305 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16179438)
1. Peer review. Suggesting or excluding reviewers can help get your paper published.
Grimm D
Science; 2005 Sep; 309(5743):1974. PubMed ID: 16179438
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Suggesting reviewers affects outcome?
Wray KB
Science; 2005 Nov; 310(5750):971-2. PubMed ID: 16299870
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Suggesting reviewers affects outcome?
Ackerley DF
Science; 2005 Nov; 310(5750):971-2. PubMed ID: 16284161
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Peer review as professional responsibility: a quality control system only as good as the participants.
Grainger DW
Biomaterials; 2007 Dec; 28(34):5199-203. PubMed ID: 17643484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Publishing in English-language journals.
Davis AJ; Tschudin V
Nurs Ethics; 2007 May; 14(3):425-30. PubMed ID: 17459824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Survey of conflict-of-interest disclosure policies of ophthalmology journals.
Anraku A; Jin YP; Trope GE; Buys YM
Ophthalmology; 2009 Jun; 116(6):1093-6. PubMed ID: 19376583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. You're a published author!
Tompkins O
AAOHN J; 2010 Aug; 58(8):315. PubMed ID: 20812397
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. [Tidsskriftet, peer review and medical publishing].
Bjørheim J; Frich JC; Gjersvik P; Jacobsen G; Swensen E
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2006 Jan; 126(1):20-3. PubMed ID: 16397649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The effect of masking manuscripts for the peer-review process of an ophthalmic journal.
Isenberg SJ; Sanchez E; Zafran KC
Br J Ophthalmol; 2009 Jul; 93(7):881-4. PubMed ID: 19211602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Ghostwriting].
Haug C
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2008 May; 128(9):1039. PubMed ID: 18451881
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Peer reviewers can meet journals' criteria for authorship.
Erren TC; Erren M; Shaw DM
BMJ; 2013 Jan; 346():f166. PubMed ID: 23325884
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Stem cells. ...and how the problems eluded peer reviewers and editors.
Couzin J
Science; 2006 Jan; 311(5757):23-4. PubMed ID: 16400115
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. [The journals must honestly tell who is doing the job].
Bergström R
Lakartidningen; 2008 May 7-13; 105(19):1406-7. PubMed ID: 18574981
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. How to get your paper published paper: an editor's perspective.
Fonseca VA
J Diabetes Complications; 2014; 28(1):1-3. PubMed ID: 24120283
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Early editorial manuscript screening versus obligate peer review: a randomized trial.
Johnston SC; Lowenstein DH; Ferriero DM; Messing RO; Oksenberg JR; Hauser SL
Ann Neurol; 2007 Apr; 61(4):A10-2. PubMed ID: 17444512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Double-blind review favours increased representation of female authors.
Budden AE; Tregenza T; Aarssen LW; Koricheva J; Leimu R; Lortie CJ
Trends Ecol Evol; 2008 Jan; 23(1):4-6. PubMed ID: 17963996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Authorship and co-authorship].
Haug C
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2006 Feb; 126(4):429. PubMed ID: 16477275
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Editorial peer review in biomedical publishing: an overview.
Napolitani Cheyne F
Rom J Gastroenterol; 2004 Jun; 13(2):155-7. PubMed ID: 15229782
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Geriatrics editorial policy on disclosures.
Sherman FT; Radak JT
Geriatrics; 2006 Sep; 61(9):6. PubMed ID: 16989541
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Successful publishing: how to get your paper accepted.
Audisio RA; Stahel RA; Aapro MS; Costa A; Pandey M; Pavlidis N
Surg Oncol; 2009 Dec; 18(4):350-6. PubMed ID: 18849161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
