These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16173674)

  • 1. Feature binding in children and young adults.
    Lorsbach TC; Reimer JF
    J Genet Psychol; 2005 Sep; 166(3):313-27. PubMed ID: 16173674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. When do spatial and visual working memory interact?
    Wood JN
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Feb; 73(2):420-39. PubMed ID: 21264717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Binding, relational memory, and recall of naturalistic events: a developmental perspective.
    Sluzenski J; Newcombe NS; Kovacs SL
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Jan; 32(1):89-100. PubMed ID: 16478343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. How object-specific are object files? Evidence for integration by location.
    van Dam WO; Hommel B
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Oct; 36(5):1184-92. PubMed ID: 20718565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The time course of object-feature retrieval in recognition.
    Lamberts K; Kent C
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 May; 34(3):688-95. PubMed ID: 18444765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Consolidation of multifeature items in visual working memory: central capacity requirements for visual consolidation.
    Stevanovski B; Jolicœur P
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 May; 73(4):1108-19. PubMed ID: 21327744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Binding and inhibition in working memory: individual and age differences in short-term recognition.
    Oberauer K
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2005 Aug; 134(3):368-87. PubMed ID: 16131269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Temporal limitations in the effective binding of attended target attributes in the mutual masking of visual objects.
    Hommuk K; Bachmann T
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Jun; 35(3):648-60. PubMed ID: 19485683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Gender differences in memory for objects and their locations: a study on automatic versus controlled encoding and retrieval contexts.
    De Goede M; Postma A
    Brain Cogn; 2008 Apr; 66(3):232-42. PubMed ID: 17950509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The interaction between memorized objects and abrupt onsets in oculomotor capture.
    Wong JH; Peterson MS
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Aug; 73(6):1768-79. PubMed ID: 21533921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Age differences between children and young adults in the dynamics of dual-task prioritization: body (balance) versus mind (memory).
    Schaefer S; Krampe RT; Lindenberger U; Baltes PB
    Dev Psychol; 2008 May; 44(3):747-57. PubMed ID: 18473641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. What was where? Memory for object locations.
    Postma A; De Haan EH
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 1996 Feb; 49(1):178-99. PubMed ID: 8920102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The what-where trade-off in multiple-identity tracking.
    Cohen MA; Pinto Y; Howe PD; Horowitz TS
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Jul; 73(5):1422-34. PubMed ID: 21380611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Scene and position specificity in visual memory for objects.
    Hollingworth A
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Jan; 32(1):58-69. PubMed ID: 16478340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Wistar rats show episodic-like memory for unique experiences.
    Kart-Teke E; De Souza Silva MA; Huston JP; Dere E
    Neurobiol Learn Mem; 2006 Mar; 85(2):173-82. PubMed ID: 16290193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Object-position binding in visual memory for natural scenes and object arrays.
    Hollingworth A
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Feb; 33(1):31-47. PubMed ID: 17311477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Demands on attention and the role of response priming in visual discrimination of feature conjunctions.
    Fournier LR; Herbert RJ; Farris C
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2004 Oct; 30(5):836-52. PubMed ID: 15462624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Working memory, perceptual priming, and the perception of hierarchical forms: opposite effects of priming and working memory without memory refreshing.
    Kim JI; Humphreys GW
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Aug; 72(6):1533-55. PubMed ID: 20675799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Very young children are insensitive to picture- but not object-orientation.
    Pierroutsakos SL; Deloache JS; Gound M; Bernard EN
    Dev Sci; 2005 Jul; 8(4):326-32. PubMed ID: 15985066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Age differences in what is viewed and remembered in complex conjunction search.
    Williams CC; Zacks RT; Henderson JM
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 May; 62(5):946-66. PubMed ID: 18932061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.