171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16179301)
1. Subject protection and the risk-benefit relationship.
Schonfeld TL; Brown JS; Gordon BG
Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(5):22-3. PubMed ID: 16179301
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Undue inducements and reasonable risks: will the dismal science lead to dismal research ethics?
London AJ
Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(5):29-32. PubMed ID: 16179305
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Undue inducement: the only objection to payment?
VanderWalde A
Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(5):25-7. PubMed ID: 16179303
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Undue inducement: nonsense on stilts?
Emanuel EJ
Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(5):9-13; discussion W8-11, W17. PubMed ID: 16179296
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Nice work if you can get it.
Reid L
Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(5):27-9. PubMed ID: 16179304
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. "Undue inducement' as coercive offers.
McGregor J
Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(5):24-5. PubMed ID: 16179302
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The importance of social, cultural, and economic contexts, and empirical research in examining "undue inducement".
Klitzman R
Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(5):19-21. PubMed ID: 16179300
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. A quartet of criticisms.
Vanderpool HY
Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(5):16-9. PubMed ID: 16179299
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Gather ye shibboleths while ye may.
Fost N
Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(5):14-5. PubMed ID: 16179297
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Letter to the editor: Would you know an undue inducement if you saw one?
Schwab AP
Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(5):W17. PubMed ID: 16179291
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. How not to rethink research ethics.
Beauchamp TL
Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(1):31-3; author reply W15-8. PubMed ID: 16036653
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The welcome reassessment of research ethics: is "undue inducement" suspect?
Brody H
Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(5):15-6. PubMed ID: 16179298
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Free-riding and research ethics.
Allhoff F
Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(1):50-1; author reply W15-8. PubMed ID: 16036662
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Reflections on 'Rethinking research ethics'.
Levine RJ
Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(1):1-3; author reply W15-8. PubMed ID: 16036649
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Putting the "ethics" into "research ethics".
Spike J
Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(1):51-3; author reply W15-8. PubMed ID: 16036663
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. "You may have already won..": an examination of the use of lottery payments in research.
Brown JS; Schonfeld TL; Gordon BG
IRB; 2006; 28(1):12-6. PubMed ID: 16680874
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Does research ethics rest on a mistake? The common good, reasonable risk and social justice.
London AJ
Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(1):37-9; author reply W15-8. PubMed ID: 16036656
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Meaningful work as due inducement.
Weijer C
Theor Med Bioeth; 2005; 26(5):431-5. PubMed ID: 16245008
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Being directly responsive and accountable to human-research participants.
Fleming DA; Reynolds D
Am J Bioeth; 2008 Mar; 8(3):24-5; discussion W4-6. PubMed ID: 18570094
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Response to Athula Sumathipala and Sisira Siribaddana, "Revisiting 'freely given informed consent' in relation to the developing world: the role of an Ombudsman" (AJOB 4:3).
Simpson B
Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(1):W24-6. PubMed ID: 16036646
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
