These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16173505)

  • 1. Brief for the petitioners. Gonzales v. State of Oregon.
    Clement PD; Keisler PD; Kneedler ES; Katsas GG; Hallward-Driemeier D; Stern MB; Levy JH
    Issues Law Med; 2005; 21(1):59-75. PubMed ID: 16173505
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The assisted-suicide decision.
    N Y Times Web; 2006 Jan; ():A22. PubMed ID: 16429626
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Justices reject U.S. bid to block assisted suicide; Court, 6-3, says attorney general was wrong in Oregon case.
    Greenhouse L
    N Y Times Web; 2006 Jan; ():A1, A16. PubMed ID: 16432926
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Gonzales v. Oregon and the politics of medicine.
    Lindsay RA
    Kennedy Inst Ethics J; 2006 Mar; 16(1):99-104. PubMed ID: 16770893
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Physician-assisted suicide in Oregon--an uncertain future.
    Steinbrook R
    N Engl J Med; 2002 Feb; 346(6):460-4. PubMed ID: 11832544
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Justices accept case weighing assisted suicide.
    Greenhouse L
    N Y Times Web; 2005 Feb; ():A1, A14. PubMed ID: 15742514
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The Oregon Death with Dignity Act: a successful model or a legal anomaly vulnerable to attack?
    Boyle B
    Houst Law Rev; 2004; 40(5):1387-421. PubMed ID: 16189902
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Justices explore U.S. authority over states in assisted suicide.
    Greenhouse L
    N Y Times Web; 2005 Oct; ():A1, A32. PubMed ID: 16231463
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The Supreme Court and the purposes of medicine.
    Bloche MG
    N Engl J Med; 2006 Mar; 354(10):993-5. PubMed ID: 16525134
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Fraught issue, but narrow ruling in Oregon suicide case.
    Egan T; Liptak A
    N Y Times Web; 2006 Jan; ():A16. PubMed ID: 16429627
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The U.S. Attorney General's intrusion into medical practice.
    Lowenstein E; Wanzer SH
    N Engl J Med; 2002 Feb; 346(6):447-8. PubMed ID: 11832536
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Who defines "legitimate medical practice?" Lessons learned from the Controlled Substances Act, physician-assisted suicide, and Oregon v. Ashcroft.
    Gast S
    Va J Soc Policy Law; 2002; 10(2):261-91. PubMed ID: 16493846
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Not DEA'd yet: Gonzales v. Oregon.
    Baron CH
    Hastings Cent Rep; 2006; 36(2):8. PubMed ID: 16604888
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Congress, controlled substances, and physician-assisted suicide--elephants in mouseholes.
    Annas GJ
    N Engl J Med; 2006 Mar; 354(10):1079-84. PubMed ID: 16525147
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Terri Schiavo and beyond.
    Bull Med Ethics; 2005 Mar; (206):5-6. PubMed ID: 16830427
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. U.S. acts to stop assisted suicides.
    Verhovek SH
    N Y Times Web; 2001 Nov; ():A1, A20. PubMed ID: 12159883
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The war on assisted suicide.
    Schwarz JK
    Am J Nurs; 2002 Mar; 102(3):11. PubMed ID: 11976517
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Oregon v. Ashcroft: the battle over the soul of medicine.
    Rich BA
    Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 2003; 12(3):310-21. PubMed ID: 12889338
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A death by any other name: the federal government's inconsistent treatment of drugs used in lethal injections and physician-assisted suicide.
    Miller C
    J Law Health; 2002-2003; 17(2):217-40. PubMed ID: 15853126
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Oregon v. Ashcroft.
    United States. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
    Wests Fed Rep; 2004; 368():1118-49. PubMed ID: 16477722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.