These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16175372)

  • 1. Short-wavelength automated perimetry in patients with migraine.
    Yenice O; Temel A; Incili B; Tuncer N
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2006 May; 244(5):589-95. PubMed ID: 16175372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Conventional perimetry, short-wavelength automated perimetry, frequency-doubling technology, and visual evoked potentials in the assessment of patients with multiple sclerosis.
    Corallo G; Cicinelli S; Papadia M; Bandini F; Uccelli A; Calabria G
    Eur J Ophthalmol; 2005; 15(6):730-8. PubMed ID: 16329058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Structure and function evaluation (SAFE): I. criteria for glaucomatous visual field loss using standard automated perimetry (SAP) and short wavelength automated perimetry (SWAP).
    Johnson CA; Sample PA; Cioffi GA; Liebmann JR; Weinreb RN
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2002 Aug; 134(2):177-85. PubMed ID: 12140023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Frequency doubling perimetry and short-wavelength automated perimetry to detect early glaucoma.
    Leeprechanon N; Giaconi JA; Manassakorn A; Hoffman D; Caprioli J
    Ophthalmology; 2007 May; 114(5):931-7. PubMed ID: 17397926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Short-wavelength sensitivity deficits in patients with migraine.
    McKendrick AM; Cioffi GA; Johnson CA
    Arch Ophthalmol; 2002 Feb; 120(2):154-61. PubMed ID: 11831917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of standard automated perimetry, frequency-doubling technology perimetry, and short-wavelength automated perimetry for detection of glaucoma.
    Liu S; Lam S; Weinreb RN; Ye C; Cheung CY; Lai G; Lam DS; Leung CK
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2011 Sep; 52(10):7325-31. PubMed ID: 21810975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [A comparative analysis of standard automated perimetry and short wavelength automated perimetry in early diagnosis of glaucoma].
    Chiseliţă D; Crenguţa MI; Danielescu C; Mihaela NM
    Oftalmologia; 2006; 50(2):94-102. PubMed ID: 16927766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assessment of spatial-contrast function and short-wavelength sensitivity deficits in patients with migraine.
    Yenice O; Onal S; Incili B; Temel A; Afşar N; Tanridağ T
    Eye (Lond); 2007 Feb; 21(2):218-23. PubMed ID: 16456594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Short-wavelength automated perimetry in neuro-ophthalmologic disorders.
    Keltner JL; Johnson CA
    Arch Ophthalmol; 1995 Apr; 113(4):475-81. PubMed ID: 7710398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Identifying glaucomatous vision loss with visual-function-specific perimetry in the diagnostic innovations in glaucoma study.
    Sample PA; Medeiros FA; Racette L; Pascual JP; Boden C; Zangwill LM; Bowd C; Weinreb RN
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2006 Aug; 47(8):3381-9. PubMed ID: 16877406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Glaucomatous damage patterns by short-wavelength automated perimetry (SWAP) in glaucoma suspects.
    Polo V; Larrosa JM; Pinilla I; Gonzalvo F; Ferreras A; Honrubia FM
    Eur J Ophthalmol; 2002; 12(1):49-54. PubMed ID: 11936444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Multifocal objective perimetry in the detection of glaucomatous field loss.
    Goldberg I; Graham SL; Klistorner AI
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2002 Jan; 133(1):29-39. PubMed ID: 11755837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Detection of early visual field loss in glaucoma using frequency-doubling perimetry and short-wavelength automated perimetry.
    Landers JA; Goldberg I; Graham SL
    Arch Ophthalmol; 2003 Dec; 121(12):1705-10. PubMed ID: 14662589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evidence for a learning effect in short-wavelength automated perimetry.
    Wild JM; Kim LS; Pacey IE; Cunliffe IA
    Ophthalmology; 2006 Feb; 113(2):206-15. PubMed ID: 16458091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Frequency-doubling perimetry: comparison with standard automated perimetry to detect glaucoma.
    Leeprechanon N; Giangiacomo A; Fontana H; Hoffman D; Caprioli J
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2007 Feb; 143(2):263-271. PubMed ID: 17178091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Can frequency-doubling technology and short-wavelength automated perimetries detect visual field defects before standard automated perimetry in patients with preperimetric glaucoma?
    Ferreras A; Polo V; Larrosa JM; Pablo LE; Pajarin AB; Pueyo V; Honrubia FM
    J Glaucoma; 2007; 16(4):372-83. PubMed ID: 17571000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Detection of glaucomatous visual field defect by nonconventional perimetry.
    Iester M; Altieri M; Vittone P; Calabria G; Zingirian M; Traverso CE
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2003 Jan; 135(1):35-9. PubMed ID: 12504694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison between indices of Humphrey matrix and Humphrey perimetry in early glaucoma patients and normal subjects.
    Hong S; Yeom HY; Kim CY; Seong GJ
    Ann Ophthalmol (Skokie); 2007; 39(4):318-20. PubMed ID: 18025653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Isolation of short-wavelength sensitive mechanisms in normal and glaucomatous visual field regions.
    Demirel S; Johnson CA
    J Glaucoma; 2000 Feb; 9(1):63-73. PubMed ID: 10708234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Is visual field evaluation using multiple correlations and linear regressions useful? An evaluation of Delphi perimetry.
    Wishart PK; Wardrop DR; Kosmin AS
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 1998 Jul; 236(7):493-500. PubMed ID: 9672794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.