BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16173967)

  • 1. Screening for thrombophilia in high-risk situations: a meta-analysis and cost-effectiveness analysis.
    Wu O; Robertson L; Twaddle S; Lowe G; Clark P; Walker I; Brenkel I; Greaves M; Langhorne P; Regan L; Greer I;
    Br J Haematol; 2005 Oct; 131(1):80-90. PubMed ID: 16173967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Screening for thrombophilia in high-risk situations: systematic review and cost-effectiveness analysis. The Thrombosis: Risk and Economic Assessment of Thrombophilia Screening (TREATS) study.
    Wu O; Robertson L; Twaddle S; Lowe GD; Clark P; Greaves M; Walker ID; Langhorne P; Brenkel I; Regan L; Greer I
    Health Technol Assess; 2006 Apr; 10(11):1-110. PubMed ID: 16595080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Is screening for thrombophilia cost-effective?
    Wu O; Greer IA
    Curr Opin Hematol; 2007 Sep; 14(5):500-3. PubMed ID: 17934357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Universal or selected screening for thrombophilia.
    Keeling D
    Br J Haematol; 2006 Apr; 133(1):106-7. PubMed ID: 16512838
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Can a change in screening and prescribing practice reduce the risk of venous thromboembolism in women taking the combined oral contraceptive pill?
    Mills A; Wilkinson C; Fotherby K
    Br J Fam Plann; 1998 Jan; 23(4):112-5. PubMed ID: 9882763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Screening for thrombophilia.
    Blickstein D
    Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am; 2006 Sep; 33(3):389-95. PubMed ID: 16962916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evidence-based indications for thrombophilia screening.
    Lindhoff-Last E; Luxembourg B
    Vasa; 2008 Feb; 37(1):19-30. PubMed ID: 18512539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Using thrombophilia testing to determine anticoagulation duration in pediatric thrombosis is not cost-effective.
    O'Brien SH; Smith KJ
    J Pediatr; 2009 Jul; 155(1):100-4. PubMed ID: 19324372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Thrombophilia and the risk of thromboembolic events in women on oral contraceptives and hormone replacement therapy.
    DeSancho MT; Dorff T; Rand JH
    Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis; 2010 Sep; 21(6):534-8. PubMed ID: 20581664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Oral contraception and thrombophilia.
    Blickstein D; Blickstein I
    Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Aug; 19(4):370-6. PubMed ID: 17625421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Should female relatives of factor V Leiden carriers be screened prior to oral contraceptive use? A cost-effectiveness analysis.
    Smith KJ; Monsef BS; Ragni MV
    Thromb Haemost; 2008 Sep; 100(3):447-52. PubMed ID: 18766261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Hormonal contraceptives as a risk factor for cerebral venous and sinus thrombosis.
    Saadatnia M; Tajmirriahi M
    Acta Neurol Scand; 2007 May; 115(5):295-300. PubMed ID: 17489938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Who should be tested for thrombophilia?
    Simioni P
    Curr Opin Hematol; 2006 Sep; 13(5):337-43. PubMed ID: 16888438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Oral contraceptives and inherited thrombophilia: a gene-environment interaction with a risk of venous thrombosis?
    Mac Gillavry MR; Prins MH
    Semin Thromb Hemost; 2003 Apr; 29(2):219-26. PubMed ID: 12709926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cost-effectiveness analysis of endometrial cancer prevention strategies for obese women.
    Kwon JS; Lu KH
    Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Jul; 112(1):56-63. PubMed ID: 18591308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Hormone therapy and thromboembolic disease.
    Battaglioli T; Martinelli I
    Curr Opin Hematol; 2007 Sep; 14(5):488-93. PubMed ID: 17934355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Routine antenatal thrombophilia screening in high-risk pregnancies: a decision analysis.
    Woodham PC; Boggess KA; Gardner MO; Doyle NM
    Am J Perinatol; 2011 Jun; 28(6):495-500. PubMed ID: 21380983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Screening for familial intracranial aneurysms: decision and cost-effectiveness analysis.
    Takao H; Nojo T; Ohtomo K
    Acad Radiol; 2008 Apr; 15(4):462-71. PubMed ID: 18342771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [A multicentre randomised clinical trial to evaluate the benefit of testing for thrombophilia following a first venous thromboembolism: the NOSTRADAMUS study].
    Cohn DM; Middeldorp S
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2007 Feb; 151(6):371-3. PubMed ID: 17352304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cost-effectiveness of osteoporosis screening and treatment with hormone replacement therapy, raloxifene, or alendronate.
    Mobley LR; Hoerger TJ; Wittenborn JS; Galuska DA; Rao JK
    Med Decis Making; 2006; 26(2):194-206. PubMed ID: 16525173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.