These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

270 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16172595)

  • 1. [Neonatal hearing screening during the first and second day of life].
    Del Buono ZG; Mininni F; Delvecchio M; Pannacciulli C; Mininni S
    Minerva Pediatr; 2005 Aug; 57(4):167-72. PubMed ID: 16172595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Newborn hearing screening by transient evoked otoacoustic emissions: analysis of response as a function of risk factors.
    De Capua B; De Felice C; Costantini D; Bagnoli F; Passali D
    Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital; 2003 Feb; 23(1):16-20. PubMed ID: 12812130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Hearing assessment in infants and children: recommendations beyond neonatal screening.
    Harlor AD; Bower C; ;
    Pediatrics; 2009 Oct; 124(4):1252-63. PubMed ID: 19786460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [A combined neonatal hearing screening protocol].
    Almenar Latorre A; Tapia Toca MC; Fernández Pérez C; Moro Serrano M
    An Esp Pediatr; 2002 Jul; 57(1):55-9. PubMed ID: 12139894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Newborn hearing screening programme outcomes in a research hospital from Turkey.
    Tasci Y; Muderris II; Erkaya S; Altinbas S; Yucel H; Haberal A
    Child Care Health Dev; 2010 May; 36(3):317-22. PubMed ID: 20015280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The results of newborn hearing screening by means of transient evoked otoacoustic emissions.
    Wroblewska-Seniuk K; Chojnacka K; Pucher B; Szczapa J; Gadzinowski J; Grzegorowski M
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2005 Oct; 69(10):1351-7. PubMed ID: 15904979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of currently available devices designed for newborn hearing screening using automated auditory brainstem and/or otoacoustic emission measurements.
    Meier S; Narabayashi O; Probst R; Schmuziger N
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2004 Jul; 68(7):927-34. PubMed ID: 15183584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Universal neonatal hearing screening: the Siena (Italy) experience on 19,700 newborns.
    De Capua B; Costantini D; Martufi C; Latini G; Gentile M; De Felice C
    Early Hum Dev; 2007 Sep; 83(9):601-6. PubMed ID: 17307313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Changes in transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions in the first month of life.
    Prieve BA; Hancur-Bucci CA; Preston JL
    Ear Hear; 2009 Jun; 30(3):330-9. PubMed ID: 19322090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Neonatal hearing screening. A comparison of automatic auditory brainstem audiometry and otoacoustic emissions].
    Pedersen L; Møller TR; Wetke R; Ovesen T
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2008 Feb; 170(8):642-6. PubMed ID: 18364157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Neonatal hearing screening with transient evoked otoacoustic emissions in Western Saudi Arabia.
    Habib HS; Abdelgaffar H
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2005 Jun; 69(6):839-42. PubMed ID: 15885338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The proper time for hearing screening in newborns.
    Burdzgla I; Pietsch M; Chkhartishvili B; Kevanishvili Z
    Georgian Med News; 2007 Mar; (144):24-7. PubMed ID: 17473328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effect of the number of averaged responses on the measurement of transiently evoked otoacoustic emissions in newborns.
    Korres SG; Balatsouras DG; Nikolopoulos T; Korres GS; Economou NC; Ferekidis E
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2006 Mar; 70(3):429-33. PubMed ID: 16140396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An alternative strategy for universal infant hearing screening in tertiary hospitals with a high delivery rate, within a developing country, using transient evoked oto-acoustic emissions and brainstem evoked response audiometry.
    Mathur NN; Dhawan R
    J Laryngol Otol; 2007 Jul; 121(7):639-43. PubMed ID: 17112395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Hearing screening of 10,501 newborns].
    Nie WY; Gong LX; Liu YJ; Xiang LL; Lin Q; Qi YS; Nie YJ
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2003 Feb; 83(4):274-7. PubMed ID: 12812640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Screening project of identification of hearing deficits in newborns].
    Møller TR; Jensen FK; Ekmann A; Wetke R; Ovesen T
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2007 Mar; 169(10):900-3. PubMed ID: 17359732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Reliability of hearing screening in high-risk neonates: comparative study of otoacoustic emission, automated and conventional auditory brainstem response.
    Suppiej A; Rizzardi E; Zanardo V; Franzoi M; Ermani M; Orzan E
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2007 Apr; 118(4):869-76. PubMed ID: 17317296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Infant hearing screening: effects of timeline.
    Tsui PW; McPherson B; Wong EC; Ng IH
    Clin Otolaryngol; 2008 Apr; 33(2):108-12. PubMed ID: 18429859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Is universal newborn hearing screening more efficient with auditory evoked potentials compared to otoacoustic emissions?].
    Granell J; Gavilanes J; Herrero J; Sánchez-Jara JL; Velasco MJ; Martín G
    Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp; 2008 Apr; 59(4):170-5. PubMed ID: 18447975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Otoacoustic emissions for newborn hearing screening].
    Liao H; Wu Z; Zhou T
    Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 1999 Feb; 34(1):21-4. PubMed ID: 12764789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.