131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16173674)
1. Feature binding in children and young adults.
Lorsbach TC; Reimer JF
J Genet Psychol; 2005 Sep; 166(3):313-27. PubMed ID: 16173674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. When do spatial and visual working memory interact?
Wood JN
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Feb; 73(2):420-39. PubMed ID: 21264717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Binding, relational memory, and recall of naturalistic events: a developmental perspective.
Sluzenski J; Newcombe NS; Kovacs SL
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Jan; 32(1):89-100. PubMed ID: 16478343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. How object-specific are object files? Evidence for integration by location.
van Dam WO; Hommel B
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Oct; 36(5):1184-92. PubMed ID: 20718565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The time course of object-feature retrieval in recognition.
Lamberts K; Kent C
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 May; 34(3):688-95. PubMed ID: 18444765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Consolidation of multifeature items in visual working memory: central capacity requirements for visual consolidation.
Stevanovski B; Jolicœur P
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 May; 73(4):1108-19. PubMed ID: 21327744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Binding and inhibition in working memory: individual and age differences in short-term recognition.
Oberauer K
J Exp Psychol Gen; 2005 Aug; 134(3):368-87. PubMed ID: 16131269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Temporal limitations in the effective binding of attended target attributes in the mutual masking of visual objects.
Hommuk K; Bachmann T
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Jun; 35(3):648-60. PubMed ID: 19485683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Gender differences in memory for objects and their locations: a study on automatic versus controlled encoding and retrieval contexts.
De Goede M; Postma A
Brain Cogn; 2008 Apr; 66(3):232-42. PubMed ID: 17950509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The interaction between memorized objects and abrupt onsets in oculomotor capture.
Wong JH; Peterson MS
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Aug; 73(6):1768-79. PubMed ID: 21533921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Age differences between children and young adults in the dynamics of dual-task prioritization: body (balance) versus mind (memory).
Schaefer S; Krampe RT; Lindenberger U; Baltes PB
Dev Psychol; 2008 May; 44(3):747-57. PubMed ID: 18473641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. What was where? Memory for object locations.
Postma A; De Haan EH
Q J Exp Psychol A; 1996 Feb; 49(1):178-99. PubMed ID: 8920102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The what-where trade-off in multiple-identity tracking.
Cohen MA; Pinto Y; Howe PD; Horowitz TS
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Jul; 73(5):1422-34. PubMed ID: 21380611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Scene and position specificity in visual memory for objects.
Hollingworth A
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Jan; 32(1):58-69. PubMed ID: 16478340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Wistar rats show episodic-like memory for unique experiences.
Kart-Teke E; De Souza Silva MA; Huston JP; Dere E
Neurobiol Learn Mem; 2006 Mar; 85(2):173-82. PubMed ID: 16290193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Object-position binding in visual memory for natural scenes and object arrays.
Hollingworth A
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Feb; 33(1):31-47. PubMed ID: 17311477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Demands on attention and the role of response priming in visual discrimination of feature conjunctions.
Fournier LR; Herbert RJ; Farris C
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2004 Oct; 30(5):836-52. PubMed ID: 15462624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Working memory, perceptual priming, and the perception of hierarchical forms: opposite effects of priming and working memory without memory refreshing.
Kim JI; Humphreys GW
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Aug; 72(6):1533-55. PubMed ID: 20675799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Very young children are insensitive to picture- but not object-orientation.
Pierroutsakos SL; Deloache JS; Gound M; Bernard EN
Dev Sci; 2005 Jul; 8(4):326-32. PubMed ID: 15985066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Age differences in what is viewed and remembered in complex conjunction search.
Williams CC; Zacks RT; Henderson JM
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 May; 62(5):946-66. PubMed ID: 18932061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
