157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16173504)
1. Gonzales v. Raich. In the Supreme Court of the United States.
Bostrom BA
Issues Law Med; 2005; 21(1):47-56. PubMed ID: 16173504
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Gonzales v. Raich: federalism as a casualty of the war on drugs.
Somin I
Cornell J Law Public Policy; 2006; 15(3):507-50. PubMed ID: 17593582
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Medical marijuana, American federalism, and the Supreme Court.
Gostin LO
JAMA; 2005 Aug; 294(7):842-4. PubMed ID: 16106011
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Court decision on medical marijuana use worries patient advocates.
Krisberg K
Nations Health; 2005 Aug; 35(6):1,14. PubMed ID: 16130240
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. U.S. Supreme Court hears oral arguments in Ashcroft v. Raich background.
Laughlin C
J Law Med Ethics; 2005; 33(2):396-9. PubMed ID: 16083100
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Gonzales v Raich: the US supreme court's consideration captured the public policy debate about the medical use of marijuana.
Lorber L
Gend Med; 2005 Sep; 2(3):124-30. PubMed ID: 16290884
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Not DEA'd yet: Gonzales v. Oregon.
Baron CH
Hastings Cent Rep; 2006; 36(2):8. PubMed ID: 16604888
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The Pain Relief Promotion Act: Congress's misguided intervention into end-of-life care.
Buzzee SE
Univ Cincinnati Law Rev; 2001; 70(1):217-49. PubMed ID: 16389683
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Jumping frogs, endangered toads, and California's medical-marijuana law.
Annas GJ
N Engl J Med; 2005 Nov; 353(21):2291-6. PubMed ID: 16306529
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Medical marijuana and the Supreme Court.
Okie S
N Engl J Med; 2005 Aug; 353(7):648-51. PubMed ID: 16107619
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Thwarting assisted suicide threatens palliative care.
Meisel A
Med Ethics (Burlingt Mass); 2003; 10(1):4, 8. PubMed ID: 16175723
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Justices reject U.S. bid to block assisted suicide; Court, 6-3, says attorney general was wrong in Oregon case.
Greenhouse L
N Y Times Web; 2006 Jan; ():A1, A16. PubMed ID: 16432926
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Gonzales v. Oregon and the politics of medicine.
Lindsay RA
Kennedy Inst Ethics J; 2006 Mar; 16(1):99-104. PubMed ID: 16770893
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Gonzales v. Raich: implications for public health policy.
Rosenbaum S
Public Health Rep; 2005; 120(6):680-2. PubMed ID: 16350339
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Supreme Court rejects attack on medical marijuana.
Wolski K
N J Nurse; 2003 Dec; 33(9):2-3. PubMed ID: 14746112
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Drug enforcement: Controlled Substances Act inapplicable to medicinal marijuana.
Muldrew BL
J Law Med Ethics; 2004; 32(2):371-2. PubMed ID: 15301203
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Clearing the air: what the latest Supreme Court decision regarding medical marijuana really means.
Aggarwal S; Carter GT; Steinborn JJ
Am J Hosp Palliat Care; 2005; 22(5):327-9. PubMed ID: 16225351
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Congress, controlled substances, and physician-assisted suicide--elephants in mouseholes.
Annas GJ
N Engl J Med; 2006 Mar; 354(10):1079-84. PubMed ID: 16525147
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The Supreme Court and the purposes of medicine.
Bloche MG
N Engl J Med; 2006 Mar; 354(10):993-5. PubMed ID: 16525134
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Legalization of medical marijuana (Cannabis).
Porche DJ
Am J Mens Health; 2013 Nov; 7(6):449. PubMed ID: 24027206
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
