180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16180314)
1. [Prognostic implications of positive margins in radical prostatectomy specimens].
Ojea Calvo A; González Piñeiro A; Domínguez Freire F; Alonso Rodrigo A; Rodríguez Iglesias B; Benavente Delgado J
Actas Urol Esp; 2005; 29(7):641-56. PubMed ID: 16180314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The significance of positive surgical margin in areas of capsular incision in otherwise organ confined disease at radical prostatectomy.
Chuang AY; Nielsen ME; Hernandez DJ; Walsh PC; Epstein JI
J Urol; 2007 Oct; 178(4 Pt 1):1306-10. PubMed ID: 17698141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Stage T1-2 prostate cancer: a multivariate analysis of factors affecting biochemical and clinical failures after radical prostatectomy.
Kupelian PA; Katcher J; Levin HS; Klein EA
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1997 Mar; 37(5):1043-52. PubMed ID: 9169811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Impact of positive surgical margins on prostate-specific antigen failure after radical prostatectomy in adjuvant treatment-naïve patients.
Ploussard G; Agamy MA; Alenda O; Allory Y; Mouracade P; Vordos D; Hoznek A; Abbou CC; de la Taille A; Salomon L
BJU Int; 2011 Jun; 107(11):1748-54. PubMed ID: 20883488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Influence of focal and diffuse extraprostatic extension and positive surgical margins on biochemical progression following radical prostatectomy.
Billis A; Meirelles LL; Freitas LL; Magna LA; Reis LO; Ferreira U
Int Braz J Urol; 2012; 38(2):175-84. PubMed ID: 22555042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Biochemical recurrence rates are similar for pT2-positive surgical margins and pT3a.
Leite KR; Hartmann C; Reis ST; Viana N; Dall'Oglio MF; Sant'Anna AC; Nesrallah A; Nesrallah L; Antunes AA; Camara-Lopes LH; Srougi M
Int Braz J Urol; 2014; 40(2):146-53. PubMed ID: 24856481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Correlation of clinical and pathologic factors with rising prostate-specific antigen profiles after radical prostatectomy alone for clinically localized prostate cancer.
Kupelian P; Katcher J; Levin H; Zippe C; Klein E
Urology; 1996 Aug; 48(2):249-60. PubMed ID: 8753737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The relationship between the extent of surgical margin positivity and prostate specific antigen recurrence in radical prostatectomy specimens.
Marks RA; Koch MO; Lopez-Beltran A; Montironi R; Juliar BE; Cheng L
Hum Pathol; 2007 Aug; 38(8):1207-11. PubMed ID: 17490720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Length of positive surgical margin after radical prostatectomy as a predictor of biochemical recurrence.
Shikanov S; Song J; Royce C; Al-Ahmadie H; Zorn K; Steinberg G; Zagaja G; Shalhav A; Eggener S
J Urol; 2009 Jul; 182(1):139-44. PubMed ID: 19450829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Risk factors of positive surgical margin and biochemical recurrence of patients treated with radical prostatectomy: a single-center 10-year report.
Li K; Li H; Yang Y; Ian LH; Pun WH; Ho SF
Chin Med J (Engl); 2011 Apr; 124(7):1001-5. PubMed ID: 21542957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Correlation of margin status and extraprostatic extension with progression of prostate carcinoma.
Cheng L; Darson MF; Bergstralh EJ; Slezak J; Myers RP; Bostwick DG
Cancer; 1999 Nov; 86(9):1775-82. PubMed ID: 10547551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Prognostic significance of positive surgical margins in patients with extraprostatic carcinoma after radical prostatectomy.
Kausik SJ; Blute ML; Sebo TJ; Leibovich BC; Bergstralh EJ; Slezak J; Zincke H
Cancer; 2002 Sep; 95(6):1215-9. PubMed ID: 12216087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Positive surgical margins with radical retropubic prostatectomy: anatomic site-specific pathologic analysis and impact on prognosis.
Obek C; Sadek S; Lai S; Civantos F; Rubinowicz D; Soloway MS
Urology; 1999 Oct; 54(4):682-8. PubMed ID: 10510928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Recurrence following radical surgery for prostatic cancer. Analysis of clinical, biological and anatomo-pathological prognostic factors].
Feyaerts A; Delrée A; Lorge F; Opsomer RJ; Wese FX; Van Cangh PJ; Draguet AP; Cosyns JP
Acta Urol Belg; 1997 Mar; 65(1):11-8. PubMed ID: 9245198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Does capsular incision at radical retropubic prostatectomy affect disease-free survival in otherwise organ-confined prostate cancer?
Barocas DA; Han M; Epstein JI; Chan DY; Trock BJ; Walsh PC; Partin AW
Urology; 2001 Nov; 58(5):746-51. PubMed ID: 11711353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Prostate specific antigen recurrence rates are low after radical retropubic prostatectomy and positive margins.
Simon MA; Kim S; Soloway MS
J Urol; 2006 Jan; 175(1):140-4; discussion 144-5. PubMed ID: 16406892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Implications of greater short-term PSA recurrence with laparoscopic as compared to retropubic radical prostatectomy for Japanese clinically localized prostate carcinomas.
Akita H; Okamura T; Ando R; Nagata D; Naruyama H; Yamada Y; Naiki T; Yasui T; Tozawa K; Kohri K
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2011; 12(11):2959-61. PubMed ID: 22393971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Presence or absence of a positive pathological margin outperforms any other margin-associated variable in predicting clinically relevant biochemical recurrence in Gleason 7 prostate cancer.
Huang JG; Pedersen J; Hong MK; Harewood LM; Peters J; Costello AJ; Hovens CM; Corcoran NM
BJU Int; 2013 May; 111(6):921-7. PubMed ID: 23350712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: oncological evaluation after 1,000 cases a Montsouris Institute.
Guillonneau B; el-Fettouh H; Baumert H; Cathelineau X; Doublet JD; Fromont G; Vallancien G
J Urol; 2003 Apr; 169(4):1261-6. PubMed ID: 12629339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A comparison of the incidence and location of positive surgical margins in robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and open retropubic radical prostatectomy.
Smith JA; Chan RC; Chang SS; Herrell SD; Clark PE; Baumgartner R; Cookson MS
J Urol; 2007 Dec; 178(6):2385-9; discussion 2389-90. PubMed ID: 17936849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
