These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

344 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16180477)

  • 1. Assessing the environmental burdens of anaerobic digestion in comparison to alternative options for managing the biodegradable fraction of municipal solid wastes.
    Haight M
    Water Sci Technol; 2005; 52(1-2):553-9. PubMed ID: 16180477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Assessment of the environmental impact of management measures for the biodegradable fraction of municipal solid waste in São Paulo City.
    Mendes MR; Aramaki T; Hanaki K
    Waste Manag; 2003; 23(5):403-9. PubMed ID: 12893012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Emission of greenhouse gases from anaerobic digestion processes: comparison with other municipal solid waste treatments.
    Baldasano JM; Soriano C
    Water Sci Technol; 2000; 41(3):275-82. PubMed ID: 11382002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Environmental aspects of the anaerobic digestion of the organic fraction of municipal solid wastes and of solid agricultural wastes.
    Edelmann W; Baier U; Engeli H
    Water Sci Technol; 2005; 52(1-2):203-8. PubMed ID: 16180429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Anaerobic digestion as a sustainable solution for biosolids management by the Montreal metropolitan community.
    Frigon JC; Guiot SR
    Water Sci Technol; 2005; 52(1-2):561-6. PubMed ID: 16180478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of selected aerobic and anaerobic procedures for MSW treatment.
    Fricke K; Santen H; Wallmann R
    Waste Manag; 2005; 25(8):799-810. PubMed ID: 16125060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The impact of landfilling and composting on greenhouse gas emissions--a review.
    Lou XF; Nair J
    Bioresour Technol; 2009 Aug; 100(16):3792-8. PubMed ID: 19155172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Life cycle assessment of bagasse waste management options.
    Kiatkittipong W; Wongsuchoto P; Pavasant P
    Waste Manag; 2009 May; 29(5):1628-33. PubMed ID: 19136243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A multi-criteria ranking of different technologies for the anaerobic digestion for energy recovery of the organic fraction of municipal solid wastes.
    Karagiannidis A; Perkoulidis G
    Bioresour Technol; 2009 Apr; 100(8):2355-60. PubMed ID: 19119004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Energy recovery from municipal solid waste in an anaerobic reactor.
    Jeyapriya SP; Saseetharan MK
    J Environ Sci Eng; 2008 Jul; 50(3):235-8. PubMed ID: 19552079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of static, in-vessel composting of MSW with thermophilic anaerobic digestion and combinations of the two processes.
    Walker L; Charles W; Cord-Ruwisch R
    Bioresour Technol; 2009 Aug; 100(16):3799-807. PubMed ID: 19345576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. LCA: a decision support tool for environmental assessment of MSW management systems.
    Liamsanguan C; Gheewala SH
    J Environ Manage; 2008 Apr; 87(1):132-8. PubMed ID: 17350748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A technical, economic and environmental comparison of composting and anaerobic digestion of biodegradable municipal waste.
    Murphy JD; Power NM
    J Environ Sci Health A Tox Hazard Subst Environ Eng; 2006; 41(5):865-79. PubMed ID: 16702064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cogeneration from thermal treatment of selected municipal solid wastes. A stoichiometric model building for the case study on Palermo.
    Lo Mastro F; Mistretta M
    Waste Manag; 2004; 24(3):309-17. PubMed ID: 15016419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The potential of bio-methane as bio-fuel/bio-energy for reducing greenhouse gas emissions: a qualitative assessment for Europe in a life cycle perspective.
    Tilche A; Galatola M
    Water Sci Technol; 2008; 57(11):1683-92. PubMed ID: 18547917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Ecological, energetic and economic comparison of anaerobic digestion with different competing technologies to treat biogenic wastes.
    Edelmann W; Schleiss K; Joss A
    Water Sci Technol; 2000; 41(3):263-73. PubMed ID: 11382001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Kinetics and dynamic modelling of batch anaerobic digestion of municipal solid waste in a stirred reactor.
    Nopharatana A; Pullammanappallil PC; Clarke WP
    Waste Manag; 2007; 27(5):595-603. PubMed ID: 16797956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Co-digestion of energy crops and the source-sorted organic fraction of municipal solid waste.
    Nordberg A; Edström M
    Water Sci Technol; 2005; 52(1-2):217-22. PubMed ID: 16180431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Environmental impact of rejected materials generated in organic fraction of municipal solid waste anaerobic digestion plants: Comparison of wet and dry process layout.
    Colazo AB; Sánchez A; Font X; Colón J
    Waste Manag; 2015 Sep; 43():84-97. PubMed ID: 26123979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The anaerobic digestion of solid organic waste.
    Khalid A; Arshad M; Anjum M; Mahmood T; Dawson L
    Waste Manag; 2011 Aug; 31(8):1737-44. PubMed ID: 21530224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.