These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16176373)

  • 21. Working memory constraints on syntactic processing: an electrophysiological investigation.
    Vos SH; Gunter TC; Kolk HH; Mulder G
    Psychophysiology; 2001 Jan; 38(1):41-63. PubMed ID: 11321620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Examining task-dependencies of different attentional processes as reflected in the P3a and reorienting negativity components of the human event-related brain potential.
    Munka L; Berti S
    Neurosci Lett; 2006 Apr; 396(3):177-81. PubMed ID: 16356637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Electrophysiological evidence for the time-course of verifying text ideas.
    Ferretti TR; Singer M; Patterson C
    Cognition; 2008 Sep; 108(3):881-8. PubMed ID: 18675957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. When loading working memory reduces distraction: behavioral and electrophysiological evidence from an auditory-visual distraction paradigm.
    SanMiguel I; Corral MJ; Escera C
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2008 Jul; 20(7):1131-45. PubMed ID: 18284343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Emotion and attention in visual word processing: an ERP study.
    Kissler J; Herbert C; Winkler I; Junghofer M
    Biol Psychol; 2009 Jan; 80(1):75-83. PubMed ID: 18439739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Remembered but unused: the accessory items in working memory that do not guide attention.
    Peters JC; Goebel R; Roelfsema PR
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Jun; 21(6):1081-91. PubMed ID: 18702589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Inferences during story comprehension: cortical recruitment affected by predictability of events and working memory capacity.
    Virtue S; Parrish T; Jung-Beeman M
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2008 Dec; 20(12):2274-84. PubMed ID: 18457505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Sequential neural processes of tactile-visual crossmodal working memory.
    Ohara S; Lenz F; Zhou YD
    Neuroscience; 2006 Apr; 139(1):299-309. PubMed ID: 16324794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Event-related potentials elicited during parsing of ambiguous relative clauses in Spanish.
    Carreiras M; Salillas E; Barber H
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2004 Jun; 20(1):98-105. PubMed ID: 15130594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Canonical word order and interference-based integration costs during sentence comprehension: the case of Spanish subject- and object-relative clauses.
    del Río D; López-Higes R; Martín-Aragoneses MT
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2012; 65(11):2108-28. PubMed ID: 22524672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Mental lexicon and derivational rules.
    Palmović M; Maricić A
    Coll Antropol; 2008 Jan; 32 Suppl 1():177-81. PubMed ID: 18405079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The impact of prefrontal cortex for selective attention in a visual working memory task.
    Schreppel TJ; Pauli P; Ellgring H; Fallgatter AJ; Herrmann MJ
    Int J Neurosci; 2008 Dec; 118(12):1673-88. PubMed ID: 18937114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Subject relative clauses are not universally easier to process: Evidence from Basque.
    Carreiras M; Duñabeitia JA; Vergara M; de la Cruz-Pavía I; Laka I
    Cognition; 2010 Apr; 115(1):79-92. PubMed ID: 20035934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. On why the elderly have normal semantic retrieval but deficient episodic encoding: a study of left inferior frontal ERP activity.
    Nessler D; Johnson R; Bersick M; Friedman D
    Neuroimage; 2006 Mar; 30(1):299-312. PubMed ID: 16242350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Working memory effects on semantic processing: priming differences in pars orbitalis.
    Sabb FW; Bilder RM; Chou M; Bookheimer SY
    Neuroimage; 2007 Aug; 37(1):311-22. PubMed ID: 17555989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Processing the universal quantifier during sentence comprehension: ERP evidence.
    Jiang X; Tan Y; Zhou X
    Neuropsychologia; 2009 Jul; 47(8-9):1799-815. PubMed ID: 19428412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. On the universality of language comprehension strategies: evidence from Turkish.
    Demiral SB; Schlesewsky M; Bornkessel-Schlesewsky I
    Cognition; 2008 Jan; 106(1):484-500. PubMed ID: 17336956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Word category and verb--argument structure information in the dynamics of parsing.
    Frisch S; Hahne A; Friederici AD
    Cognition; 2004 Apr; 91(3):191-219. PubMed ID: 15168895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The propositional structure of discourse in the two cerebral hemispheres.
    Long DL; Baynes K; Prat CS
    Brain Lang; 2005 Dec; 95(3):383-94. PubMed ID: 16298668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Do discourse global coherence and cumulated information impact on sentence syntactic processing? An event-related brain potentials study.
    Hernández-Gutiérrez D; Jiménez-Ortega L; Fondevila S; Casado P; Muñoz F; Martín-Loeches M
    Brain Res; 2016 Jan; 1630():109-19. PubMed ID: 26569131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.