150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16179297)
41. The ethical neuroscientist.
Nat Neurosci; 2008 Mar; 11(3):239. PubMed ID: 18301426
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
42. The limitations of "vulnerability" as a protection for human research participants.
Levine C; Faden R; Grady C; Hammerschmidt D; Eckenwiler L; Sugarman J;
Am J Bioeth; 2004; 4(3):44-9. PubMed ID: 16192138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Waste not, want not: cognitive impairment should not preclude research participation.
Hougham GW
Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(1):36-7; author reply W15-8. PubMed ID: 16036655
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
44. Does research ethics rest on a mistake?
Miller FG
Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(1):34-6; author reply W15-8. PubMed ID: 16036654
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
45. Use of healthy children as volunteers in drug studies: the ethical debate.
Koren G; Kearns GL; Reed M; Pons G
Clin Pharmacol Ther; 2003 Mar; 73(3):147-52. PubMed ID: 12621379
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
46. Why researchers cannot establish equipoise.
Veatch RM
Am J Bioeth; 2006; 6(4):55-7. PubMed ID: 16885108
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
47. Making research a requirement of treatment: why we should sometimes let doctors pressure patients to participate in research.
Orentlicher D
Hastings Cent Rep; 2005; 35(5):20-8. PubMed ID: 16295261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Human subjects research with prisoners: putting the ethical question in context.
Obasogie OK; Reiter KA
Bioethics; 2011 Jan; 25(1):55-6. PubMed ID: 21158873
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
49. Research versus innovation: real differences.
Morreim H
Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(1):42-3; author reply W15-8. PubMed ID: 16036658
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
50. Trust, understanding and utopia in the research setting.
Justo L
Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(1):56-8; author reply W15-8. PubMed ID: 16036665
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
51. Clinical value: the neglected axis in the system of research ethics.
Karlawish JH
Account Res; 1999; 7(2-4):255-64. PubMed ID: 11658180
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
52. Striking the right balance in research ethics and regulation.
Miller FG
Am J Bioeth; 2010 Aug; 10(8):65. PubMed ID: 20694916
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
53. "Vulnerability" in context: recognizing the sociopolitical influences.
Campbell AT
Am J Bioeth; 2004; 4(3):58-9; discussion W32. PubMed ID: 16192143
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
54. Considering behavioral and biomedical research on detainees in the mental health unit of an urban mega-jail.
Brakel SJ
N Engl J Crim Civ Confin; 1996; 22(1):1-27. PubMed ID: 11660427
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
55. Ethics in research.
Macklin R
CBE Views; 1981; 4(4):12-8. PubMed ID: 11649549
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
56. Paying human subjects in research: where are we, how did we get here, and now what?
VanderWalde A; Kurzban S
J Law Med Ethics; 2011; 39(3):543-58. PubMed ID: 21871049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. The paradoxical case of payment as benefit to research subjects.
Macklin R
IRB; 1989; 11(6):1-3. PubMed ID: 11650284
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
58. On the morality of Guinea-pig recruitment.
Valdman M
Bioethics; 2010 Jul; 24(6):287-94. PubMed ID: 19222441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Between the needy and the greedy: the quest for a just and fair ethics of clinical research.
Garrafa V; Solbakk JH; Vidal S; Lorenzo C
J Med Ethics; 2010 Aug; 36(8):500-4. PubMed ID: 20663769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Money, coercion, and undue inducement: attitudes about payments to research participants.
Largent EA; Grady C; Miller FG; Wertheimer A
IRB; 2012; 34(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 22338401
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
