These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
210 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16180297)
1. Children not meant to be: protecting the interests of the child when abortion results in live birth. Casagrande KM Quinnipiac Health Law J; 2002; 6(1):19-55. PubMed ID: 16180297 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Baby doe redux? The Department of Health and Human Services and the Born-Alive Infants Protection Act of 2002: a cautionary note on normative neonatal practice. Sayeed SA Pediatrics; 2005 Oct; 116(4):e576-85. PubMed ID: 16199687 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. New attention for 2002 law on survivors of abortions. Pear R N Y Times Web; 2005 Apr; ():A10. PubMed ID: 15940860 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The Born-Alive Infants Protection Act: baby steps toward the recognition of life after birth. Scaldo SA Nova Law Rev; 2002; 26(2):485-510. PubMed ID: 16270465 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Gestational burdens and fetal status: justifying Roe v. Wade. Robertson JA Am J Law Med; 1987; 13(2-3):189-212. PubMed ID: 3333215 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Brief supports partial-birth abortion ban. Catholic Church. United States Conference of Catholic Bishops [USCCB] Origins; 2006 Jun; 36(4):58-63. PubMed ID: 16832962 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Banning partial-birth abortions: a few inches away from testing post-viability jurisprudence. Flanagan PP Seton Hall Legis J; 1998; 23(1):141-77. PubMed ID: 16514753 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. On the Born-Alive Infants Protection Act of 2000. Arkes H Hum Life Rev; 2000; 26(4):15-26. PubMed ID: 12530369 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. So-called "partial birth abortion" bans: bad medicine? Maybe. Bad law? Definitely! Massie AM Univ Pittsbg Law Rev; 1998; 59(2):301-80. PubMed ID: 11902179 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. "Partial birth" abortion and the health exception: protecting maternal health or risking abortion on demand? Glidewell G Fordham Urban Law J; 2001 Apr; 28(4):1089-150. PubMed ID: 12680381 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The future of abortion. Flynn T Free Inq; 1989; 9():44-6. PubMed ID: 16100826 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Jon O. Newman and the abortion decisions: a remarkable first year. Hurwitz AD NY Law Sch Law Rev; 2002-2003; 46(1-2):231-47. PubMed ID: 16493839 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The Court and abortion: worse than you think. Dworkin R New York Rev Books; 2007 May; 54(9):20-1. PubMed ID: 17517997 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Religion, politics, and abortion. Perry MJ Univ Detroit Mercy Law Rev; 2001; 79(1):1-37. PubMed ID: 16538743 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Are the 21-year-old Baby Doe rules misunderstood or mistaken? Kopelman LM Pediatrics; 2005 Mar; 115(3):797-802. PubMed ID: 15741390 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. An inside look at partial birth abortion. Lowe LR Thurgood Marshall Law Rev; 1998-1999; 24():327-57. PubMed ID: 16180289 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The hand as emblem of human identity: a solution to the abortion controversy based on science and reason. Hope D Univ Toledo Law Rev; 2001; 32(2):205-28. PubMed ID: 16485373 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. When does a fetus become a child in need of an advocate? Focusing on fetal pain. McDonald TB Child Leg Rights J; 1997; 17(2):12-9. PubMed ID: 12159907 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Abortion and birth control--right to abortion and regulation thereof: the United States Supreme Court invalidates a statute banning partial birth abortions: Stenberg v. Carhart, 530 U.S. 914 (2000). Joersz M N D Law Rev; 2001; 77(2):345-73. PubMed ID: 12956123 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]