertil Womens Med; 1999; 44(4):212-5. PubMed ID: 10499744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
