These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

327 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16180289)

  • 1. An inside look at partial birth abortion.
    Lowe LR
    Thurgood Marshall Law Rev; 1998-1999; 24():327-57. PubMed ID: 16180289
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Banning partial-birth abortion: drafting a constitutionally acceptable statute.
    Gough AD
    Univ Dayton Law Rev; 1998; 24(1):187-214. PubMed ID: 12774818
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. U.S. Court in New York rejects partial-birth abortion ban.
    Preston J
    N Y Times Web; 2004 Aug; ():A12. PubMed ID: 15540363
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Fetal pain legislation: is it viable?
    Collett TS
    Pepperdine Law Rev; 2003 Jan; 30(2):161-84. PubMed ID: 15237508
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. When does a fetus become a child in need of an advocate? Focusing on fetal pain.
    McDonald TB
    Child Leg Rights J; 1997; 17(2):12-9. PubMed ID: 12159907
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The development of the undue burden standard in Stenberg v. Carhart: will proposed RU-486 legislation survive?
    Guenther H
    Indiana Law Rev; 2002; 35(3):1021-44. PubMed ID: 16211757
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Partial-birth abortion: should moral judgment prevail over medical judgment?
    Walther KE
    Loyola Univ Chic Law J; 2000; 31(4):693-736. PubMed ID: 11962531
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. It's my body, it's my choice: the Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act of 2003.
    Kushnir TF
    Loyola Univ Chic Law J; 2004; 35(4):1117-88. PubMed ID: 15732189
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Abortion and birth control--right to abortion and regulation thereof: the United States Supreme Court invalidates a statute banning partial birth abortions: Stenberg v. Carhart, 530 U.S. 914 (2000).
    Joersz M
    N D Law Rev; 2001; 77(2):345-73. PubMed ID: 12956123
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. State's partial-birth abortion ban supported.
    Chopko M; Moses M
    Origins; 2000 Mar; 29(38):617-23. PubMed ID: 11913443
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Abortion: history, opinions, and what's new in the United States.
    Jubb ED
    Can Bar J; 1973 Jul; 4(3):8-12. PubMed ID: 11663761
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Candor and the court: the Supreme Court will confront as never before the violent nature of mid- and later-term abortion.
    Stith R
    America (NY); 2000 Apr; 182(11):13-5. PubMed ID: 11913437
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. So-called "partial birth abortion" bans: bad medicine? Maybe. Bad law? Definitely!
    Massie AM
    Univ Pittsbg Law Rev; 1998; 59(2):301-80. PubMed ID: 11902179
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act of 2003.
    Gordon A
    Harvard J Legis; 2004; 41(2):501-15. PubMed ID: 16596750
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Banning partial-birth abortions: a few inches away from testing post-viability jurisprudence.
    Flanagan PP
    Seton Hall Legis J; 1998; 23(1):141-77. PubMed ID: 16514753
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Justices to review federal ban on disputed abortion method; case may hinge on Alito, Court's newest member.
    Greenhouse L
    N Y Times Web; 2006 Feb; ():A1, A14. PubMed ID: 16514736
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Abortion rights after South Dakota.
    McDonagh E
    Free Inq; 2006; 26(4):34-8. PubMed ID: 16830439
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act of 2003.
    Origins; 2003 Nov; 33(24):420-3. PubMed ID: 14982095
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Easing abortion's pain: the new fight to help the unborn.
    Kolenc AB
    America (NY); 2005 Sep; 193(8):18-21. PubMed ID: 16302322
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Stenberg v. Carhart: women retain their right to choose.
    Berkowitz JF
    J Crim Law Criminol; 2001; 91(2):337-83. PubMed ID: 12774791
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.