These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

90 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16173368)

  • 1. Instructions and word bias in a lexical decision task.
    Piercey CD
    Psychol Rep; 2005 Jun; 96(3 Pt 2):995-1001. PubMed ID: 16173368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Emphasizing nonword decisions in word-decision performance.
    Piercey CD
    Psychol Rep; 2008 Aug; 103(1):97-101. PubMed ID: 18982942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Sequential effects in the lexical decision task: the role of the item frequency of the previous trial.
    Perea M; Carreiras M
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2003 Apr; 56(3):385-401. PubMed ID: 12745840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Automaticity in fast lexical decision sequential effects: much like telling left from right.
    Garton R; Davidson JA
    Psychol Res; 2016 Jul; 80(4):685-701. PubMed ID: 26040577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Nonword repetition priming in lexical decision reverses as a function of study task and speed stress.
    Zeelenberg R; Wagenmakers EJ; Shiffrin RM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2004 Jan; 30(1):270-7. PubMed ID: 14736311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Influence of neighborhood size and exposure duration on visual-word recognition: evidence with the yes/no and the go/no-go lexical decision tasks.
    Perea M; Rosa E; Gómez C
    Percept Psychophys; 2003 Feb; 65(2):273-86. PubMed ID: 12713243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Responding to nonwords in the lexical decision task: Insights from the English Lexicon Project.
    Yap MJ; Sibley DE; Balota DA; Ratcliff R; Rueckl J
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2015 May; 41(3):597-613. PubMed ID: 25329078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A dissociative word-frequency X levels-of-processing interaction in episodic recognition and lexical decision tasks.
    Duchek JM; Neely JH
    Mem Cognit; 1989 Mar; 17(2):148-62. PubMed ID: 2927313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. How to say "no" to a nonword: a leaky competing accumulator model of lexical decision.
    Dufau S; Grainger J; Ziegler JC
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2012 Jul; 38(4):1117-28. PubMed ID: 22746955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Primed lexical decision task in fearful and nonfearful individuals.
    Christopherson KM; Ferraro FR
    J Psychol; 2009 May; 143(3):267-78. PubMed ID: 19455855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Is the go/no-go lexical decision task preferable to the yes/no task with developing readers?
    Moret-Tatay C; Perea M
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2011 Sep; 110(1):125-32. PubMed ID: 21565360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Lexical inhibition and sublexical facilitation are surprisingly long lasting.
    Sumner M; Samuel AG
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Jul; 33(4):769-90. PubMed ID: 17576153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Single- versus dual-process models of lexical decision performance: insights from response time distributional analysis.
    Yap MJ; Balota DA; Cortese MJ; Watson JM
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Dec; 32(6):1324-44. PubMed ID: 17154775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Neural correlates of lexical access during visual word recognition.
    Binder JR; McKiernan KA; Parsons ME; Westbury CF; Possing ET; Kaufman JN; Buchanan L
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2003 Apr; 15(3):372-93. PubMed ID: 12729490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A model for evidence accumulation in the lexical decision task.
    Wagenmakers EJ; Steyvers M; Raaijmakers JG; Shiffrin RM; van Rijn H; Zeelenberg R
    Cogn Psychol; 2004 May; 48(3):332-67. PubMed ID: 15020215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Making things difficult in lexical decision: the impact of pseudohomophones and transposed-letter nonwords on frequency and semantic priming effects.
    Lupker SJ; Pexman PM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Sep; 36(5):1267-89. PubMed ID: 20804296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [The influence of visualization of orthography on the recognition of written words].
    Mathey S
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2001 Mar; 55(1):1-23. PubMed ID: 11301725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Lexical decision and the number of morphemes and affixes.
    Muncer SJ; Knight DC; Adams JW
    Scand J Psychol; 2013 Oct; 54(5):349-52. PubMed ID: 23829866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reaction time reduction after parafoveal preview in a lexical decision task.
    Grieco A; Beretta G; Casco C
    Percept Mot Skills; 2006 Aug; 103(1):5-13. PubMed ID: 17037638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Functional Anatomy of Recognition of Chinese Multi-Character Words: Convergent Evidence from Effects of Transposable Nonwords, Lexicality, and Word Frequency.
    Lin N; Yu X; Zhao Y; Zhang M
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(2):e0149583. PubMed ID: 26901644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.